1. Background
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic progressive metabolic disorder. It characterized by high blood glucose levels. It is estimated that 25% of the world population is affected by this disease. One therapeutic approach to treat diabetes is to retard the absorption of glucose through inhibition of enzymes, like α-glucosidase and α-amylase, in the digestive organs. Several α-glucosidase inhibitors have been isolated from medicinal plants like Cinnamomum zeylanicum [1], Salvia spinosa, Polygonum hyrcanicum [2] and Orthosiphon stamineus [3]. Also screening tests with lichens have demonstrated the frequent occurrence of metabolites with antibiotic, antimycobacterial, antiviral, anti-infammatory, analgesic, antiproliferative, antipyretic, and cytotoxic properties [4]. These medicinal compounds develop as an alternative drug with increased potency and lesser adverse effects than the existing drugs [5].
Aldehyde oxidase (AO) enzyme is involved in oxidative stress and oxidising of several important drugs like mercaptopurine, methotrexate, famciclovir, 6- azathioprine, quinine and quinidine. It is a cytosolic enzyme and belongs to the molybdenum hydroxylase family. It seems to be involved in hormone biosynthesis such as those of indole- 3-acetic acid and abscisic acid. AO with xanthine dehydrogenase/xanthine oxidase (XD/XO), collectively known as xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) [6, 7].
Despite a large number of natural antioxidant products, the investigation for new chemical entities with antioxidant activity still remains a burgeoning field. For this reason, lichens are an important source for new antioxidant agents. I hypothesized that antioxidant activity of lichens may decrease hyperglycaemia-induced oxidative stress and prevent the development of diabetic Caloplaca biatorina (A. Massal.) J. Steiner was investigated for the first time in the present study.
Lichen is a composite organism that arises from green algae or cyanobacteria or both. The fungal partners are mostly (98%) Ascomycota and the others belong to the Basidiomycota. Approximately 18,000 species of lichen have been described and identified worldwide. They are one of the slowest growing symbiotic associations. They have a variety of different growth forms as (1): Crustose, (2): Foliose and (3): Fruticose. They have an interesting chemistry and produce a large number of specific acids. For example, usnic acid which is a very active substance is used in pharmaceutical preparations. This acid is a cell division regulator of autotrophic partner of lichen symbiosis-photobiont. Generally, lichens produce two different types of metabolites; primary and secondary. Secondary metabolites are produced by the fungal partner. These compounds are mainly depsides, depsidones, dibenzo-furans, xanthones and terpene derivatives. These unique metabolites sometimes make more than 30% of the dry mass of thallus. Some of these compounds are utilized in drugs that can be more effective than antibiotics such as penicillin. These secondary metabolites have shown a wide range of biological properties including antibiotic, antimycobacterial, antiviral, anti-protozoan, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antipyretic, antiproliferative, cytotoxic effects and antioxidant activities [4-8].
2. Methods
All media and materials used in this experimental study were obtained from (Merck Co. Darmstadt, Germany). Antibiotics were obtained from (Mast Group Ltd., UK). The strains were obtained from Persian type culture collection (PTCC, Tehran, Iran) or American type culture collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA).
2.1. Lichen Material
The specimens of C. biatorina were collected in April 2006 from Mehran, Ilam province of Iran. The lichen was identified by Prof. Harrie Sipman, Curator of Lichens at the Botanischer Garten and Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem and a voucher specimen was deposited for the lichen (B-6346).
2.2. Preparation of the Lichen Extracts
Dry ground thalli of the investigated lichens (10 g) were extracted using methanol (250 mL) in a Soxhlet extractor (model 6718, Ace Glass Inc., Vineland, NJ.). The extracts were filtered and then concentrated under reduced pressure in a rotary evaporator (Model RE 200). Resulted extracts were stored at -18°C in dark until analysis. The extracts were dissolved in 5% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) for the experiments [8].
2.3. Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
Compounds were characterized by the standardized TLC method [9-11] and gradient-elution high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [12].
2.4. Total Phenolic Content (TPC)
TPC of the extract was determined by the method of Folin–Ciocalteu according to a reported procedure [13].
2.5. Total Flavonoid Content (TFC)
TFC of the extracts was determined using the aluminium chloride colorimetric [14].
2.6. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity
The DPPH radical scavenging capacity of the extract was evaluated using a previously published method [15, 16].
2.7. Ferric Reducing Power
The procedure was applied by the method of Zhao et al. [17].
2.8. α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity (AGI)
AGI of C. biatorina was evaluated according a previously described method [18].
2.9. α-Amylase Inhibitory Activity (AAI)
α-amylase (AA) inhibition assay was used according to Giancarlo et al. [19].
2.10. Aldehyde Oxidase Inhibitory Activity (AOIA)
AOI of the extract was evaluated using a previously published method [20].
2.11. Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitory Activity (XOIA)
XOIAs of the lichen samples were measured spectrophotometrically [20]. Prior to any assay, the substrate and the enzyme solutions were prepared. The reaction mixture contained an 80 mM sodium pyrophosphate buffer (pH = 8.5), 0.120 mM xanthine, and 0.1 unit of XO. XO activity was determined by measurement of uric acid production at 295 nm The methanolic dried extract, initially dissolved and diluted in the buffer, was incorporated in the enzyme assay to assess its inhibitory activity at a final concentration of 200 μg/mL. Results were expressed as average values of three independent assays. A negative control (blank; 0% XO inhibition activity) was prepared containing the assay mixture without the extract. Quercetin was used as a positive control in the assay mixture. The reaction was monitored in the presence of lichen samples (10 - 500 µg) and the results were compared with the inhibitory effect of positive control (0.5 - 5 µg). All the experiments were performed using a Shimadzu spectrophotometer (2550 UV/VIS).
2.12. Determination of Antibacterial Activity
Three-positive bacteria [Bacillus cereus (PTCC 1015), B. subtilis (ATCC 1399) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25213)], three Gram-negative bacteria [Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 1047), Escherichia coli (PTCC 2405) and Salmonella typhi PTCC 1609] and two fungi [Aspergillus niger (PTCC 5012) and Candida albicans (PTCC 5027) were used as test organisms. All the used microbial strains were obtained from the Pasteur institute of Iran. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) were determined by the broth microdilution method with using 96-well micro-titer plates as described previously [21]. A series of dilutions with concentrations ranging from 63 to 1000 mg mL-1 for extracts were used in the experiment against every microorganism tested. Gentamicin and nystatin were used as positive control in antibacterial and antifungal assays, respectively. A DMSO solution was used as a negative control for the solvents influence. All assays were done in triplicate.
2.13. Brine Shrimp Lethality Assay (BSLA)
Brine shrimp lethality test was used to evaluate the toxicity of lichen's extracts. Brine shrimp larvae toxicity assays were performed according to the method published previously [22]. The eggs of Artemia salina were hatched in a flask containing artificial seawater (3.6% w/v salt) for 48 hours, at room temperature. The test samples were dissolved in DMSO. Ten larvae were collected and added to the two fold serially diluted solutions with concentration range of 31 - 1000 µg/mL in the test tubes with the help of a pasteur pipette. The vials were kept for 24 hours. Larvae were considered dead if they did not exhibit any internal or external movement during the several seconds of observation. After 48 hours, a magnifying glass was used to count the number of dead and surviving larvae and the mortality percentage was calculated. DMSO and potassium dichromate were taken as negative and positive controls respectively. LC50 values were expressed as mean of triplicates ± SEM.
2.14. Statistical Analysis
All the results were expressed as mean ± SEM for three experiments in each. All the grouped data were analyzed by SPSS V.21 software. Statistical comparisons were estimated by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan’s post-hoc test for multiple comparisons with control. P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Pearson’s bivariate correlation test was carried out to calculate correlation coefficients (r) between the content of total phenolic and the DPPH radical scavenging activity.
3. Results
3.1. HPLC and TLC Studies
Five chemical substance as (1): Parietin, (2): 1H-Isoindole-1, 3 (2H)-dione, 2-buty l-4, 5, 6, 7-tetrahydro-, (3): Emodin, (4): 1,8-Dihydroxy-3-(hydroxymethyl)-6- methoxy-9.10-anthracenedione, and (5): Rhein were detected as the major compounds of the extract. These compounds are reported for the first time from this lichen.
3.2. Total Phenol and Flavonoid Contents
The amount of total phenolic compounds was determined as the pyrocatechol equivalent using an equation obtained from a standard pyrocatechol graph (y = 0.0021x - 0.0092, R2 = 0.9934). So that high absorbance was indicated high reducing power. Measured values of absorbance varied from 0.5 (concentration 0.2 mg mL-1) to 1.98 (concentration 1.5 mg mL-1). As shown in Table 1, excellent flavonoid content was found in extracts of C. biatorina (128.17 μg of rutin equivalent in 1.5 mg mL-1 concentration). This tested extract exhibited high radical scavenging activity and ferric reducing power with the great amount of phenolic content. High phenolic content was identified in methanol extract of the lichen (189.98 μg of pyrocatechol equivalent in mg mL-1 concentration). Correlation coefficient between the phenolic compound content of the tested extracts and free radical scavenging activity was r = 0.949.
| Concentration, mg/mL | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavonoid, TFC; mg QEs/g dry wt. | 45.12 ± 0.01 | 52.18 ± 0.01 | 108.12 ± 0.03 | 128.17 ± 0.02 | 0.001 |
| Phenol, TPC; mg GAEs/g dry wt. | 86.98 ± 0.02 | 105.32 ± 0.01 | 148.45 ± 0.05 | 189.98 ± 0.02 | 0.001 |
| DPPH, IC50 µg/mL | 34.02 ± 0.01 | 48.12± 0.03 | 98.54 ± 0.02 | 110.57 ± 0.01 | 0.001 |
| SRP | 0.49 ± 0.01 | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.01 | 1.09 ± 0.01 | 0.001 |
Total Phenol and Flavonoid Content and DPPH Assay, and Slop of Trend Line in Reducing Power Assay (SRP) of Caloplaca biatorinaa
3.3. Antioxidant Activity
3.3.1. Radical Scavenging Activity and Ferric Reducing Power (SRP)
The antioxidant activity of the extract of C. biatorina was demonstrated by DPPH and FRAPS assays (Table 1). The extract showed the high DPPH radical scavenging activity with an IC50 value of 110.57 µg/mL (in 1.5 mg mL-1 concentration). Total phenolic and flavonoid contents of the extracts studied in the present work have good correlation with their DPPH radical scavenging activities (r2 = 0.953, P < 0.05, and r2 = 0.961, P < 0.05, respectively). In this research, the FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power) assay was used to evaluate the reducing potential of C. biatorina. SRP was calculated for tested sample (Table 1).
3.4. Enzyme Inhibitory Activity
3.4.1. α-Glucosidase Inhibition
The results showed that extract of the lichen has high α-glucosidase inhibitory activity (17.12 µg/mL in 1.5 mg mL-1 concentration) which is comparable with standard inhibitor acarbose (16.9 µg/mL) (Table 2). There is a very good accordance between phenolic and flavonoid contents with α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of the extracts of C. biatorina (r2 = 0.911, P < 0.05, and r2 = 0.947, P < 0.05, respectively) that demonstrates these metabolites could be responsible compounds for the observed inhibitory activities.
3.4.2. α-Amylase Inhibition
In the present study, the inhibitory activity of C. biatorina on α-amylase was weak and it did not reach the 50% inhibition level of enzyme activity (Table 2).
| Concentration, mg/mL | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | P Value | Quercetin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| α-Glucosidase, AGI; IC50 µg/mL | 100.17 ± 0.02 | 83.12 ± 0.03 | 41.18 ± 0.01 | 17.12 ± 0.01 | 0.001 | 16.9 ± 0.02 |
| α-Amylase, AA; IC50 µg/mL | 340.67 ± 0.81 | 318.12 ± 0.67 | 314.01 ± 0.70 | 308.02 ± 0.90 | 0.001 | 10.05 ± 0.80 |
| Aldehyde oxidase, AOI; IC50 µg/mL | 400.98 ± 0.02 | 169.45 ± 0.05 | 111.32± 0.01 | 40.09 ± 0.02 | 0.001 | 1.26 ± 0.03 |
| Xanthine oxidase, XOI; IC50 µg/mL | 186.78 ± 0.01 | 89.98 ± 0.02 | 32.87± 0.03 | 11.02 ± 0.03 | 0.001 | 1.17 ± 0.09 |
3.4.3. Aldehyde Oxidase Inhibition (AOI)
The extract in 1.5 mg mL-1 concentration showed a significant AOI (IC50 = 40.09 µg/mL) and was found to be a stronger inhibitor (IC50 = 400.98 µg/mL) (Table 2). The extract of C. biatorina displayed a concentration-dependent AOI inhibitory activity.
3.4.4. Xanthine Oxidase Inhibition (XOI)
In this study, the lichen extract in 1.5 mg mL-1 concentration showed significant xanthine oxidase inhibitory activity (IC50 = 11.02 µg/mL) (Table 2).
3.5. Antimicrobial Activity
The result of screening the lichen extract for antimicrobial activity is summarized in Table 3. It was found that the inhibition zone of tested bacteria against extracts have changed between 7 - 31.2 mm. Among all the tested bacteria minimum activity was observed against Staphylococcus aureus (14 mm, MIC = 500, MBC = 500) and maximum activity was demonstrated against Bacillus cereu (33.2 mm, MIC = 125, MBC = 250) in 1.5 concentration of the extract. The result showed that standard antibiotics significantly had less activity than the lichen extract (Table 3).
| Mean (Average) Inhibition Zone, mmc | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | Fungi | ||||||||
| Bacillus cereus | Bacillus subtilis | Staphylococcus aureus | Escherichia coli | Salmonella typhi | Aspergillus niger | Candida albicans | Dreschlera turcica | Fusarium verticillioides | |
| 0.2d | 10 ± 0.15 | 8 ± 0.61 | 7 ± 0.4 | 9 ± 0.5 | 7 ± 0.4 | 11 ± 0.1 | 6 ± 0 | 9 ± 0.34 | 7 ± 0.45 |
| 0.5 | 15 ± 0.30 | 10 ± 0.02 | 9 ± 0.21 | 12 ± 0.21 | 9.01 ± 0.4 | 14 ± 0.21 | 6 ± 0 | 14 ± 0.16 | 12 ± 0.31 |
| 1 | 21 ± 0.01 | 16 ± 0.12 | 11 ± 0.49 | 13±0.19 | 14.1 ± 0.4 | 18 ± 0.51 | 6 ± 0 | 18 ± 0.18 | 16 ± 0.80 |
| 1.5 | 31.2 ± 0.22 | 28 ± 0.01 | 14 ± 0.9 | 17±0.43 | 16.9 ± 0.4 | 23 ± 0.18 | 6 ± 0 | 23 ± 0.09 | 19 ± 0.01 |
| Standarde | Gentamicin | Streptomycin | Clindamycin | Gentamicin | Streptomycin | -f | - | - | - |
| Clindamycin | 25.33 ± 0.57 | 25.00 ±00 | 9.66 ± 0.12 | 19.66 ± 0.43 | 8.66 ± 15 | - | - | - | - |
| DMSO | 6 ± 0 | 6 ± 0 | 6 ± 0 | 6 ± 0 | 6 ± 0 | - | - | - | - |
| Nystatin | - | - | - | - | - | 15 ± 0.12 | 15.5 ± 0.26 | 22 ± 0.57 | 16 ± 0.33 |
| DMSO | 6 ± 0 | 6 ± 0 | 6 ± 0 | 6 ± 0 | 6 ± 0 | ||||
| P Value | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
3.6. Brine Shrimp Larvae Toxicity
The LC50 value for the percentage of mortality brine shrimp treated with C. biatorina extract as indicated by the regression equation (R2 = 0.8520) was found to be 9001.11 μg/mL (in 1.5 mg mL-1 concentration). The value was significantly (P < 0.05) higher when compared to the standard potassium dichromate (LC50 = 163.09 μg/mL) (Table 4). In addition there was also a significant correlation (P < 0.05) between the concentration of the extracts and the percentage of mortality value, it was found to be increased with increase in the concentration for the lichen tested and the standard.
| Concentration of the extract, mg/mL | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 | Potassium Dichromatea | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| brine shrimp toxicity BSLA; LC50 µg/mL | 5008.02 ± 0.02 | 6001.12 ± 0.02 | 7009.91 ± 0.02 | 9001.11 ± 0.09 | 163.09 ± 4 | 0.001 |
Brine Shrimp Toxicity of the Extract of Caloplaca biatorina
4. Discussion
In summary the present results showed that the extract with the DPPH radical scavenging and brine shrimp toxicity (IC50 = 91.11 µg/mL) activities, has a strong α-glucosidase (IC50 = 17.12 µg/mL), aldehyde oxidase (IC50 = 40.09 µg/mL) and xanthine oxidase (IC50 = 11.02 µg/mL) inhibitory properties. Also phytochemical screening of the extract shows the presence of parietin, emodin, 1,8-dihydroxy-3-(hydroxymethyl)-6- methoxy-9.10-anthracenedione and rhein.
Lichens are valuable natural resources and are used as remedies in folk medicines. These medicines are getting more importance in the treatment of diabetes as they are free from side effects and less expensive when compared to synthetic hypoglycemic agents. Prior to the patent of novel α-glucosidase inhibitors from lichens by Thadani et al. there were no reports on the anti-hyperglycemic effects of the lichen metabolites [23]. Up till now, about 18 metabolites such as 3-β-acetoxyurs-11-en-13 β, 28-olide, 3-O-Acetyl-betulinic acid, Betulinic acid and Ursolic acid (from Rhododendron), 1 - 5, triterpenoid zeorin (from Cladonia) and salazinic acid, sekikaic acid and usnic acid (from Ramalina) have shown potent α-glucosidase inhibitory activity [4, 24, 25]. Also in some research, anthraquinones have been shown to be responsible for the strong α-glucosidase inhibitory activities [26, 27]. So, in this study the high inhibition of glucosidase by the lichen C. biatorina could be mainly due to the presence of phenolic constituents like anthraquinones compounds (e. g. parietin, emodin, 1,8-Dihydroxy-3-(hydroxymethyl)-6- methoxy-9.10-anthracenedione, and rhein) and other secondary metabolites (e. g., 2-buty l-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro- 1H-Isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione). However they could not be tested because of the scarcity of the samples. Therefore, the lichen could be subjected to extensive bio-assay guided chromatographic separation and purification processes for isolation of active molecules for the discovery of novel therapeutic agents. Also the mechanism by which C. biatorina exerted action may be due to its action on carbohydrate binding regions of α- glucosidase enzyme, α-amylase, endoglucanases that catalyse hydrolysis of the internal α-1, 4 glucosidic linkages in starch and other related polysaccharides have also been targets for the suppression of postprandial hyperglycemia. The mechanism should be verified by further studies.
To date lichens as Ramalina, Parmotrema, Usnea, Everniastrum and Pseudotinctorum caused higher inhibition of enzyme activity in diabetes mellitus [28]. To the best of my knowledge there is no previous report on antidiabetic properties of Caloplaca and this is the first report that showed higher α-glucosidase inhibitory activity for C. biatorina than potassium dichromate as standard. So it is initial steps in new antidiabetic drug discovery, but further studies are necessary to verify the safety and efficacy of this therapy.
AO (Aldehyde oxidase) is a protein belonging to the family of molybdo- and tungsten-enzymes. This enzyme is involved several important drugs like methotrexate, famciclovir, quinine and azathioprine [2]. To the best of my knowledge this study is the first research on the AOI activity of lichens and previous reports on the xanthine oxidase inhibitor activity hadn’t been done. In this study C. biatorina had the best aldehyde oxidase inhibitory activity at concentration 1.5 mg mL-1, IC50 = 40.09 µg/mL, followed by inhibition, IC50 = 400.98 µg/mL, of the extract at 1.5 mg mL-1 concentration. The last studied enzyme as XO (Xanthine oxidase) is a flavoprotein, which catalyses the oxidation of hypoxanthine to xanthine and generates superoxide and uric acid. It has been shown that enzyme inhibitors may be useful for the treatment of the common metabolic disorders as hyperuricemia and gout. There are a numerous studies which evaluate the potential of terrestrial plants as XO inhibitors [29-31]. However, this research is the first report on the XOI activity of lichens and provided evidences indicated that the extract is able to exhibit high inhibition on XO activity (IC50 = 11.02 µg/mL). Purwantiningsih and Purwantini concluded that the inhibition of xanthine oxidase activity of plant extracts is contributed by phenols and anthraquinones compounds and the present phytochemical screening study revealed C. biatorina contains phenols and anthraquinones [32].
Brine shrimp lethality bioassay is an efficient, rapid and inexpensive assay for testing the bioactivity of lichen extracts. It is an excellent choice for elementary toxicity researches based on the ability to kill laboratory-cultured Artemia salina. In the present investigation like previous researchers [4, 33], most of the antimicrobial and antioxidant active lichen species are not toxic against Artemia larvae which could be an indication of being non-toxic lichen species. In other words, in the current study, the brine shrimp lethality bioassay is performed to assess the preliminary toxicity of C. biatorina. Even though the brine shrimp test does not provide any adequate information regarding the mechanism of action of the lichen extracts it is useful to assess the toxicity and indicates the cytotoxic nature of the lichen and warrant further investigation.
Results of this study showed in vitro pharmacological properties (e.g. enzymes inhibitory, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities) of the extract. Further in vivo experiments are necessary to investigate it.
4.1. Conclusions
It was shown that the lichen C. biatorina with high anthraquinones (e. g. parietin, rhein, emodin and 1,8-Dihydroxy-3-(hydroxymethyl)-6- methoxy-9.10-anthracenedione) content can serve as a good inhibitor of xanthine oxidase (XO), aldehyde oxidase (AO) and α-glucosidase enzymes. Also, it revealed the medicinal importance as antimicrobial and antioxidant agent. Whether these effects on enzymes and microorganisms have received much attention from researchers, and it would be of value to perform more studies using animal model for human therapy. Also further work needs to be carried out on the lichen in other to determine the active chemical constituents responsible for the observed activities.
