1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Patients and Sampling
3.2. Characterization of Enterobacteriaceae in Stool Samples
3.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test and ESBL Phenotype
| Gene | Primers (5′-3′) | Product Length (bp) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| blaCTX-M | 909 | (19) | |
| F | GAGTTTCCCCATTCCGTTTC | ||
| R | CAGAATAAGGAATCCCATGGTT | ||
| blaTEM | 860 | (20) | |
| F | TCAACATTTCCGTGTCG | ||
| R | CTGACAGTTACCAATGCTTA | ||
| blaSHV | 930 | (21) | |
| F | TTTATCGGCCYTCACTCAAGG | ||
| R | GCTGCGGGCCGGATAACG | ||
| blaPER | 925 | (22) | |
| F | ATGAATGTCATTATAAAAG | ||
| R | AATTTGGGCTTAGGGCAGAA | ||
| blaVEB | 645 | (23) | |
| F | TTGGACTCTGCAACAAATACGC | ||
| R | CGACTTCCATTTCCCGATGC | ||
| ERIC-PCR | Variable | (24) | |
| F | ATGTAAGCTCCTGGGGATTCAC | ||
| R | AAGTAAGTGACTGGGGTGAGCG |
Abbreviation: ERIC-PCR, enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus–polymerase chain reaction.
3.4. Phylogenetic Analysis and Molecular Typing
3.5. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
| Antibiotic Resistance Among the Fecal Enterobacteriaceae | Admission % (n) | Discharge % (n) | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem | 19.2 (10/52) | 21.1 (11/52) | 0.999 |
| Escherichia spp. | 13.9 (6/43) | 11.6 (5/43) | 0.999 |
| Enterobacter spp. | 42.8 (3/7) | 71.4 (5/7) | 0.999 |
| Klebsiella spp. | 50 (1/2) | 50 (1/2) | 0.999 |
| Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole | 69.2 (36/52) | 65.3 (34/52) | 0.66 |
| Escherichia spp. | 72 (31/43) | 67 (29/43) | 0.62 |
| Enterobacter spp. | 57.1 (4/7) | 57.1 (4/7) | 0.999 |
| Klebsiella spp. | 50 (1/2) | 50 (1/2) | 0.999 |
| Cefotaxime-clavulanic acid | 25 (13/52) | 32.6 (17/52) | 0.51 |
| Escherichia spp. | 18.6 (8/43) | 27.9 (12/43) | 0.44 |
| Enterobacter spp. | 57.1 (4/7) | 57.1 (4/7) | 0.999 |
| Klebsiella spp. | 50 (1/2) | 50 (1/2) | 0.999 |
| Cephazolin | 80.7 (42/52) | 86.5 (45/52) | 0.38 |
| Escherichia spp. | 76.7 (33/43) | 83.7 (36/43) | 0.38 |
| Enterobacter spp. | 100 (7/7) | 100 (7/7) | 0.999 |
| Klebsiella spp. | 100 (2/2) | 100 (2/2) | 0.999 |
| Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid | 82.6 (43/52) | 80.7 (42/52) | 0.999 |
| Escherichia spp. | 79 (34/43) | 76.7 (33/43) | 0.999 |
| Enterobacter spp. | 100 (7/7) | 100 (7/7) | 0.999 |
| Klebsiella spp. | 100 (2/2) | 100 (2/2) | 0.999 |
| Cefotaxime | 71.1 (37/52) | 76.9 (40/52) | 0.49 |
| Escherichia spp. | 67.4 (29 /43) | 74.4 (32/43) | 0.47 |
| Enterobacter spp. | 85.7 (6/7) | 85.7 (6/7) | 0.999 |
| Klebsiella spp. | 100 (2/2) | 100 (2/2) | 0.999 |
| Cefepime | 44.2 (23/52) | 48 (25/52) | 0.28 |
| Escherichia spp. | 44.1 (19/43) | 46.5 (20/43) | 0.47 |
| Enterobacter spp. | 42.8 (3/7) | 57.1 (4/7) | 0.999 |
| Klebsiella spp. | 50 (1/2) | 50 (1/2) | 0.999 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 32.6 (17/52) | 38.4 (20/52) | 0.67 |
| Escherichia spp. | 32.5 (14/43) | 39.5 (17/43) | 0.64 |
| Enterobacter spp. | 28.5 (2/7) | 28.5 (2/7) | 0.999 |
| Klebsiella spp. | 50 (1/2) | 50 (1/2) | 0.999 |
| Meropenem | 15.3 (8/52) | 19.2 (10/52) | 0.79 |
| Escherichia spp. | 11.6 (5/43) | 13.9 (6/43) | 0.999 |
| Enterobacter spp. | 28.5 (2/7) | 42.8 (3/7) | 0.999 |
| Klebsiella spp. | 50 (1/2) | 50 (1/2) | 0.999 |
| Ceftriaxone | 71.1 (37/52) | 73 (38/52) | 0.82 |
| Escherichia spp. | 67.4 (29/43) | 72 (31/43) | 0.63 |
| Enterobacter spp. | 85.7 (6/7) | 71.4 (5/7) | 0.999 |
| Klebsiella spp. | 100 (2/2) | 100 (2/2) | 0.999 |
| Gentamicin | 26.9 (14/52) | 23 (12/52) | 0.82 |
| Escherichia spp. | 20.9 (9/43) | 18.6 (8/43) | 0.999 |
| Enterobacter spp. | 57.1 (4/7) | 42.8 (3/7) | 0.999 |
| Klebsiella spp. | 50 (1/2) | 50 (1/2) | 0.999 |
| Ampicillin | 82.6 (43/52) | 88.4 (46/52) | 0.57 |
| Escherichia spp. | 79 (34/43) | 86 (37/43) | 0.57 |
| Enterobacter spp. | 100 (7/7) | 100 (7/7) | 0.999 |
| Klebsiella spp. | 100 (2/2) | 100 (2/2) | 0.999 |
a Antibiotic susceptibility to imipenem (10 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25 - 23.75 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), cefazolin (30 µg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (10 - 20 µg), cefepime (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), meropenem (10 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), and ampicillin (10 µg) was done by the disk diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard M100 protocol (17).
| Admission % (n) | Discharge % (n) | P Value b | AB Usage c | P Value d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDR | |||||
| Enterobacteriaceae | 82.6 (43/52) | 86.5 (45/52) | 0.78 | ||
| Escherichia spp. | 79 (34/43) | 84 (36/43) | 0.78 | ||
| Enterobacter spp. | 100 (7/7) | 100 (7/7) | 0.999 | ||
| Klebsiella spp. | 100 (2/2) | 100 (2/2) | 0.999 | ||
| XDR | |||||
| Enterobacteriaceae | 80 (42/52) | 75 (39/52) | 0.63 | ||
| Escherichia spp. | 83.7 (36/43) | 76.7 (33/43) | 0.58 | ||
| Enterobacter spp. | 57.1 (4/7) | 57.1 (4/7) | 0.999 | ||
| Klebsiella spp. | 100 (2/2) | 100 (2/2) | 0.999 | ||
| PDR | |||||
| Enterobacteriaceae | 1.9 (1/52) | 9.6 (5/52) | 0.20 | ||
| Escherichia spp. | 2 (1/43) | 7 (3/43) | 0.61 | ||
| Enterobacter spp. | 0 (0/7) | 28 (2/7) | 0.46 | ||
| Klebsiella spp. | 0 (0/2) | 0 (0/2) | 0.999 | ||
| ESBL | |||||
| Enterobacteriaceae | 48 (25/52) | 42.3 (22/52) | 0.69 | ||
| Escherichia spp. | 51 (22/43) | 46 (20/43) | 0.83 | Metronidazole e | 0.016 |
| Enterobacter spp. | 28 (2/7) | 14 (1/7) | 0.999 | ||
| Klebsiella spp. | 50 (1/2) | 50 (1/2) | 0.999 |
Abbreviations: MDR, multidrug-resistant; XDR, extensively drug-resistant; PDR, pan-drug-resistant; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase.
a Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for 52 patients who had positive cultures for Enterobacteriaceae upon admission and discharge (Escherichia spp. (43), Enterobacter spp. (7), and Klebsiella spp. (2)).
b The P value shows the difference in the frequency of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, pan-drug-resistant, and extended-spectrum β-lactamase phenotypes in the Enterobacteriaceae isolates from rectal swabs of children upon admission and discharge.
c The AB usage refers to the antibiotics prescribed during the pediatric intensive care unit stay for the studied patients, including cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, vancomycin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, metronidazole, cefazolin, cotrimoxazole, amikacin, tazocin, linezolid, ampicillin, ceftazidime, and other-antibiotics.
d The P value refers to a difference in the fecal colonization of Enterobacteriaceae isolates with multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, pan drug-resistant, extended-spectrum β-lactamase phenotypes among the pediatric intensive care unit-admitted children based on the prescribed antibiotics during the hospital stay.
e A significant relationship was detected between the extended-spectrum β-lactamase phenotype and the prescription of metronidazole during the hospitalization period.
Homology in the phenetic and molecular patterns of Escherichia species isolates from the stool of pediatric patients in the pediatric intensive care unit upon admission and discharge. The scale bar shows the percentage of homology. Phylogenetic relationship of Escherichia spp. strains isolated from the primary and secondary stool samples of children hospitalized in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) based on antimicrobial sensitivity and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR) patterns. Dendrogram was drawn using numerical data using NTSyS software version 2.02. Strains with 100% similarity were considered identical, while others with more than 90% similarity were defined as related strains. a, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) patterns show the similarity of antibiotic susceptibility phenotypes among isolates. The numerical codes represent patterns of resistance (1), susceptible (2), and intermediate (3) to different antibiotics orderly as follows: Imipenem, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cefotaxime-clavulanic acid, cefazolin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefotaxime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, ceftriaxone, gentamicin, and ampicillin.
