Dosage modification should be based on the decision related to prolonged or short-term management [
5-
7]. All forms of drug such as divalproex sodium, sodium valproate and valproic acid distribute comparable amounts of the dynamic valproate ion. Dissimilarities in the rate of dissolution and following bioavailability of the VPA forms of divalproex sodium necessitate dissimilar overall daily doses of the drug to attain similar steadystate plasma levels of valproic acid. At recommended serum concentrations of 50 - 100 mg/mL, it is a widely used to treat epilepsy and bipolar disorder. Peak plasma concentrations or Cmax are reached in 1 - 4 hours after oral form of the sodium salt or VPA, in 3 - 5 hours for delayed-release, and in 4 - 17 hours subsequent to extended-release tablets. More than a few days might be requested to see the complete property of a given prescribed amount. In complex partial seizures, simple and complex absence seizures, the starting dosage of all of the VPA products is 10 - 15 mg/kg/day with a maximum dosage of 60 mg/kg/day and for migraine prophylaxis is 500 - 1000 mg/day. For chronic prescription related to bipolar disorders a minimum of 250 mg/day to 3000 mg/day with a vigilant monitoring of drug concentration in blood might be the option for a suitable treatment. For acute treatment of bipolar disorders the minimum dose would be 1000 mg a day.
Table 1 shows the kinetic behavior of this drug after prescription. With a half-life of 9 - 16 hours, it appears that the drug follows a variable absorption pattern with a protein binding (PB) concentration-dependent, from 90% at 40 mg/mL to 81.5% at 130 mg/mL. The pattern of metabolism is 30 - 50% and over 40% glucuronide conjugation and mitochondrial β-oxidation respectively. It seems hemodialysis could decrease concentration of drug in whole blood by 20%. Therefore patients with hemodialysis might need higher doses of drug to control seizure attack. Epileptic convulsions could be apparent by a range of clinical norms. Suitable management should be based on individualized epileptic patient that usually take into explanation related to all the three features of analysis of seizure category and epilepsy pattern, reality of comorbidity interaction between associated drugs. For more than 4 decades VPA stipulate in clinical practice as an anticonvulsant to control seizures in forms of tonic-clonic (grand mal), complex partial and juvenile myoclonic. Published report by International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) authorizes the efficiency and value of ethosuximide and VPA for children with absence seizures as initial monotherapy [
2-
12]. Karlov et al. [
11] reported a prescription based on valproate in dose 15 - 25 mg/kg/day and levetiracetam in dose 20 - 25 mg/kg/day that were used in the treatment of 23 patients with juvenile myoclonic, juvenile absence, and convulsive idiopathic generalized and children absence epilepsy. Optimistic modifications in the incidence of convulsions and epileptic action observed in the electroencephalography (EEG) [
11].
Valproate is the drug of main option for management in juvenile absence epilepsies (JAE) accompanied by generalized tonic-clonic seizures. If the patient does not appropriately answer, then prescription of lamotrigine or ethosuximide is suggested [
13]. However in treatment of cortical myoclonus levetiracetam is first-line treatment but VPA and clonazepam are regularly prescribed. The efficacy of VPA in cortical-subcortical myoclonus has been reported recently by Caviness and Brown [
14]. In cortical myoclonus, the most effective drugs are VPA, clonazepam, levetiracetam and piracetam. For corticalsubcortical myoclonus, VPA is the drug of choice. Lamotrigine can be used either alone or in combination with VPA. Levetiracetam or zonisamide can also be used as adjunct therapy with VPA [
14,
15]. The risk of seizures differs between 60% and 100% with low grade gliomas and between 40% and 60% in glioblastomas. An innovative and thrilling imminent is the likely involvement of VPA to prolonged survival, mainly in glioblastomas [
16]. For the treatment of absence epilepsy, it seems that older AEDs such as ethosuximide and VPA are more efficacious than newer AEDs. Due to reduced side effects, ethosuximide remains the first line treatment for childhood absence epilepsy [
2-
4].
According to expert opinion published recently, VPA might be the most effective drug in idiopathic generalized epilepsies. It should be avoided in women of childbearing age due to its safety profile. In patients with secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, AEDs for which the impact on this seizure type has been formally assessed and which have established superior efficiency than placebo might preferentially be used, such as lacosamide, perampanel and topiramate [
17]. In juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, lack of response to VPA was noted in 19% of patients [
18]. Corresponding psychiatric disorders demonstrated major association with lack of answer to VPA. The neuroprotective properties of drug have been established in numerous forms of severe central nervous system damages, such as stroke, traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury. The drug preserves the brain from impairment development via anti-inflammatory, antiapoptotic and neurotrophic effects [
19-
22]. Elderly are usually more at risk to the adverse effects of VPA than younger adults. Therefore, in this population, the drug should be started at low dosages and titrated gradually. Some of the most troublesome side effects of VPA could be mentioned as: sedation, cognitive side effects and osteoporosis. VPA-drug interactions should be given particular deliberation. It is well known that the pharmacokinetics of all AEDs is altered in the elderly. As renal and metabolic clearance changes in elderly patients, therefore envisaging pharmacokinetic variation seems to be difficult. It seems that there is no agreement on whether VPA should be thought as the ideal first-line management in the elderly [
20].
Table 2 shows some of the most clinical properties related to VPA. Due to interand intra- individual variation drug dosing depends on maintenance or acute application in relation to drug concentration monitoring. In combination therapy as a mood stabilizer, lithium might offer a proper synergistic effect. For glutamate excitotoxicity [
21], amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [
23], Huntington’s disease [
24], valproate might provide better clinical efficacy. Following severe intake of a large dose of VPA, central nervous system depression, could be categorized from drowsiness to coma. Respiratory depression, although not a common finding, has also been reported. A vigilant dosing of amitriptyline with VPA co medication is recommended since this addition may guide to a significant raise of amitriptyline serum level [
2-
4]. In combination with carbapenems, monitoring of VPA levels seems to be necessary [
25]. Simultaneous prescription with olanzapine significantly decreases serum concentrations of VPA. Smoking also decreases the levels of VPA [
26]. The prescription of this drug in pregnancy could increase the risk of spina bifida, cognitive impairments and many other defects by three times. VPA could increase the risk of autism. A high dose of folic acid is recommended for pregnant women. Second trimester ultrasound scans and alpha fetoprotein measurements seem to be necessary. The drug may have an effect on embryonic heart development and may be associated with congenital cardiovascular defects. The drug is an antagonist of folate and could cause neural tube defects that could lead to lower intelligence quotient scale (Iqs) [
27-
29].
The relationship of 25 (OH)D
3 levels with anticonvulsant showed that the possibility of vitamin D deficiency could be considered in pediatric patients taking anticonvulsants if they have mental retardation or developmental delay or if they have been taking anticonvulsants for more than 2 years or taking hepatic enzyme inducing drugs [
30]. Also there is a significant alteration in trace element status with VPA [
31]. A notably small concentration of histamine associates with drug resistance and specifies participation of the H1/H3 receptors [
32]. It seems that overweight patients with epilepsy treated with VPA are at superior possibility of metabolic syndrome than individuals who are just overweight. Therefore, the homeostasis model assessment index should be checked in overweight patients who obtain VPA treatment, rather than observing body weight only [
33].