Logo
homeHome
toggle_offCompany ProfilegroupsBoards & Staffsworkspace_premiumMemberships & PartnersschoolAcademy of Journalismperson_addCareerslinkBlog(EN)emailContact Us
list_altOur JournalslightbulbInstruction for AuthorsbookmarkBrieflands PolicieshandshakePublish My Researchplay_circleJournal Management Systemcredit_cardArticle Processing Chargeszoom_inOpen Peer ReviewimagePublishing Services
menu_bookPublish My Book

Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

The Official Journal of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences

homeHome
play_circleCurrent IssuelistAll Issuesformat_indent_increaseIn Press Articlescheck_circleAccepted ManuscriptssearchSearch
settingsInstructions
bookmarkJournal InformationgroupsBoards and CommitteespublicIndexing and Listing Sourcesshow_chartJournal Metricszoom_inOpen Peer Review (OPR)balancePublication Ethics and Malpractice Statementassignment_indReviewer and AE Registration FormemailSupportphoneContact Us
credit_cardAPC
Authors GuideSubmit Manuscript

Outlines

https://doi.org/10.17795/zjrms-2096

Comparison of Antifungal Activity of Extracts of Ten Plant Species and Griseofulvin Against Human Pathogenic Dermatophytes

Author(s):
Alireza MassihaAlireza Massiha1,*, Panah Zolfaghar MuradovPanah Zolfaghar Muradov2
1Department of Biotechnology, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan Branch, Lahijan, IR Iran
2Department of Microbiology, Institute of Microbiology, Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan
Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences:Vol. 17, issue 10; e2096
Published online:Oct 25, 2015
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jun 09, 2014
Accepted:Oct 01, 2014
How to Cite:Massiha A, Muradov PZ. Comparison of Antifungal Activity of Extracts of Ten Plant Species and Griseofulvin Against Human Pathogenic Dermatophytes. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2015;17(10):e2096. doi: https://doi.org/10.17795/zjrms-2096

Abstract

Background:

This study was conducted to measure the antifungal activity of the extracts of 10 plant species used in traditional Iranian medicine against human pathogenic dermatophytes.

Materials and Methods:

In this experimental study, the leaves of these plants (Calendula officinalis, Acacia arabica, Altheae officinalis, Ginkgo biloba, Juglans regia, Osimum basilicum, Solanum nigrum, Hypericum perforatum, Urtica dioica, and Anagalis arvensis) were taken and extractions were made in methanol and were tested against Microsporum canis, Microsporum gypseum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton schoenleinii, and Epidermophyton floccosum. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined using broth macrodilution method. The effects of plants extracts were compared with those of griseofulvin.

Results:

Plants under review showed antifungal activity against all the dermatophytes tested with MIC values ranging from 0.001 to 0.016 mg/mL using inhibitory zone estimation, 0.3 to 12.8 mg/mL using agar dilution method and 0.2 to 12.5 mg/mL using broth dilution method. The minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of the extracts ranged from 0.8 to 15.62 mg/mL.

Conclusions:

The results obtained suggested that H. perforatum, A. arvensis, and A. arabica have anti-dermatophyte activity.

Keywords
Antifungal Activity
Biochemical Components
Methanol Extract
Dermatophytes
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration

1. Background

Medicinal plants have been used for centuries as remedies for human diseases. They constitute an effective source of both traditional and modern medicine. The acceptance of traditional medicine as an alternative form of health care hassled researchers to further investigate antimicrobial activity of medicinal plants. Some countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin America use traditional medicine to help meet some of their primary health care needs [1]. The use of plant compounds to treat infections is an age-old practice in large parts of the world, especially in developing countries, where there is dependence on traditional medicine for a variety of diseases [2, 3]. Interest in plants with antimicrobial properties has revived as a result of current problems associated with the use of antibiotics [4, 5]. Dermatophytes are the fungal pathogens of humans and animals infecting the keratinized tissues e.g. skin, nails, and hairs, since they are most likely found in hot humid areas [6]. These fungi can easily digest the keratinized tissue by releasing sulphite, exoprotease, and endoprotease [7]. Sulphite being a reducing agent broke the disulphide bonds of keratin protein and made them more vulnerable to fungal proteases enzymes. The diseases caused by dermatophytes are also known as dermatoses and their prevalence depend upon the activity of peoples [8]. Human infections, particularly those involving the skin and mucosal surface constitute a serious problem, especially in tropical and subtropical developing countries; dermatophytes and Candida spp. being the most frequent pathogen. Herbal medicines have been important sources of products for the developing countries in treating common infections including fungal diseases. Some studies have demonstrated that the plant extract has been used traditionally to treat a number of infectious diseases caused by bacteria and fungi [9-13].
Many researchers, particularly the ones from countries with a rich biodiversity, have contributed to the detection of new antifungal compounds in medicinal plants. Screening used in vitro evaluation is a useful tool for the discovery of new potential antifungal agents from natural products such as essential oils and extracts derived from plants.

2. Objectives

The aim of this work was an evaluation in vitro the potential antifungal activity of native plants against human pathogenic dermatophytes in order to verify possible inhibition activity. Moreover, the smallest concentration capable of inhibiting or preventing growth was determined among the species and extracts that demonstrated inhibitory properties. In order to determine these activities, a comprehensive screening study was carried out for 10 plant species collected from north of Iran (Guilan).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Collection and Identification

In this experimental study, the leaves of the different plants involve Calendula officinalis, Acacia arabica, Altheae officinalis, Ginkgo biloba, Juglans regia, Osimum basilicum, Solanum nigrum, Hypericum perforatum, Urtica dioica, and Anagalis arvensis, were collected from north of Iran. These plants were identified by the plant taxonomy laboratory, Department of Botany, Islamic Azad University of Iran, Lahijan Branch. Fresh plant material were washed under running tap water, air dried, and then homogenized to fine powder and stored in airtight bottles.
This study comprised of samples received from all the patients suspected of fungal infections over a period of one year (March 2009 to August 2009) in the Microbiology Laboratory which is attached to Razi’s general hospital in northern Iran (Guilan Province).

3.2. Preparation of Extracts

An extraction was carried out by Soxhlet procedure as described by Horowitz (1984). Thirty grams of the dried plant leaf was extracted with 300 mL of methanol (BDH). The process was repeated using 500 mL hexane (BDH) as solvent. The extracts were recovered from the solvent using rotavapour apparatus and stored in a freezer (-20°C) for subsequent antifungal activities. Fresh leaf (20 g) was blended with 10 mL of water in a Moulinex blender for 5 minutes and the suspension filtered through muslin cloth. A clear filtrate obtained by further filtration of the suspension through grade No. 1 filter paper, Whatman (manufactured by Whatman, U.K.) and sterilized at 121°C for 15 minutes was used to impregnate discs (6 mm) [14]. In this study, the phytochemical combinations, including alkaloids, carbohydrates/glycosides, flavonoids, oils, phenolic compounds, proteins/aminoacids, proteins/aminoacids, saponin, steroids, tannin, terpenoids, and reducing suger are analyzed.

3.3. Fungi Isolates

The test species and isolates used for this investigation were: Microsporum canis,Microsporum gypseum,Trichophytonmentagrophytes,Trichophyton rubrum,Trichophyton schoenleinii, and Epidermophytonfloccosum. Identification of isolates obtained was performed according to standard methods [15].

3.4. Antifungal Assay of Methanolic Extracts

A qualitative antifungal screening was carried out using the agar well diffusion assay. Twenty milliliter of sterilized Sabouraud dextrose agar medium was poured into a 15 cm Petri dish. Twenty microliter of inoculums suspension of each test organism was distributed evenly over the surface. A 6 mm well was cut in the center of each plate using the wide-end of a sterilized Pasteur pipette. Fifty microliter of serial dilution of metabolic leaf extracts of selected native plants or griseofulvin were placed into the wells. The plates were incubated for 5 days at 30°C. Results of the qualitative screening were recorded as the average diameter of the inhibition zone surrounding the wells containing the test solution. Results were compared with griseofulvin. The percentage of mycelia inhibition was calculated as follows:
dc: colony diameter in control, dt: colony diameter in treatment.
Three replicate plates were used for each treatment. The MIC was regarded as the lowest concentration that produced a visible zone of inhibition [16].

3.5. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

MIC of extract was determined by broth dilution method. For this purpose, 1 mL of sterile liquid Sabouraud medium was added to 11 sterile capped tubes. Each 1 mL methanolic leaf extracts suspension (12.8 mg/mL in medium) was added to tube 1. The contents were mixed and 1 mL was transferred to tube 2. This serial dilution was repeated through to tube 9. One milliliter was discarded from tube 9. Fifty microliter of inoculum was added to tubes 1 - 10 and the contents were mixed. Medium control (no inoculum and no drug) and inoculum control (no drug) tubes were prepared. The final concentrations of selected native plants extract ranged from 6.4 to 0.025 mg/mL. For griseofulvin, the final concentration ranged from 0.064 - 0.00025 mg/mL. The tubes were incubated at 30°C for 72 hours. The fungal growth in each tube was detected turbid metrically at 530 nm. MIC was defined as the drug concentration at which the turbidity of the medium was the same as the medium control. Ten microliter aliquot of cell suspension from the tube without observed growth of fungi was inoculated on to Sabouraud dextrose agar and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of test compound was determined as the lowest concentration of the agent at which no colonies were seen after 4 days at 30°C [17].

3.6. Statistical Analyses

The comparison of average zone diameters and the evaluation of extract antimicrobial effects were analyzed by SPSS 11.5 and t-test. In this experiment, P value was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

4. Results

The obtained results of phytochemical combination of methanol extract showed that glycosides and phenolic compounds compared to oil, amino acids, steroids, flavonoids, reduce sugar, and were in more proportions (P = 0.045) (Table 1). In this research, the percentage of inhibition (Table 2) was calculated after comparing with griseofulvin (100% inhibition). The maximum activity was obtained from Calendula officinalis which was ranged from 66.6%, followed by Juglans regia the greatest inhibitory effect of griseofulvin was recorded with Trichophyton schoenleinii (37 mm; inhibition zone). Microsporum canis showed the most susceptibility against J. regia, A. arvensis, and Hypericum perforatum methanolic extracts (65 mm, 60 mm, and 55 mm; inhibition zone). The effects of the crude extract of different plants and standard drug at various concentrations are shown in Table 3. Zone of inhibition assay was performed using inhibitory zone estimating. The MIC values represent the average of 3 independent experiments. In this study, the inhibitory effects of methanolic leaf extracts of native plant were studied against 6 species of pathogenic dermatophytes including M. canis, M. gypseum, T. rubrum, T. schoenleinii, T. mentagrophytes, and E. floccosum.
Table 1.Phytochemical Screening Resultsa
Phytochemical TestsPlants
Anagalis arvensisJuglans regiaGinkgo bilobaUrtica dioicaAcacia arabicaCalendula officinalisOsimum basilicumSolanum nigrumHypericum perforatumAlthea officinalis
Alkaloids++++++++++--
Carbohydrates/glycosides+++++++-++++
Flavonoids-++++-++-+-
Oils-+--+-+-+++
Phenolic compounds+++++++-+++
Proteins/aminoacids-+--+++-+++
Saponin++++-+++++--
Steroids--+++++-+-+
Tannin-+++++-+++++
Terpenoids+++ND-++-++
Reducing suger+++++ND+---+

a-, Absent; +, Present; ++, Abundant; ND, not defined.

Table 2.The Percent of Inhibition of the Crude Extract of Different Plants Compared to Griseofulvin (100% Inhibition) Against Different Dermatophytes
PlantsFungi Species
M. canisM. gypseumT. rubrumT. schoenleiniiT. mentagrophytesE. floccosum
S. nigrum292737353328
H. perforatum554853404343
A. officinalis1022222
O. basilicum30354533.337.542.4
A. arvensis604246554525
U. dioica121082710
G. biloba2533.335-2526.3
C. officinalis37.537.566.65026.365
A. arabica50556037.542.455
J. regia655550605033.3
Griseofulvin100100100100100100
Table 3.Griseofulvin Inhibitory Effects on Selected Fungal Species
DermatophytesExtract Inhibitory Concentrations, mg/mL
6.43.21.60.80.40.20.10.050.025
M. canis1494------
M. gypseum16116------
T. rubrum17125------
T. schoenleinii16115------
T. mentagrophytes201362-----
E. floccosum19125------
Inhibitory zone estimating, agar dilution method and broth dilution method were used in this study and the results were compared with each other and griseofulvin. The following tables show the effectiveness of antifungal activity of native plants in northern Iran. The results obtained suggest that H. perforatum, A. arvensisand, and A. arabica have anti-dermatophyte activity (Tables 3 - 6).
Table 4.Inhibitory Effects of Native Plants Extracts on Fungal Species Isolated
Test FungiInhibitory Concentrations of C. officinalis Extract, mg/mLInhibitory Concentrations of A. arabica Extract mg/mLInhibitory Concentrations of J. regia Extract, mg/mL
6.43.21.60.80.40.20.10.050.0256.43.21.60.80.40.20.10.050.0256.43.21.60.80.40.20.10.050.025
M. canis211810148----251611144----2923211815118--
M. gypseum2320-------23214------2525201711----
T. rubrum35211273----201787-----2322191510----
T. schoenleinii1515104-----141174-----24211713108---
T. mentagrophytes242014104----211812104----26221915137---
E. floccosum322310105----221910104----232116107----
Table 5.Inhibitory Effects of Native Plants Extracts on Fungal Species Isolated
Test FungiInhibitory Concentrations of G. biloba Extract, mg/mLInhibitory Concentrations of U. dioica Extract, mg/mLInhibitory Concentrations of A. arvensis Extract, mg/mL
6.43.21.60.80.40.20.10.050.0256.43.21.60.80.40.20.10.050.0256.43.21.60.80.40.20.10.050.025
M. canis12107------6--------2712.575-----
M. gypseum106-------3--------1612-------
T. rubrum83-------2--------18134------
T. schoenleinii---------2--------842------
T. mentagrophytes73-------3--------151173-----
E. floccosum52-------2--------12104.52-----
Table 6.Inhibitory Effects of Native Plants Extracts on Fungal Species Isolated
Test Fungi Inhibitory Concentrations of Osimum basilicum Extract, mg/mLInhibitory Concentrations of Althea officinalis Extract, mg/mLInhibitory Concentrations of Hypericum perforatum Extract, mg/mL
6.43.21.60.80.40.20.10.050.0256.43.21.60.80.40.20.10.050.0256.43.21.60.80.40.20.10.050.025
M. canis1914862----7--------25157------
M. gypseum181732--------------19133------
T. rubrum211564--------------18106------
T. schoenleinii10852--------------942------
T. mentagrophytes18161063-------------2713752----
E. floccosum1715752-------------241164-----
Table 7.MIC Results of Species Plant Extracts Against Test Fungi by Broth Dilution Method
DermatophytesPlant Extract MIC, mg/mL
Juglans regiaAcacia arabicaCalendula officinalisGinkgo bilobaUrtica dioicaAnagalis arvensisOsimum basilicumAlthea officinalisHypericum perforatumSolanum nigrumGriseofulvin
E. floccosum0.60.390.27.81ND0.41.4ND0.160.002
T. mentagrophytes40.130.27.20ND3.74.4ND0.68.500.002
T. schoenleinii0.860.170.47.20ND0.41.2ND0.180.001
T. rubrum1.10.321.47.81ND0.61.8ND0.68.50.004
M. gypseum1.30.771.47.81ND0.82.1ND0.612.50.016
M. canis2.10.420.77.2ND1.92.3ND0.360.004
Table 8.Fungicidal Effects of Species Plant Methanol Extracts Determined
DermatophytesPlant Extract MFC, mg/mL
Juglans regiaAcacia arabicaCalendula officinalisGinkgo bilobaUrtica dioicaAnagalis arvensisOsimum basilicumAlthea officinalisHypericum perforatumSolanum nigrumGriseofulvin
E. floccosum4.41.60.815.25ND4.404.6ND312.50.01
T. mentagrophytes3.773.20.815.62ND7.815.9ND2.3280.195
T. schoenleinii2.321.60.815.25ND4.23.7ND1.1400.024
T. rubrum3.63.21.615.20ND3.73.9ND1.9280.048
M. gypseum4.26.43.215.62ND3.76.8ND1.5450.039
M. canis3.36.46.415.25ND4.456.9ND1.812.50.009
Table 7 showed MIC of species plant extracts against test fungi. Table 8 showed MFC of species plant extracts against test fungi. It was ranged from 0.001 - 0.016 mg/mL for griseofulvin. The MICs for the different plant extracts were ranged from 0.2 to 12.5 mg/mL. The antifungal activities of griseofulvin were determined by using broth microdilution technique, against dermatophytes and the MICs for T. schoenleinii, E. floccosum, and T. mentagrophytes were ranged from 0.01 - 0.32 mg/mL. It can be concluded that, MICs calculated were greater than that obtained for griseofulvin.

5. Discussion

The results of this paper have proved that methanol extract of H. perforatum, A. arvensis, and A. arabica used in traditional medicine for fungal infections was beneficial. The growth of the strains tested with variable degrees of sensitivity. The extracts of have developed a fungicidal activity with a minimal inhibitory concentration of 0.13 mg/mL and 0.17 mg/mL, respectively against T. mentagrophytes and T. schoenleinii. The positive results of current study encourage us to the natural molecules responsible for this antifungal activity. The phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of important secondary metabolite (alkaloids, phenolic compounds, saponins, tannins, steroid, flavonoids, and carbohydrates), thus, indicating the therapeutic potentials of extracts. It showed the presence of bioactive compounds as well as the antifungal properties of methanolic extract. The effective use of plant extracts with the lowest MIC and MFC griseofulvin compared with other herbs and extracts from the leaves of plants H. perforatum, A. arabica, and C. officinalis. Among the species tested, the most resistant strain of yeast extract used, M. gypseum most sensitive strains, T. schoenleinii and was E. floccosum. The difference in resistance and susceptibility of strains of extracts used in determining the effective amount of the extract on fungi is important.
The results of the study conducted on 22 extracts of medicinal plants in Palestine showed that antifungal activities against on T. mentagrophytes, M. canis, and Trichophyton violaceum this is consistent with the results of this study [18].
Another study revealed that Rata chalapensis, J. regia, C. spinusa, and A. arvensis were the most helpful among testing plants (90 - 100% prohibitive) for dermatophytes [19]. Shoji et al. showed that aqueous and methanol extract of A. arvensis contained saponins and flavonoids [20]. The more saponins and carbohydrates are present the higher rate. As the geographical conditions of the amount or type of metabolites are effective on the extraction plants, different regions may have different results. The quantity and quality of the oil and the amount of menthol in different climates can be different in different samples [21]. Thus, it is suggested that plants are maintained under consideration of different sites with different climatic conditions and the effects of climatic conditions amount collected inhibitor compounds examined.
MIC extracts are used in the two types of fungi E. floccosum and T. schoenleinii that inhibited the growth of the fungus by killing them and also a better and faster treatment of infections can be registered because fungicide yeast is helpful. Demonstrating the effectiveness of herbal extracts H. perforatum, A. arabica, and C. officinalis listed on fungi, there are hopes that in future the plant assay with purified further investigation, combined with the low side of acceptable and antifungal effects of fungal infection achieved. Effective use of plant extracts with the lowest MIC and MFC griseofulvin compared with other herbs and extracts from the leaves of plants H. perforatum, A. arabica and was C. officinalis. Among the species tested, the most resistant strain of yeast extract used, Araujo et al. using broth microdilution technique, against dermatophytes and MICs for T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, and M. canis were ranged from 0.03 - 1 μg/mL [22].
M. gypseum most sensitive strains than T. schoenleinii and E. floccosum. The difference in resistance and susceptibility of strains of extracts used in determining the effective amount of the extract on fungi is important. MIC extracts used correspond to the two types of fungi E. floccosum and T. schoenleinii that these extracts inhibited the growth of the fungus by killing them and also better and faster treatment of infections due to fungicide yeast is helpful. It is important to investigate plants scientifically so that they can have been used in traditional medicines in order to determine potential sources of novel antimicrobial compounds [23, 24]. Plants have a long history of antibiotic usage for the cure of disease caused by antimicrobial, including antiviral, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. Antifungal activities of some plants have been reported by various researchers throughout the world like Sharma [25], Giron et al. [26], Mehrabian et al. [27], Farombi [28], Mahesh and Satish [29], Tewarri and Nayak [30], Rajendheran et al. [31], Nair et al. [32], and Prusti et al. [33]. Unfortunately, humans are not the ideal anti-fungal agents.
In addition, the incidence of adverse events and toxicity of fungal resistance phenomenon, most existing antifungal drugs need to be used in the field of power plants to natural antifungal drugs of plant origin may be found to overcome fungal disease. Further studies are needed to determine the antifungal compounds in such plant extract (isolation, separation and identification) as well as its formulation to be applicable as alternative methods to be used in treatment of skin and skin structures diseases in human and animal. Therefore, such results of a significant value that confirms the therapeutic potency of some plants used in traditional medicine. The ultimate conclusion of this study supports the traditional medicine use of different plant extracts in treating different infections caused by pathogenic fungi in Iran either by using a single or combined extracts.

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Sule WF, Okonko IO, Joseph TA, Ojezele MO, Nwanze JC, Alli JA, et al. In vitro antifungal activity of Senna alata Linn. crude leaf extract. Res J Biol Sci. 2010;5(3):275-84. https://doi.org/10.3923/rjbsci.2010.275.284.
  • 2.
    Gangoue-Pieboji J, Pegnyemb DE, Niyitegeka D, Nsangou A, Eze N, Minyem C, et al. The in-vitro antimicrobial activities of some medicinal plants from Cameroon. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2006;100(3):237-43. [PubMed ID: 16630381]. https://doi.org/10.1179/136485906X86365.
  • 3.
    Shibata H, Kondo K, Katsuyama R, Kawazoe K, Sato Y, Murakami K, et al. Alkyl gallates, intensifiers of beta-lactam susceptibility in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(2):549-55. [PubMed ID: 15673731]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.49.2.549-555.2005.
  • 4.
    Shiota S, Shimizu M, Sugiyama J, Morita Y, Mizushima T, Tsuchiya T. Mechanisms of action of corilagin and tellimagrandin I that remarkably potentiate the activity of beta-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol Immunol. 2004;48(1):67-73. [PubMed ID: 14734860].
  • 5.
    Abu-Shanab B, Adwan G, Abu-Safiya D, Jarrar N, Adwan K. Antibacterial activities of some plant extracts utilized in popular medicine in Palestine. Turk J Biol. 2004;28(99):102.
  • 6.
    Nweze EI. Dermatophytosis in Western Africa: a review. Pak J Biol Sci. 2010;13(13):649-56. [PubMed ID: 21717868].
  • 7.
    Monod M. Secreted proteases from dermatophytes. Mycopathologia. 2008;166(5-6):285-94. [PubMed ID: 18478360]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-008-9105-4.
  • 8.
    Ansart S, Perez L, Jaureguiberry S, Danis M, Bricaire F, Caumes E. Spectrum of dermatoses in 165 travelers returning from the tropics with skin diseases. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76(1):184-6. [PubMed ID: 17255251].
  • 9.
    Hmamouchi M, Tantaoui-Elaraki A, Es-Safi N, Agoumi A. Elucidation of the antibacterial and antifungal properties of the essential oils of Eucalyptus. Plantes Med Phytother. 1990;241:278-89.
  • 10.
    Pattnaik S, Subramanyam VR, Kole C. Antibacterial and antifungal activity of ten essential oils in vitro. Microbios. 1996;86(349):237-46. [PubMed ID: 8893526].
  • 11.
    Nejad BS, Deokule SS. Anti-dermatophytic activity of Drynaria quercifolia (L.) J. Smith. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2009;2(1):25-30.
  • 12.
    Yoshida M, Fuchigami M, Nagao T, Okabe H, Matsunaga K, Takata J, et al. Antiproliferative constituents from Umbelliferae plants VII. Active triterpenes and rosmarinic acid from Centella asiatica. Biol Pharm Bull. 2005;28(1):173-5. [PubMed ID: 15635187].
  • 13.
    Soylu EM, Tok FM, Soylu S, Kaya AD, Evrendilek GA. Antifungal activities of essential oils on post harvest disease agent Penicillium digitatum. Pak J Biol Sci. 2005;8:25-9.
  • 14.
    Iqbal MCM, Meiyalaghan S, Wijesekara KB, Abeyratne KB. Antifungal activity from water extracts of some common weeds. Pak J Biol Sci. 2001;4(7):843-5.
  • 15.
    Rebell G, Taplin D, Blank H. Dermatophytes: Their recognition and identification. USA: University of Miami Press; 1964.
  • 16.
    Shahi SK, Shukla AC, Bajaj AK. Broad spectrum antimitotic drug for the control of fungal infection in human beings. 1998. Available from: http://www.iisc.ernet.in/currsci/mar25/articles29.htm.
  • 17.
    Clark AM, El-Feraly FS, Li WS. Antimicrobial activity of phenolic constituents of Magnolia grandiflora L. J Pharm Sci. 1981;70(8):951-2. [PubMed ID: 7310672].
  • 18.
    Ali-Shtayeh MS, Abu Ghdeib SI. Antifungal activity of plant extracts against dermatophytes. Mycoses. 1999;42(11-12):665-72. [PubMed ID: 10680445].
  • 19.
    Rothwell JT, Marshall DJ. Suspected poisoning of sheep by Anagallis arvensis (scarlet pimpernel). Aust Vet J. 1986;63(9):316. [PubMed ID: 3800809].
  • 20.
    Shoji N, Umeyama A, Yoshikawa K, Arihara S. Triterpenoid glycosides from Anagallis arvensis. Phytochemistry. 1994;37(5):1397-402. [PubMed ID: 7765757].
  • 21.
    Yazdani D, Jamshidi AH, Mojab F. Comparison on menthol content of cultivated Peppermint at different regions of Iran. J Med Plants. 2002;1(3):73-7.
  • 22.
    Araujo CR, Miranda KC, Fernandes Ode F, Soares AJ, Silva Mdo R. In vitro susceptibility testing of dermatophytes isolated in Goiania, Brazil, against five antifungal agents by broth microdilution method. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2009;51(1):9-12. [PubMed ID: 19229384].
  • 23.
    Lack HW. Chronological sequence of publications by K. H. Rechinger since 1971. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Sciences. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Section B. Biolog Sci. 1986. p. 3-5.
  • 24.
    Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts. J Appl Microbiol. 1999;86(6):985-90. [PubMed ID: 10438227].
  • 25.
    Sharma A. Secondary metabolites from tissue cultures of some medicinally important plants. Thesis, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur; 1988.
  • 26.
    Giron LM, Freire V, Alonzo A, Caceres A. Ethnobotanical survey of the medicinal flora used by the Caribs of Guatemala. J Ethnopharmacol. 1991;34(2-3):173-87. [PubMed ID: 1795521].
  • 27.
    Mehrabian S, Molabashi Z. The antimicrobial effect of garlic (Allium sativum) extract on mouth microflora. Iran J Public Health. 1995;24(3-4):39-44.
  • 28.
    Farombi EO. African indigenous plants with chemotherapeutic potentials and biotechnological approach to the production of bioactive prophylactic agents. Afr J Biotechnol. 2004;2(12):662-71.
  • 29.
    Mahesh B, Satish S. Antimicrobial activity of some important medicinal plant against plant and human pathogens. World J AGR SCI. 2008;4(5):839-43.
  • 30.
    Tewari SN, Nayak M. Activity of four plant leaf extracts agaisnt three fungal pathogens of rice. Trop Agr. 1991;68(4):373-5.
  • 31.
    Rajendhran J, Arun Mani M, Navaneethakannan K. Antibacterial activity of some selected medicinal plants. Geobios. 1998;25(4):280-2.
  • 32.
    Nair R, Kalariya T, Chanda S. Antibacterial activity of some selected Indian medicinal flora. Turk J Biol. 2005;29(2005):41-7.
  • 33.
    Prusti A, Mishra SR, Sahoo S, Mishra SK. Antibacterial activity of some Indian medicinal plants. Ethnobot Leaflets. 2008;12:227-30.
Import into EndNoteImport into BibTex
Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Comments
Number of Comments:0
Cited by
Metrics
Get Permission (article level)

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles

Related Article in PubMed

Related Article in Google Scholar

Create Citation Alert via Google Reader