In this cross-sectional study, a total of 1024 Iranian subjects living in Hamedan, include, staff of Islamic Azad University of Hamedan and subjects who referred to Ekbatan hospital in Hamedan during the period of 6 months from March to August 2011 were examined. They were randomly selected. Taking blood samples and questionnaire completion was performed by well-trained nurses. Exclusion criteria for entry into the study were smoking habit, sustained hypertension (systolic blood pressure 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure 90 mmHg in clinic and daytime ambulatory), diabetes mellitus (fasting glucose 126 mg/dL or hemoglobin A1c > 6.2%), hyper cholesterolemia (serum LDL cholesterol 160 mg/dL), hyper triglyceridaemia (serum triglyceride 400 mg/dL), renal failure (serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL and blood urea nitrogen > 30 mg/dL), heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, hematological disorders, acute or chronic infection, cancer and hepatic disease and smokers. Due to history and complete blood cell count and other tests, absence of infectious disease was confirmed by a general practitioner (there were some types of this test in patients’ medical records and other required tests, were performed by researchers. Among 1,024 people who referred, only 486 were eligible prior to the study, the participants signed an informed consent form.
The checklist was used to measure instances such as the extent of abdominal obesity (Waist circumference), weight, and height (measuring body mass index), WBC and platelet count. To measure the waist circumstance (the area from the lowest rib to the tip) a plastic meter was used.
The nature of the screening was described to the participants. The anthropometric variables such as weight, height and waist circumference were also measured as described below. In the light of the guidelines described by the National Institutes of Health in 2000, waist circumference was measured by an elastic tape at the top of the iliac crest running parallel to the floor at the end of normal expiration.
According to the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study after following studies over 30 provinces, waist circumference in the Iranian subjects sectional, over at least 89 (cm) in men and 91 (cm) in women is considered as abdominal obesity [
12].
The measurement of weight and height is an objective starting point for the health and nutritional assessment. A clinical assessment beings by anthropometric measurement, namely weight, height, and BMI. This can provide important first clues of a client’s nutritional status. Following a BMI determination, terms such as Normal weight, underweight, overweight, and obese are used to describe the client. The WHO has developed BMI classification aimed for international use. Weight classification based on BMI is shown in
Table 1 [
13]. Accordingly, the Body mass index (BMI) was measured by multiplying the weight of each participant by their height (weight/height
2 in kg/m
2). Obesity is defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m
2. To calculate the body weight, the subjects were asked to put on the clothes provided by the center, the weight of which was reduced from the total body weight. Blood was drawn from an ante-cubital vein of each person while they were in a sitting position. A tourniquet was closed for less than 1 minute. White blood cells (WBCs) in a blood sample which was collected in tube with tripotassium EDTA tubes were counted by an automatic blood counter after two hours of vain puncture.
| Variables | BMI (kg/m2) | Obesity Class |
|---|
| Underweight | < 18.5 | |
| Normal | 18.5 - 24.9 | |
| Overweight | 25.0 - 29.9 | increased |
| Obesity | 30.0 - 34.9 | high |
| 35.0 - 39.9 | very high |
| Extreme Obesity- | 40.0 + | extremely high |
aNational heart, lung, and blood institute (NIH) [14].
A complete blood profile including WBC and Platelet counts was provided by an automated cell counter. In order to rule out any infection or underlying hematologic disorder, exclusion criteria were considered as people who have WBC count (< 3,800 or > 15,000 cells/mm
3), and platelets more than 500,000 cells/mm
3 [
15].
Reliability estimates fall between 0.95 and 1.00. To compare platelet counts and WBC levels in overweight and obese groups with those in the control group a general linear model with post hoc Scheffe comparisons were run. T-test was used to check the significance of differences in the platelets count in obese and non-obese subjects. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was run to estimate the association between BMI and platelet count after adjusting for age differences. Because of gender differences in baseline platelet counts. It was decided to analyze the data for males and females separately. Statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 16 was used to do the analyses. The descriptive Statistics included mean and standard deviation (SD). To measure the strength of association between BMI, WBC, and waist circumference, Pearson’s correlation was used. The significance level for all the analyses was set at P < 0.05.
The study included 486 Iranian subjects (232 women and 254 men) with an average age of 34.75 ± 8.1 years. Overall, 48.4% were normal weight, 31.7% were overweight, 11.4% were obese and 0.8% were morbidly obese, and 47.6% were abdominal obese.
Table 2 shows the main features of the study group. As the shows, shows, the WBC count was significantly higher in the obese group than it was in the control group (10.62 vs 6.17; P < 0.001). WBC was correlated with BMI in the obese group (P < 0.05).
| Variables | Men (n = 232) | Women (n = 254) |
|---|
| Age, y | 33.5 ± 8.2 | 36.01 ± 8.06 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.6 ± 3.6 | 25.7 ± 4.9 |
| Bmi > 30, % | 7.6 | 15.7 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 1.04 ± 0.5 | 89.3 ± 10.2 |
| Wbc | 6.78 ± 1.9 | 7.3 ± 1.77 |
| Neutrophil | 62.5 ± 7.2 | 57.3 ± 7.6 |
| Eosinophil | 1.88 ± 0.9 | 2.5 ± 1.3 |
| Lymphocyte | 34.7 ± 6.4 | 38.2 ± 6.9 |
| Monocyte | 2.91 ± 1.5 | 3.8 ± 6 |
| PLT | 258.4 ± 50.9 | 233.7 ± 43.8 |
| Variables | Men (n = 254) | Women (n = 232) |
|---|
| Normal body fat distribution without central obesity (n = 221 ) | Central body fat distribution (n = 33) | Normal body fat distribution without central obesity (n = 123 ) | Central body fat distribution (n = 109) |
|---|
| Platelet count, × 109/L) | 263 ± 45 | 302 ± 41c | 275 ± 48 | 296 ± 55c |
| White blood cells, × 1000 counts | 5.7 ± 4 | 8.5 ± 3c | 6.3 ± 6 | 7.1 ± 3c |
aP values derived from one-way ANOVA that evaluated the association between central obesity and several characteristics of the participants, after adjusting for age.
bP < 0.05 for the comparisons between participants with normal vs. central obesity.
cP < 0.01 for the comparisons between participants with normal vs. central obesity.
| Variables | Men (n =254) | Women (n = 232) |
|---|
| Normal weight (n = 126) | Overweight (n =83 ) | Obese (n =40 ) | Normal weight (n = 117) | Overweight (n =80 ) | Obese (n =2 ) |
|---|
| Platelet count, × 109/L | 242 ± 24 | 248 ± 26 | 278 ± 32 | 251 ± 36 | 265 ± 28c | 294 ± 22c |
| White blood cells, × 1000 counts | 6.7 ± 6 | 7.1 ± 2 | 8.3 ± 3c | 6.5±3 | 8.4 ± 3b | 9.8 ± 2c |
aP Values derived from one-way ANOVA that evaluated the association between general obesity and several characteristics of the participants, after adjusting for age.
bP < 0.05 for the comparisons between overweight or obese vs. normal weight objects.
cP < 0.01 for the comparisons between overweight or obese vs. normal weight objects.
Overall, 49.7% of men and 50.1% of women had normal weight while, 32.7% of men and 34.5% of female were overweight, and 15.7% of men and 0.8 of women were morbidly obese. Moreover 47.21% of women and 12.9% of men suffered from abdominal obesity.
Our data showed that the number of white blood cells was higher in individuals with high waist circumference) in female (P < 0.015) and in men (P < 0.001). Proportionate to BMI, platelet counts showed an increased in both gender. However, only in women, the number of platelets was significantly high in overweight (P = 0.005), and obesity (P < 0.0001), totally. The number of platelets was high and no significance difference was observed between the obese groups and the number of platelets compared to the normal weight subgroup after adjustment for age. With ANOVA, the number of platelets was always associated with BMI in women after adjustment for age (P = 0.013). In a stepwise regression analysis (age, sex and BMI change were the model variables), the change in BMI was the only predictor of the change in WBC count. Also a significant correlation was found between waist circumference and platelet counts (P < 0.0001) in both genders. Although the observed correlation was attenuated, it seemed to remain constant.