This cross-sectional study was conducted at Imam Hospital between March 2016 and March 2018. The inclusion criterion was age between 18 and 75 years. All participants were asked to sign informed consent forms before enrollment.
The gathered data included age, sex, the time since stroke, medical history (diabetes, hypertension, and thyroid disorders), and drug history. Moreover, we recorded deep tendon reflex of all four limbs and the results of manual muscle testing examination. Electro-diagnostic tests were conducted by a single expert with more than five-year experience. A two-channel EMG device (Nihon-Kohden, Japan) was used and limb’s temperature was kept at > 32°C.
Nerve conduction studies (NCS) of the median, ulnar, sural, tibial, and deep peroneal nerves were carried out by means of surface bar electrodes. The electrodes were placed at a distance of 4 cm of each nerve using supra-maximal electrical stimulation. Compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) of the median, ulnar, radial, tibial, sural, and deep peroneal nerves were recorded when the machine was set at the sensitivity of 2 mv/div, low-frequency filter of 8 Hz, high-frequency filter of 8 kHz, and sweep speed of 5 ms/division. Sensory nerve action potentials (SNAP) of the median, ulnar, radial, tibial, sural, and deep peroneal nerves were recorded by proximal stimulation and distal recording (antidromic method) when the machine was set the at the sensitivity of 10 µv/div, low-frequency filter of 20 Hz, high-frequency filter of 2 kHz, and sweep speed of 1 ms/division. The onset latency of CMAP and the peak latency of SNAP were recorded at the midpoint of the first negative peak.
All cases underwent both right and left muscle evaluations by electromyogram (tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, gastrocnemius, quadriceps, deltoid, biceps, flexor carpi radialis, extensor digitorum, 1st dorsal interosseous). A 26-G Ambu Neuroline Concentric needle was used with a ground electrode.
Data analysis was conducted by SPSS version 23 software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). The data were presented as mean ± SD for continuous variables and frequencies for categorical variables. The chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used for the comparison of categorical variables. The independent samples t-test was used to compare continuous variables. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.