Evaluation of the effect of load on pattern of motion in Stoop and Squat Lifting

Fateme Ghiasi; MR Noorbakhsh; Mahiar Salavati; N Maeroofi

Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

The Official Journal of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences

Current Issue All Issues In Press Articles Accepted Manuscripts Search

Journal Information Boards and Committees Indexing and Listing Sources Journal Metrics Open Peer Review (OPR)Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement Contact Us Support Reviewer and AE Registration Form

APC

Authors Guide Submit Manuscript

Evaluation of the effect of load on pattern of motion in Stoop and Squat Lifting

Author(s):

Fateme Ghiasi^1,*,

MR Noorbakhsh²,

Mahiar Salavati³,

N Maeroofi⁴

1Physiotherapy dept, paramedical school, Zahedan University of medical sciences and health services, Zahedan, Iran.

2Physiotherapy dept, welfair and rehabilitation school, Tehran, Iran.

3Physiotherapy dept, welfair and rehabilitation school, Tehran, Iran

4Rehabilitation school, Iran University of medical sciences and health services, Tehran, Iran.

Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences:Vol. 4, issue 2; e95339

Published online:Jun 21, 2002

Article type:Research Article

Received:Jun 01, 2002

Accepted:Jun 16, 2002

How to Cite:Fateme GhiasiMR NoorbakhshMahiar SalavatiN MaeroofiEvaluation of the effect of load on pattern of motion in Stoop and Squat Lifting.Zahedan J Res Med Sci.4(2):e95339.

Abstract

Reports of interactive between lumbar spine and hip movement vary for stoop & squat,
loading conditions. This study analysis two groups of subjects (45 subjects) during stoop &
squat lifting with loaded & unloaded. A Three-Dimentional Optoelectric Motion Analysis
System was used to measure the amount of lumbar spine and hip motion during stoop and
squat lifting. Each subject performed stoop and squat lifting with and without weight.
Individuals with loaded tended to move from lumbar spine greater than those with
unloaded, especially in the squat lifting (loaded ROM lumbar spine =23.7 & unloaded ROM
lumbar spine= 15.1). Individuals with loaded tended to move from the lumbar spine joint
smaller than those with unloaded especially in the stoop lifting (loaded ROM lumbar spine
=14 & unloaded ROM lumbar spine= 22.2).
There was a measurable different between two group subject during stoop & squat lifting
with loaded & unloaded. Individuals with loaded tended to move from lumbar spine earlier
than those with unloaded, especially in the squat lifting. Individuals with loaded tended to
move from the hip joint and ankle joint earlier than those with unloaded especially in the
squat lifting. Individuals with loaded tended to move from lumbar spine smaller than those
with unloaded, especially in the stoop lifting.

Keywords

Fulltext

The full text of this article is available on the PDF file.

References

1.
The References of this article are available on the PDF file.

comments