This study showed that changes in the position from supine to sitting in elective neurosurgical operations will not impose cerebral hypoxia even though there is a reduction of MAP after reaching the seated position.
Seated position provides a good field of surgery for posterior fossa craniotomies, yet there are some life threatening complications related to this position like tension pneumocephalus, venous air embolism (VAE), and paradoxical arterial embolus that has resulted in diminished use of this position, although VAE during neurosurgery is not attributed exclusively to the seated position and has frequently been reported in the prone and supine positions. For instance, VAE has been reported in 10% to 17% of craniotomies performed in the prone position (
17).
The rSO2 values from right and left side was the same as base line until the end of surgery. A decrease of MAP from the time that patients entered the anesthesia induction room (baseline time) until the pre-sitting time was observed in this study, as it could contribute to the anesthetic drugs effect and absence of any surgical stimulation. A second decrease in MAP, 15 minutes after sitting positioning, was detected, yet there was not any rSO2 reduction from baseline measurement during the pre-sitting time. This could be contributed to increased FiO2 after mask ventilation and tracheal intubation. However, the trend of MAP values was the same as rSO2 values during the first 15 minutes following reaching the seated position. After 15 minutes of sitting, there was not any alteration in MAP and rSO2 compared with the pre-sitting time as a reference time after anesthesia induction. During the five minutes following sitting positioning despite gravity effect on blood pressure and anticipated hypotension, the researchers did not observe any decrease in MAP. As Mayfield® head holder is placed only after sitting positioning establishment, it could be assumed that increased central sympathetic output due to painful stimulation may increase MAP and consequently cerebral perfusion pressure, which over comes the gravity effect of the seated position. The rSO2 decrease on the 15th minute was statistically significant; however, this reduction from 68.24 ± to 67.30 ± 9.2, is not clinically important and will not imply any risk to patients.
No other risk from older age, increased BMI or higher ASA class on rSO2 values was found in this study, yet lower hemoglobin levels and female gender were correlated with lower baseline rSO2 values. The lower baseline rSO2 in patients with lower hemoglobin levels may be related to less O2 delivery to cerebral tissue. However, the reason for lower baseline rSO2 in female patients in this study was not clear and conducting further studies in the future is suggested.
Reduction of MAP and rSO2 in patients with diabetes on the 15th and the 30th minute after sitting positioning was more profound compared with non-diabetics, which could be contributed to autonomic dysregulation in this group of patients. In patients, who had a history of beta-blocker medications, there was a greater reduction of MAP at the pre-sitting time compared with baseline, which could be due to inhibition of sympathetic nervous system by these medications.
In this study, the incidence of VAE was 43.2%. The reported incidences of VAE in seated position surgeries vary depending on the type of surgery and the method of detection of VAE. In a systematic review of craniotomy studies, the incidence of VAE in seated position was 15% - 45% (
18). This almost high incidence of VAE observed in the present study could be related to the VAE detection technique, which was done by precordial Doppler that has a high sensitivity compared to other techniques, like ETCO2, SpO2, and ECG. As most studies reporting the incidence of VAE have been conducted retrospectively, the possibility of data missing in the recorded documents of patients should be considered as well. In the present study, the researchers observed that 39% (16/41) of patients, who were suspected to have VAE by precordial Doppler also had an ETCO2 decrease (≥ 5 mmHg) and 17% (7/41) of them had visible air bubbles in aspirated blood from the central venous catheter.
One of the most feared complications after seated positioning is cerebral O
2 desaturation. In the search of famous data bases, such as PubMed and ISI, the researchers could find only a few studies about cerebral O
2 saturation changes after seated positioning in neurosurgical patients. Most published studies have investigated cerebral oxygenation on patients undergoing shoulder surgery in beach chair position, a kind of seated position, in which patient’s legs are not elevated enough and back bending is about 45 degrees. Pohl and Cullen reported a series of 4 otherwise healthy patients that after shoulder surgery in beach chair position demonstrated major brain injuries (
11). Following these findings, the need for cerebral perfusion monitoring in the beach chair position has been cleared. Several authors recommend the use of cerebral oximetry to monitor cerebral perfusion (
19). In beach chair position, different incidences of CDE have been reported. Murphy et al. (
16) found episodes of CDE in 80% of patients operated in the beach chair position while Salazar et al. reported 18% of CDE in their prospective study (
20).
In this study, the incidence of CDE was 7.3% and was less than the incidence that could be found in the literature from other published studies. The researchers assume that raising legs in modified sitting position to the level of Tragus leads to a better venous return and improves cardiac output. On the other hand, using total intra venous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and opioids for maintenance of anesthesia instead of using volatiles could prevent from profound positional hypotension. Lindoors et al. observed hypotension after seated positioning, and 69% of patients in their review were administered vasoactive agents during anesthesia (
21) whereas 43.9% of the patients in the current study received vasopressor; administering 7 mL/kg isotonic crystalloid fluid to patients before changing position to the sitting position and using intermittent pneumatic compressing stockings for all patients in this study may play a role in the occurrence of less profound hypotension.
In comparison with the pre-sitting time on the 15th, 30th and 60th minute after sitting positioning, an increase in ETCO2 was observed. In seated position, ventilation of lungs improves and dead space is less and as a result ventilation/perfusion ratio increases. This increase in ETCO2 could be contributed to this phenomenon. Although a relatively high incidence of VAE was detected by Doppler ultrasound, there was only 2 patients (2.1%), who had AUC > 50 min%. The first case was a 19-year-old male, candidate for pineal tumor resection without any history of cardiovascular disease or any medical therapy, who had sudden rSO2 drop of more than 30% following sitting positioning and AUC = 220 min%. Cerebral desaturation started just after sitting positioning without considerable MAP changes and with unchanged central venous pressure. The anesthesia team had to increase FiO2 but rSO2 did not improve and finally the patient was repositioned to supine position and the initiation of surgery was postponed until rSO2 reached back to the safe level. The second case was a 48-year-old male, candidate for brainstem meningioma resection without a history of medical illness or any medical therapy, who had an rSO2 drop more than 30% and AUC = 55 min%, yet at separate times during anesthesia, which was accompanied by hypotension that responded to fluid loading and vasopressor therapy and in this case supine repositioning was not needed. In both cases, the researchers followed the post-operative course and there was not any new sequel in cognitive function or increased ICU admission or hospital stay according to patient documents.
In the present study, for ethical reasons, the responsible anesthesiologist was not blinded to the Cerebral Desaturation Events (CDE) and had to manage the situation, so the results may show lower incidence and severity of CDEs. Inclusion of only non-emergent cases for neurosurgical operations and lack of trans esophageal echocardiography were other limitations of this study.
To our knowledge, this prospective study with 95 cases was one of the largest studies in this field. According to the current findings, it could be suggested that the seated position could be considered as a safe position and applying modern monitoring instruments like cerebral oximetry or brain tissue oximetry, cardiac output monitoring, and TEE will further increase patients’ safety.
For future studies, the researchers recommend addition of cardiac output monitoring and measurement of changes in cardiac output and vascular resistance differences during position changes.
4.1. Conclusions
This study shows that changing the position from supine to sitting in elective neurosurgical operations will not impose cerebral hypoxia even though there is greater reduction of MAP after reaching the seated position.