Streptococcus pneumoniae is one of the major causes of childhood mortality around the world (
13,
14). Pneumococcal pneumonia can be a primary cause of mortality in young children, responsible for an estimated 294,000 deaths globally in children under the age of five. Colonization of the nasopharynx is recognized as a crucial step in the development of pneumococcal diseases (
13-
15).
In our study, the rate of
S. pneumoniae colonization was higher in patients than in healthy children. The results of two studies in Sri Lanka and Thailand in 2020 (
16) were similar to ours, showing that the rate of
S. pneumoniae colonization in patients was higher than in healthy children. On the other hand, in another study in Thailand in 2020,
S. pneumoniae colonization in the control group was reported to be higher than in the patients (
17).
This difference in colonization may be due to various reasons, such as the time and season, the sampling method, differences in the socio-demographic backgrounds of the participants, geographical differences, and different age populations in the study groups. Some studies use the CT value obtained from RT-PCR for microorganism identification to differentiate between infection and colonization (
18-
20). Comparing the mean CT values between the patients and healthy children provides information on potential variations in
S. pneumoniae colonization levels.
Nevertheless, our study did not reveal any significant differences in the mean CT values between the patients and controls (P > 0.05). Contrary to our results, numerous prior studies involving children have assessed pneumococcal colonization density as an indicator and molecular marker of pneumococcal pneumonia (
10,
13,
17,
21,
22). However, some of these studies (
17,
21,
22) precisely determine the bacterial load using quantitative RT-PCR, which can be very helpful but is expensive and requires a professional expert.
In an Ethiopian study, the average CT values were compared between patients infected by
S. pneumoniae and control groups, acting as an indirect indicator of bacterial load. The results showed no statistically significant differences in the mean CT values between the two groups (P = 0.5) (
20). Also, in the study by Vidanapathirana et al., no significant difference was observed in the amount of colonization of
S. pneumoniae between sick and healthy children, even though this amount was higher in sick children (
16).
The results of these studies (
16,
20) are precisely aligned with ours, as they have been unable to find an appropriate cutoff to distinguish between colonized and infected children with
S. pneumoniae.
The results of the study by Rouhi et al. showed that positive cases were categorized as follows: The CT ≤ 32 as infection, CT > 35 as colonization, and a grey zone was established for values between 32 and 35 (32 < X ≤ 35) in the detection of
Pneumocystis jirovecii (
18). This difference between our results and this study (
18) can be attributed to the evaluation of different microorganisms in both studies. Perhaps the different load of
P. jirovecii has a significant difference between colonized and infectious individuals. However, we did not observe these results in the load of
S. pneumoniae in children.
Gronseth et al. worked on distinguishing
Pneumocystis pneumonia from colonization in a heterogeneous population of HIV-negative immunocompromised patients. They reported that the median CT value was lower among patients with
Pneumocystis pneumonia than among individuals without
Pneumocystis pneumonia (P < 0.001), confirming higher fungal loads in those with clinical infection. Nevertheless, it was impossible to find an optimal CT cutoff value for distinguishing between patients and those with colonization because of the existing overlaps (
19). In that study (
19), a different microorganism was evaluated, similar to the study by Rouhi et al. (
18), and they could determine the approximate cut-off, but their conclusion is similar to ours. They agree that the overlap of this data prevents the establishment of an accurate cutoff for CT value to distinguish between colonized individuals and those who are ill (
19).
Considering the similar bacterial load observed in pediatric patients and carriers of S. pneumoniae, it may be feasible to establish a precise CT value distinguishing between patients and carriers. This can be achieved by quantifying the bacterial count through quantitative RT-PCR or by assessing the bacterial copy numbers based on the quantity of DNA extracted using instruments like Nanodrop.
5.1. Conclusions
The findings of this study indicated that the bacterial load in colonized children with S. pneumoniae was high and comparable to that observed in patients suffering from pneumonia caused by the same bacterium. The CT value in RT-PCR is indirectly associated with the bacterial load. However, an accurate cut-off for the detection of S. pneumoniae in patients and carriers was not identified in our study.