Evaluation of the accuracy of portable ultrasound (eFAST) for detection of pneumothorax

Authors

Ebrahim Karimi1, Saed Safari2, Babak Shekarchi3,*
1Assistant professor, Emergency department, Besat, AJA University of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran, Andorra
2Assistant professor, Emergency department, Shahid Beheshti University of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran, Andorra
3Assistant professor, Radiology department, AJAUniversity of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Corresponding author: Babak Shekarchi, Assistant professor, Radiology department, AJAUniversity of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran, Iran Email: [email protected]

Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research:Vol. 11, issue 3; e65630
Published online:Sep 24, 2013
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jun 02, 2013
Accepted:Aug 24, 2013
How to Cite:Karimi E, Safari S, Shekarchi B. Evaluation of the accuracy of portable ultrasound (eFAST) for detection of pneumothorax. Ann Mil Health Sci Res. 2013;11(3):e65630. doi:

Abstract

Background: Pneumothorax, is a common complication of chest trauma. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of sonographic detection of pneumothorax as a part of extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST).

Materials and Methods: In a prospective study, a sonographic search for pneumothoraxes was performed as part of a standard FAST examination. Each lung field was scanned at the second to fourth anterior intercostal spaces and the sixth to eighth midaxillary line intercostals spaces. A normal pleural interface was identified by the presence of parietal-over-visceral pleural sliding with “comet tail” artifacts behind. Absence of these normal features indicated a pneumothorax. The sonographic diagnosis was correlated with supine chest radiography and chest computed tomography (CT). The data was analyzed by Chi Square test.

Results: A total of 280 lung fields in 140 patients were included in the study. Patients underwent eFAST, chest radiography, and chest CT when clinically indicated. Chest CT was considered the reference standard examination. Computed tomography identified 72 pneumothoraxes (51.4%). On chest radiography, 56 pneumothoraxes (40%) were identified. Extended FAST identified 64 pneumothoraxes (46.4%). Compared with CT, eFAST had sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 95.5%, a positive predictive value of 95.5%, a negative predictive value of 85.5%and accuracy 90%. Five small pneumothoraxes missed by eFAST did not require drainage during the hospitalization period. Average time to do eFAST in trauma room was 1.5 to 5 minutes.

Conclusions: Extended FAST performed by emergency specialist is an accurate and efficient tool for early detection of clinically important pneumothoraxes. In this study ultrasound was more sensitive than supine chest radiography and as sensitive as CT in the detection of traumatic pneumothoraxes.

Fulltext

Full text is available in pdf

References

  • 1.
    References are available in pdf.

Copyright

© 2013, Annals of Military and Health Sciences Research. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

12
Apr
2017

Comparison of Bedside Sonography with Ct Scan in Diagnosis of Pneumothorax

Manizhe Ataei

Ataei M. Comparison of Bedside Sonography with Ct Scan in Diagnosis of Pneumothorax. I J Radiol. 2017;14(Special Issue):e47996. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.47996

13
Mar
2022

Diagnostic Accuracy of Suprasternal Versus Subxiphoid Ultrasonography for Endotracheal Intubation

Seyed Mohammad Mousavi,
Maryam Sayyari Doughabadi,
Seyed Ali Alamdaran,
Sayyed Majid Sadrzadeh,
Hosein Zakeri,
Elnaz VafadarMoradi

Mousavi SM, Sayyari Doughabadi M, Alamdaran SA, Sadrzadeh SM, Zakeri H, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Suprasternal Versus Subxiphoid Ultrasonography for Endotracheal Intubation. Anesth Pain Med. 2022;12(1):e118592. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.118592

20
Jul
2014

Diagnostic Accuracy of Secondary Ultrasound Exam in Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Alireza Rajabzadeh Kanafi,
Masoumeh Giti,
Mohammad Hossein Gharavi,
Ahmad Alizadeh,
Ramin Pourghorban,
Babak Shekarchi

Rajabzadeh Kanafi A, Giti M, Gharavi MH, Alizadeh A, Pourghorban R, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Secondary Ultrasound Exam in Blunt Abdominal Trauma. I J Radiol. 2014;11(3):e21010. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.21010

12
Nov
2017

Diagnostic Value of Sonography for Confirmation of Endotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department

Farzad Rahmani,
Zahra Parsian,
Kavous Shahsavarinia,
Mahboob Pouraghaei,
Sohrab Negargar,
Robab Mehdizadeh Esfanjani
,et al.

Rahmani F, Parsian Z, Shahsavarinia K, Pouraghaei M, Negargar S, et al. Diagnostic Value of Sonography for Confirmation of Endotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department. Anesth Pain Med. 2017;7(6):e58350. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.58350

9
Nov
2023

Diagnosis of Rib Fracture and Related Complications in Patients with Blunt Chest Wall Trauma Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography Scan

Najmeh Zarei Jelyani,
Razieh Sadat Mousavi-Roknabadi,
Roshanak Mohammadi,
Seyed Rouhollah Hosseini-Marvast,
Fazel Goudarzi,
Afsaneh Dehbozorgi

Zarei Jelyani N, Mousavi-Roknabadi RS, Mohammadi R, Hosseini-Marvast SR, Goudarzi F, et al. Diagnosis of Rib Fracture and Related Complications in Patients with Blunt Chest Wall Trauma Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography Scan. Shiraz E-Med J. 2023;24(11):e138379. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-138379

More by these authors

Ebrahim KarimiPubMedScholar
Saed SafariPubMedScholar
Babak ShekarchiPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics