Reviewing research conducted over the past two decades reveals that certain microorganisms and common risk factors can contribute to the development of atherosclerotic plaques. One such bacterium is
P. gingivalis, an anaerobic Gram-negative bacterium known for its role in initiating inflammation and tissue destruction in periodontal disease (
13,
18).
Periodontitis, characterized by oral microbiota dysbiosis, is a multifactorial inflammatory disease that destroys periodontal tissues and bone (
19). Numerous studies have established a significant association between chronic periodontitis and other conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (
20,
21).
The inflammatory atherosclerosis hypothesis posits that atherosclerosis is an inflammatory response triggered by agents that cause damage to the endothelial cells of blood vessel walls (
7). In addition to directly infecting cardiac tissue, certain infectious agents can induce and sustain inflammation, indirectly contributing to cardiovascular disease (
1,
22). Other risk factors for atherosclerosis include hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, obesity, smoking, and physical inactivity (
4).
The association between oral health and atherosclerosis was initially suggested by Mattila et al., who found a strong correlation between poor dental hygiene and acute myocardial infarction (
23). Mendez et al. identified periodontitis as an independent risk factor for peripheral vascular disease. The presence of periodontopathic bacteria, including
P. gingivalis and Streptococcus sanguis, in atherosclerotic lesions was first reported in a study investigating the impact of various infections on the development of carotid artery plaques (
24).
The oral cavity serves as a significant reservoir of diverse microorganisms that can enter the bloodstream of individuals with periodontitis through activities like chewing and tooth brushing, which occur multiple times a day (
25,
26).
Research indicates that the prevalence of
P. gingivalis in healthy adults ranges from 16.8% to 25%, highlighting its presence even in individuals without apparent periodontal issues. For instance, a study published in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology reported a detection rate of 25% in healthy subjects, contrasting with a higher prevalence of 79% in individuals with periodontitis. This disparity underscores the potential subclinical presence of
P. gingivalis in healthy populations, suggesting a complex relationship between this bacterium and oral health (
27).
In the present study,
P. gingivalis was detected in 45% of subgingival plaque samples and 16% of atherosclerotic plaque samples. A pairwise comparison of atherosclerotic and subgingival samples within each patient revealed a statistically significant difference in the results. Six of the 21 atherosclerotic samples negative for
P. gingivalis had positive subgingival samples. Furthermore, all four positive atherosclerotic plaque samples also tested positive in examining subgingival plaques. The correlation between the atherosclerotic and subgingival groups was modest (correlation coefficient r = 0.5), and the agreement between the atherosclerotic and subgingival groups, as assessed by the Kappa test, was 44%. Atarbashi-Moghadam et al. reported the presence of
P. gingivalis in 43.47% of subgingival and 13.04% of atherosclerotic plaque samples, which was statistically significant. This study is the same as the current study regarding sample size, the microbiological investigation method, the statistical test, and the results. It confirms the relationship between
P. gingivalis in subgingival and atherosclerotic plaques (
1).
In the study by Altayeb et al., the load of periodontal bacteria in atherosclerotic plaque samples was much higher in patients with periodontitis compared to the healthy group, and pathogens play a role in periodontitis, especially
P. gingivalis and
Tannerella forsythia, were also found in atherosclerotic plaques. This study showed that the presence of these bacteria in atherosclerotic plaques is attributed to the severity of periodontitis and bacterial load of subgingival plaques. The presence of periodontal pathogens in atherosclerotic plaques showed a relationship between periodontitis and cardiovascular diseases, which is consistent with the results of the present study (
3).
Gaetti-Jardim et al. conducted a study that aligns with the present research, as they found no significant association between the presence of periopathogenic bacteria in atherosclerotic plaques and factors such as age, sex, number of teeth, or smoking.
P. gingivalis was the most frequently detected bacterium (53.8%) in atherosclerotic plaque samples from patients with periodontitis. The authors of that study suggested that the presence of periopathogenic bacteria in atherosclerotic plaques of individuals with periodontitis indicates a non-random occurrence and implies their potential involvement in cardiovascular diseases, consistent with the current study's findings (
4).
In another study by Marcelino et al., they reported the presence of
P. gingivalis in 75% of subgingival plaque samples and 50% of atherosclerotic plaque samples, corroborating the present study and confirming the relationship between
P. gingivalis in subgingival and atherosclerotic plaques (
28).
Szulc et al. also found the presence of
P. gingivalis in 74% of subgingival plaque samples and 23% of atherosclerotic plaque samples. Their findings demonstrated the frequent occurrence of
P. gingivalis in atherosclerotic plaques of patients with periodontitis, which is consistent with the current study (
7).
On the other hand, Cairo et al. reported the presence of
P. gingivalis in 53% of subgingival plaque samples (
15). However, they did not detect it in any of the atherosclerotic plaque samples. They did not observe a relationship between the presence of periodontal bacteria in subgingival plaques and the development of atherosclerotic plaques, which contradicts the results of the present study. This discrepancy could be attributed to the smaller sample size in their study, which may have hindered the detection of a relationship between the presence of
P. gingivalis in subgingival plaques and atherosclerotic plaques. Furthermore, the methods employed in the two studies differ, as Cairo et al. collected samples from the carotid arteries of living individuals. In contrast, our study collected samples from the coronary arteries of deceased individuals (
15). Aimetti et al. reported the presence of
P. gingivalis in 63% of subgingival plaque samples and did not report the presence of this bacterium in any of the atherosclerotic plaque samples. They found no relationship between
P. gingivalis in subgingival and atherosclerotic plaques. They took their sample from carotid artery plaques. The discrepancy between the results can be attributed to the different immune responses of the host, the different study populations, and the different sample collection techniques (
11).
Additional analyses conducted in our study revealed that when considering only the high-risk group of individuals with a history of cardiovascular disease and diabetes, there was no statistically significant difference between the atherosclerotic and subgingival plaque samples. However, the small size of our study may have influenced these findings. Given that advanced age, high BMI, and underlying systemic conditions such as diabetes and smoking are significant risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, it is imperative to prioritize these factors and conduct further investigations in future studies.
One limitation of our research was the difficulty in obtaining suitable samples. Rigor mortis posed challenges in opening the mouth, thereby hindering access to posterior teeth during subgingival plaque sampling. Additionally, the small sample size and focus solely on the DNA of P. gingivalis bacteria were areas that could be improved in our study. Future studies can explore the examination of other periopathogenic bacteria in similar contexts. Furthermore, our study only examined the existence of an agreement between samples without investigating cause-and-effect relationships. It is worth considering that by focusing on larger sample sizes and minimizing data dispersion in terms of age, sex, and systemic conditions, a stronger agreement between subgingival and atherosclerotic samples can potentially be achieved, particularly within high-risk groups.
Future studies could use next-generation sequencing to fully characterize all oral and atherosclerotic plaque specimens to better understand the role of periopathogenic bacteria in atherosclerotic plaque development and progression. This approach would provide valuable insights into the intricate mechanisms underlying the involvement of periopathogenic bacteria in atherosclerosis.
5.1. Conclusions
In conclusion, despite the limitations of our study, the results highlight a significant relationship between the presence of P. gingivalis in subgingival and atherosclerotic plaques in coronary arteries. Patients with chronic periodontitis exhibited positive detection of this pathogen in their atherosclerotic plaques, indicating a potential link between periodontal disease and cardiovascular health. These findings underscore the importance of emphasizing effective periodontal therapy as a potential intervention for improving cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with cardiovascular disease. Further research with larger sample sizes and comprehensive analysis of other periopathogenic bacteria is warranted to better understand this association and establish causality.