This qualitative study was conducted using the content analysis approach in Iran in 2018. Ten independent home-dwelling patients in the sub-acute and chronic phase of stroke were included in this study. One patient was interviewed at home, while nine patients were interviewed at the rehabilitation centers of Tehran, Iran. The sub-acute and chronic phase of stroke lasts more than one month.
Patients with a history of a sub-acute and chronic phase of stroke (more than one month after it) were eligible if having the ability to express oneself and willing to participate. Patients with cognitive status survey score of < 21 and the functional independence measure (FIM) score of < 22 were excluded. Patients with hemiparesis or hemiplegia, who could walk to the bathroom with a cane or walker and live at home independently, were also eligible.
In this study, the individual patient was the unit of analysis. The setting for interviewing the patients was their homes. However, most (except one) participants were reluctant to conduct interviews at home. Therefore, by referring to reputable rehab centers in the city of Tehran, the patients diagnosed with stroke were identified according to the inclusion criteria. Patients referred to the rehabilitation centers who met all inclusion criteria were selected. The researcher arranged to interview eligible patients at their convenience.
For data collection, semi-structured interviews were conducted. The researcher communicated with the participants and obtained their oral consent to participate in the study. After obtaining consent, the researcher proceeded with the interviews. The questions in the interview guide were as follows: “What is your experience of day-to-day living with the disease at home?” and “What do you do in terms of self-care when you are at home?” Also, the researchers asked exploratory questions during the interviews for deeper analysis (e.g., “Can you explain more?”). The duration of each interview varied from 20 to 30 minutes on average; if necessary, prolonged interviews were conducted in two stages.
Overall, 10 interviews were conducted in this study. The interviews were recorded in a quiet place and sampling continued until data saturation (
13). Simultaneously, Graneheim and Lundman’s five-step approach was applied to analyze the data. The interviews were immediately transcribed and entered in MAXQDA. All interviews were read to reach a thorough understanding of their content and to define the semantic units and primary codes. Next, similar primary codes were classified in larger groups and content analysis was performed (
14).
In order to confirm the accuracy and reliability of data, the validity and reliability criteria proposed by Lincoln and Guba were followed. The researcher established a long-term relationship with the participants to gain their trust. After extracting the primary codes, their accuracy was confirmed by asking the participants’ opinions; in the event of any conflict or inconsistency, the codes were revised. Also, the control method was implemented by two faculty members and experts in the field of qualitative research, and agreements were obtained on the selected codes and classifications.
We tried to consider the diversity of the sample in terms of age, gender, education, and marital status. Regarding ethical considerations, all participants were informed about the purpose and method of the study. After reaching an agreement, informed consent forms were obtained for participation in the study. The participants were assured of the anonymity and confidentiality of their information and audio files. They were also allowed to withdraw from the study at any time during the study.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (code: IR.USWR.REC.1396.208).