Abstract
Background:
Although the detrimental effects of advancing maternal age on fertility and reproduction have been recognized, there is a controversy regarding the impact of paternal age on male fertility.Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of paternal age on assisted reproductive outcomes in infertile couples with different male infertility factors.Methods:
It was a cross-sectional study on 285 couples at Alzahra Hospital from 2017 to 2019. The exclusion criteria were couples with female factor infertility. Patients were divided into four groups of normozoospermia, oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia, and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia based on the World Health Organization criteria. To evaluate the effect of age, another grouping was done according to the paternal age (< 25, 25 - 35, 35 - 45, and > 45 y).Results:
Our study showed that the negative effect of advancing age on male fertility can be seen in infertility factors of oligozoospermia and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia. A declined fertilization rate associated with aging was seen in all four groups, but the low embryo development rate was significant only in the oligozoospermia group (P = 0.01). The poor embryo quality related to advancing paternal age was observed in oligozoospermia (grade C; P = 0.001 and grade D; P = 0.005) and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (grade D; P = 0.01) groups. Additionally, the success rate of biochemical and clinical pregnancy decreased in the oligozoospermia (P = 0.01) and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (P = 0.02) groups with advancing male age.Conclusions:
Our findings showed a declining likelihood of fertility in men with advancing age. Specifically, we observed the detrimental effect of age on fertilization, embryo quality, and biochemical and clinical pregnancy rate in oligozoospermia and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia groups during intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.Keywords
Male Infertility Paternal Age Fertilization Embryo Quality Pregnancy
1. Background
Age is one of the most important malefactors in male fertility potential (1). There are many studies on the negative effects of elevated maternal age on reproduction, such as declined pregnancy rate, weak oocyte quality, and increased embryo aneuploidies (2). However, contradictory results have been reported about the effect of paternal age on fertility potentials such as sperm parameters and reproductive outcomes. For example, some studies reported that seminal volume, concentration, motility, and morphology of sperm were decreased with increasing paternal age (3), while others did not (4). The possible effects of male aging have been reported on assisted reproductive outcomes via sperm DNA damage (5), increasing sperm DNA methylation (6), production of excessive reactive oxygen species (7), and influence on spermatogenesis (8). Although the effect of maternal age on fertility potential is well recognized, it is more difficult to determine the effect of paternal age on fertility. Therefore, there are contradictory results about the association between paternal age and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes. It has been reported that increasing paternal age has been involved in abnormal reproductive and genetic outcomes (9) and decreased live birth rates (10), while other reports have shown no association between male aging and pregnancy outcomes (11). Due to the limited number of studies, there remains no consensus on the effect of male aging on ART outcomes when Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) cycles are performed.
2. Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of paternal age on fertility, especially standard semen parameters and assisted reproductive outcomes (e.g., fertilization rate, development rate of embryos, embryo quality, biochemical pregnancy, and clinical pregnancy rate). Furthermore, we investigated whether different infertility factors of men with advancing age directly affects the reproductive potential of men in assisted reproductive techniques.
3. Methods
3.1. Study Population
A randomized cross-sectional study was conducted on 285 infertile couples with male factor infertility attending the Alzahra Educational and Remedial Center (IVF center) from May 2017 to February 2019. Women had a mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of 23.5 ± 4.3, normal clinical history, and maternal age < 38 years, and received the same antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol. Men with similar BMI were also included in this study. The exclusion criteria were men taking hormone medications, with diabetes, other diseases (e.g., cryptorchidism, testicular torsion, or orchitis), or/and past surgery in the reproductive system that may have influenced the semen quality. The couples with female factor infertility were also excluded from this study.
3.2. Semen Analysis
Semen samples were obtained from participants and collected in standard plastic containers after 3 - 4 days of sexual abstinence. The incubated semen samples were liquefied for 15 - 30 min after ejaculation. The semen sample parameters (volume, morphology, concentration, and motility) were analyzed according to the World Health Organization, 2010 (12). According to the World Health Organization criteria (12), the semen samples were divided into four groups: (I) Normozoospermia (n = 74; sperm concentration > 15 million/mL, progressive motility > 32%, and normal morphology > 4%) but with low semen volume (< 0.5 mL); (II) Oligozoospermia (n = 16; sperm concentration < 15 million/ml); (III) asthenozoospermia (n = 137; progressive motility < 32%); and (IV) Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (n = 58; sperm concentration < 15 million/ml, progressive motility < 32%, and normal morphology < 4%). The samples within each group were divided based on paternal age (13): a, < 25 year-old; b, 25 - 35 year-old; c, 35-45 year-old; and d, > 45 year-old. The density gradient centrifugation method (90 and 45% SpermGrade, Vitrolife, Sweden) was performed to wash the semen samples.
3.3. ART Procedures
The protocol of long luteal suppression was used for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. In this method, a GnRHa (Superfact, Ferring, Germany) combined with HMG (Menogon, Ferring, Germany) or recombinant FSH (Gonal-F, Serono, Switzerland) was used. After the observation of at least three follicles with a diameter of more than 18 mm, 10000 IU HCG (Choriomon, IBSA, Switzerland) was used to induce ovulation. The ICSI method was performed to fertilize retrieved follicles using an inverted microscope (Olympus IX70, Tokyo, Japan). Injected oocytes were cultured and incubated in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C. After 16 h - 18 h of microinjection, fertilization was assessed with the observation of two pronuclei (2PN). The grading of the 2PN zygote was performed based on the Scott et al. (14) scoring system. Also, 2 - 3 days after microinjection, the classification of the embryo was done according to the Ebner et al. (15) scoring system. In this system, the classification of the embryo was performed based on embryo morphology as follows: grade A, regular cells without fragmentation; grade B, cells with lower than 25% fragmentation; grade C, cells with fragmentation between 25 and 50%, and grade D, cells with fragmentation higher than 50%. Embryo transfer was done as intrauterine 2 - 3 days after microinjection. Biochemical and clinical pregnancy was defined as increased serum b-hCG (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin) concentration two weeks after embryo transfer (ET) and the observation of intrauterine sac with heart function four weeks after ET, respectively. The pregnancy loss spontaneously after the observation of pregnancy by ultrasound was determined as abortion.
3.4. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The effect of age on ART outcomes was analyzed using the chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
4. Results
In this study, 285 patients under in vitro fertilization ICSI cycles were assessed. The female age and BMI were 20 - 38 year-old and 23.5 ± 4.3, respectively. Primary infertility was the most common type of infertility in this study. Ejaculated spermatozoa were used in all cycles. The mean embryos transferred were 2.06 ± 0.91 (from 2 to 3) embryos.
Data obtained by basic sperm analysisfconflict and assisted reproductive outcome assessment are presented in Table 1. It can be seen that the mean BMI in men did not show any significant differences between these groups (P = 0.14). As seen in Tables 1-4, the percentage of fertilization decreased with increasing age in men with different infertility factors. According to the age, this decline was statistically significant in the men of groups Id (P = 0.01), IId (P = 0.01), IIId (P = 0.02), and IVd (P = 0.04) compared to the remaining groups of men. Aging (> 45 years) was negatively correlated with the embryo development rate in men with infertility factor of oligozoospermia (P = 0.01). The significant difference in the embryo development rate was not observed in the other groups (Tables 1 - 4). Thus, the rate of embryo development decreased in group IId (P = 0.01) compared to other groups (IIa-c). In addition, as can be seen in Tables 2 and 4, the poor embryo quality increased in oligozoospermia (grade C; P = 0.001 and grade D; P = 0.005) and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (grade D; P = 0.01) men with advancing age. Therefore, this result shows that aging can affect the developmental potential and quality of embryo in infertile men of oligozoospermia. Male age was not associated with any of the ICSI-ET outcomes (e.g. development rate and quality of embryos) analyzed in infertile men of normozoospermia and asthenozoospermia. While the biochemical pregnancy rate (group Ia: P = 0.014) and clinical pregnancy rate (groups of Ia and IIIa: P = 0.001) increased in younger men of groups of a (Tables 1 and 3). In addition, a significant negative association was observed between clinical pregnancy and male aging in infertile men with factors of oligozoospermia (group IId: P = 0.01) and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (group IVd: P = 0.02). The results show that paternal age can be associated with reproductive outcomes (e.g., fertilization, embryo quality, and biochemical and clinical pregnancy rate) via influencing the number and morphology of sperms (infertility factors of oligozoospermia and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia).
| Normozoospermia (I) (Number of Patients = 74) | P Values | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a (N = 29) | b (N = 22) | c (N = 14) | d (N = 9) | ||
| Oocyte number (fertilization rate %) | 359 (57.2) | 265 (43.1) | 212 (53.1) | 94 (33.7) | 0.01 |
| Embryo number (development rate %) | 159 (77.3) | 123 (77.5) | 93 (76.8) | 40 (75.6) | NS |
| Embryo quality | |||||
| A | 98 (61.6) | 75 (60.9) | 57 (61.2) | 18 (45) | NS |
| B | 33 (20.7) | 24 (19.5) | 11 (11.8) | 9 (22.5) | NS |
| C | 15 (9.4) | 10 (8.1) | 11 (11.8) | 4 (10) | NS |
| D | 13 (8.1) | 14 (11.3) | 14 (15.05) | 9 (22.5) | NS |
| Biochemical pregnancy beta+/TE (%) | 21/29 (72.4) | 7/22 (31.8) | 5/14 (35.7) | 2/9 (22.2) | 0.014 |
| Clinical pregnancyHB+/beta+, % | 19/21 (90.4) | 3/7 (42.8) | 3/5 (60) | 1/2 (50) | 0.001 |
| Oligozoospermia (II) (Number of Patients = 16) | P Values | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a (N = 3) | b (N = 3) | c (N = 3) | d (N = 7) | ||
| Oocyte number (fertilization rate%) | 37 (59.7) | 25 (44) | 24 (54.1) | 55 (32.7) | 0.01 |
| Embryo number (development rate%) | 17 (77.4) | 10 (90.9) | 10 (76.9) | 13 (72.2) | 0.01 |
| Embryo quality | |||||
| A | 8 (47.05) | 5 (50) | 6 (60) | 3 (23.07) | NS |
| B | 4 (23.5) | 3 (30) | 1 (10) | 2 (15.3) | NS |
| C | 2 (11.7) | 1 (10) | 2 (20) | 4 (30.7) | 0.001 |
| D | 3 (17.6) | 1 (10) | 1 (10) | 4 (30.7) | 0.005 |
| Biochemical pregnancybeta+/TE, % | 17/26 (65.38) | 8/24 (33.3) | 12/19 (63.15) | 4/28 (14.2) | 0.01 |
| Clinical pregnancyHB+/beta+, % | 17/17 (100) | 8/8 (100) | 6/12 (50) | 0/4 (0) | 0.01 |
| Asthenozoospermia (III) (Number of Patients = 137) | P Values | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a (N = 8) | b (N = 53) | c (N = 58) | d (N = 18) | ||
| Oocyte number (fertilization rate%) | 114 (57.5) | 902 (53.2) | 670 (51.9) | 212 (33.5) | 0.02 |
| Embryo number (development rate%) | 45 (69.2) | 348 (72.5) | 253 (72.7) | 50 (70.6) | NS |
| Embryo quality | |||||
| A | 15 (33.3) | 42 (12.06) | 41 (16.2) | 9 (18) | NS |
| B | 14 (31.1) | 136 (39.1) | 70 (27.6) | 9 (18) | NS |
| C | 10 (22.2) | 102 (29.3) | 100 (39.5) | 19 (38) | NS |
| D | 6 (13.3) | 68 (19.5) | 42 (16.6) | 13 (26) | NS |
| Biochemical pregnancybeta+/TE, % | 3/8 (37.5) | 7/16 (43.7) | 8/19 (42.1) | 6/13 (46.1) | NS |
| Clinical pregnancyHB+/beta+, % | 2/3 (66.6) | 3/7 (42.8) | 3/8 (37.5) | 2/6 (33.3) | 0.001 |
Outcomes of ICSI-ET in Different Paternal Age Groups of Men with Oligoasthenoteratozoospermiaa, b
| Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (IV) (Number of Patients = 58) | P Values | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a (N = 8) | b (N = 21) | c (N = 21) | d (N = 8) | ||
| Oocyte number (fertilization rate%) | 100 (57) | 283 (49.1) | 252 (51.5) | 83 (33.3) | 0.04 |
| Embryo number (development rate%) | 39 (68.4) | 92 (66.2) | 87 (66.5) | 16 (61.3) | NS |
| Embryo quality | |||||
| A | 11 (28.2) | 15 (16.3) | 12 (13.7) | 1 (6.25) | NS |
| B | 13 (33.3) | 30 (32.6) | 15 (17.2) | 2 (12.5) | NS |
| C | 10 (25.6) | 28 (30.4) | 37 (42.5) | 6 (37.5) | NS |
| D | 5 (12.8) | 19 (20.6) | 23 (26.4) | 7 (43.75) | 0.01 |
| Biochemical pregnancybeta+/TE, % | 3/8 (37.5) | 9/21 (42.8) | 5/21 (23.8) | 2/8 (25) | NS |
| Clinical pregnancyHB+/beta+, % | 1/3 (33.3) | 2/9 (22.2) | 2/5 (40) | 0/2 (0) | 0.02 |
There were statistical differences in the fertilization rate between men with advanced aging and the infertility factor of normozoospermia. There were statistical differences in fertilization rate, development rate, embryo quality, and pregnancy between men with advanced aging and the infertility factor of oligozoospermia. There were statistical differences in the fertilization rate between men with advanced aging and infertility factor of asthenozoospermia. Also, there were statistical differences in fertilization rate, embryo quality, and pregnancy between men with advanced aging and the infertility factor of oligoasthenoteratozoospermia.
5. Discussion
This prospective study evaluated the influence of paternal age on reproductive outcomes in men with infertility factors of oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia, oligoasthenoteratozoospermia, and normozoospermia. Our results show that the male age was significantly associated with lower fertilization, embryo quality, and biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates. These findings were observed in infertile men with factors of oligozoospermia and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia.
Only limited studies have focused on the influence of paternal age on the embryo quality and clinical pregnancy in ICSI cycles, with contradicting findings. Some studies reported that paternal age did not affect embryo quality (10, 11, 16). Aboulghar et al. (17) found no significant difference in the embryo quality due to ICSI between two studied groups (≥ 50 y and < 50 y); however, the fertilization rate significantly increased in the younger group. Ferreira et al. (18) reported no impact of male aging on the embryo quality in infertility factors of oligozoospermia (P = 0.44) or normozoospermia (P = 0.36). In addition, Tsai et al. (19) found no significant differences in the embryo quality across all groups of paternal age. On the other hand, it has been reported that paternal age did have a detrimental effect on the quality and development rate of the embryo (20). Moreover, a negative association between male age and blastocyst formation was shown by Frattarelli et al. (21).
While there are several studies about the effect of male aging on ART outcomes, to the best of our knowledge, there is no report on the effect of paternal age on ART outcomes in infertile couples with male factor infertility. Our research showed a negative relationship between paternal age and embryo quality and clinical pregnancy in couples with infertility malefactors of oligozoospermia and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia.
These findings are consistent with previous reports (22). It has been reported that the quality of semen is affected by the age of men (23). Also, higher sperm chromatin damage is known to be affected by advancing age in men (23, 24) so that the detrimental effects of sperm chromatin integrity have been reported on embryo morphology and reproductive outcomes. In addition, it may also be associated with embryo implantation failure or spontaneous miscarriage (25).
5.1. Conclusions
In conclusion, the effect of advancing age in men was observed on assisted reproductive outcomes in specific factors of infertility (e.g., oligozoospermia and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia). This may construe that the paternal age via affecting sperm parameters (e.g., concentration and morphology) can substantially affect fertility potential in men. Future research needs to include larger populations and longer follow-ups.
References
-
1.
Schmidt L, Sobotka T, Bentzen JG, Nyboe Andersen A, Eshre Reproduction, Society Task F. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(1):29-43. [PubMed ID: 21989171]. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr040.
-
2.
Hendershot GE. Maternal age and overdue conceptions. Am J Public Health. 1984;74(1):35-8. [PubMed ID: 6689839]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1651371]. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.74.1.35.
-
3.
Stone BA, Alex A, Werlin LB, Marrs RP. Age thresholds for changes in semen parameters in men. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(4):952-8. [PubMed ID: 23809502]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.046.
-
4.
Whitcomb BW, Turzanski-Fortner R, Richter KS, Kipersztok S, Stillman RJ, Levy MJ, et al. Contribution of male age to outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):147-51. [PubMed ID: 20663496]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2998574]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.039.
-
5.
Moskovtsev SI, Willis J, Mullen JB. Age-related decline in sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity in patients evaluated for male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):496-9. [PubMed ID: 16595239]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.075.
-
6.
Jenkins TG, Aston KI, Cairns BR, Carrell DT. Paternal aging and associated intraindividual alterations of global sperm 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine levels. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(4):945-51. [PubMed ID: 23809503]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.039.
-
7.
Cocuzza M, Athayde KS, Agarwal A, Sharma R, Pagani R, Lucon AM, et al. Age-related increase of reactive oxygen species in neat semen in healthy fertile men. Urology. 2008;71(3):490-4. [PubMed ID: 18342194]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.041.
-
8.
Plas E, Berger P, Hermann M, Pfluger H. Effects of aging on male fertility? Exp Gerontol. 2000;35(5):543-51. [PubMed ID: 10978677]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0531-5565(00)00120-0.
-
9.
Kuhnert B, Nieschlag E. Reproductive functions of the ageing male. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10(4):327-39. [PubMed ID: 15192059]. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmh030.
-
10.
de La Rochebrochard E, de Mouzon J, Thepot F, Thonneau P, French National IA. Fathers over 40 and increased failure to conceive: the lessons of in vitro fertilization in France. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(5):1420-4. [PubMed ID: 16616749]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.040.
-
11.
Bellver J, Garrido N, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Meseguer M. Influence of paternal age on assisted reproduction outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(5):595-604. [PubMed ID: 18983742]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60305-7.
-
12.
World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
-
13.
Hurley EG, DeFranco EA. Influence of paternal age on perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(5):566 e1-6. [PubMed ID: 28784418]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.034.
-
14.
Scott L, Alvero R, Leondires M, Miller B. The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(11):2394-403. [PubMed ID: 11056141]. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.11.2394.
-
15.
Ebner T, Yaman C, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Polz W, Tews G. Embryo fragmentation in vitro and its impact on treatment and pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(2):281-5. [PubMed ID: 11476773]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01904-5.
-
16.
Wu Y, Kang X, Zheng H, Liu H, Liu J. Effect of Paternal Age on Reproductive Outcomes of In Vitro Fertilization. PLoS One. 2015;10(9). e0135734. [PubMed ID: 26352861]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4564138]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135734.
-
17.
Aboulghar M, Mansour R, Al-Inany H, Abou-Setta AM, Aboulghar M, Mourad L, et al. Paternal age and outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14(5):588-92. [PubMed ID: 17509198]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61050-4.
-
18.
Ferreira RC, Braga DP, Bonetti TC, Pasqualotto FF, Iaconelli AJ, Borges EJ. Negative influence of paternal age on clinical intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle outcomes in oligozoospermic patients. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(6):1870-4. [PubMed ID: 19409557]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.043.
-
19.
Tsai YR, Lan KC, Kung FT, Lin PY, Chiang HJ, Lin YJ, et al. The effect of advanced paternal age on the outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques among patients with azoospermia using cryopreserved testicular spermatozoa. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;52(3):351-5. [PubMed ID: 24075372]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2013.06.001.
-
20.
Luna M, Finkler E, Barritt J, Bar-Chama N, Sandler B, Copperman AB, et al. Paternal age and assisted reproductive technology outcome in ovum recipients. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1772-5. [PubMed ID: 19539905]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.036.
-
21.
Frattarelli JL, Miller KA, Miller BT, Elkind-Hirsch K, Scott RJ. Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(1):97-103. [PubMed ID: 17765235]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.009.
-
22.
Rybar R, Kopecka V, Prinosilova P, Markova P, Rubes J. Male obesity and age in relationship to semen parameters and sperm chromatin integrity. Andrologia. 2011;43(4):286-91. [PubMed ID: 21486403]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2010.01057.x.
-
23.
Wyrobek AJ, Eskenazi B, Young S, Arnheim N, Tiemann-Boege I, Jabs EW, et al. Advancing age has differential effects on DNA damage, chromatin integrity, gene mutations, and aneuploidies in sperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(25):9601-6. [PubMed ID: 16766665]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1480453]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506468103.
-
24.
Ghasemian F, Abolghasem Mirroshandel S, Zahiri Z. Impact of hormonal changes on the semen quality and assisted reproductive outcomes in infertile men. J Appl Biomed. 2017;15(3):227-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jab.2017.04.003.
-
25.
Frydman N, Prisant N, Hesters L, Frydman R, Tachdjian G, Cohen-Bacrie P, et al. Adequate ovarian follicular status does not prevent the decrease in pregnancy rates associated with high sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):92-7. [PubMed ID: 17482180]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.022.