Study of ZUMS1 faculty members’ views on" faculty members’ assessment "

A Keykhaei; Ali Navidian; Mohammad Ali Tabasi; GH Sargazi

Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

The Official Journal of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences

Current Issue All Issues In Press Articles Accepted Manuscripts Search

Journal Information Boards and Committees Indexing and Listing Sources Journal Metrics Open Peer Review (OPR)Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement Contact Us Support Reviewer and AE Registration Form

APC

Authors Guide Submit Manuscript

Study of ZUMS1 faculty members’ views on" faculty members’ assessment "

Author(s):

A Keykhaei^1,*,

Ali Navidian²,

Mohammad Ali Tabasi³,

GH Sargazi¹

1Anesthesia dept, faculty of medicine, Zahedan University of medical sciences and health services, Zahedan, Iran.

2Nursing dept, faculty of nursing and midwifery education, Zahedan University of medical sciences and health services, Zahedan, Iran.

3Librarian ship dept, faculty of medicine, Zahedan University of medical sciences and health services, Zahedan, Iran.

Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences:Vol. 4, issue 3; e95329

Published online:Aug 08, 2019

Article type:Research Article

Received:Jul 01, 2002

Accepted:Jul 31, 2002

How to Cite:A KeykhaeiAli NavidianMohammad Ali TabasiGH SargaziStudy of ZUMS1 faculty members’ views on" faculty members’ assessment ".Zahedan J Res Med Sci.4(3):e95329.

Abstract

University faculty members can be evaluated in different ways. One of the most controversial
ways is an assessment, which is done by students.
The present cross sectional study investigates the views held by 83 basic sciences faculty
members on faculty members’ assessment in 1380. The required data gathered through
questionnaire and analyzed by SPSS statistical software.
Findings shows that 60.1% of the research population determined the assessment by students,
more than 20% of the total score which is followed by research plans with 20.8%, self assessment
with 19.5%, group manager with 16.9%, assessment by colleagues with 13%, taught unit courses
with 8.9% and finally assessment by Faculty education deputy with 5.2%.
Research population believes that: personal grudges 57.9%, dishonesty 85.6% and carelessness
89.1% affects assessment forms.
Finally, On the basis of the findings, it can be said that if we wish to have a reliable evaluation
of faculty members, we should use different assessment methods simultaneously.

Keywords

Faculty members

Assessment

Student

Fulltext

The full text of this article is available on the PDF file.

References

1.
The References of this article are available on the PDF file.

comments