Fusarium species was the most common agent of fungal keratitis over five years in the present study, similar to the study by Lin et al. in 2017, which found
Fusarium species in 44.4% of cases and the dominant role of Fusarium is evident in studies (
11,
12). In Iran, limited comprehensive studies have been conducted regarding fungal keratitis. In a study by Akbari and Sedighi,
Aspergillus spp. and
Fusarium spp. were reported as the most frequent pathogens responsible for keratitis in patients in central regions of Iran (
6). In similar studies conducted in tropical regions,
Fusarium species have been reported as the most common cause of fungal keratitis (
13,
14). The dominant role of
Fusarium in fungal keratitis is a finding observed in various studies worldwide. For instance, based on research conducted,
Fusarium spp. has been identified as the predominant agent of fungal keratitis in countries such as India, Bangladesh, and some regions of Africa (
15,
16). A study by Ranjini and Waddepally in India showed that over 70 percent of fungal keratitis cases were caused by
Fusarium spp. (
17). A study by Kibret and Bitew in Southeast Asia indicated that environmental factors significantly contribute to the increased prevalence of
Fusarium spp., which aligns with the findings of this study. Additionally,
Aspergillus species, due to their widespread distribution in various environments, can be reported as the most common cause of fungal keratitis, as observed in the study by Binnani et al. (
18,
19).
Factorial epidemiological studies have shown that the diversity of fungal species responsible for fungal keratitis varies according to geographical and climatic conditions. However, it should be remembered that Fata et al. identified other significant risk factors, such as hygiene, social and economic status, occupation, history of corneal injury, frequent contact with plant leaves and branches, and use of contact lenses in women (
20). The study by Karimi et al. highlighted that fungal keratitis in the border regions of Iran and Afghanistan is significantly influenced by exposure to dust and thorny and contaminated plants (
21).
In the present study, based on microscopic examinations and culture results from corneal scrapings, 26.6% of patients were positive for both microscopic and culture tests, 32% were positive for culture alone, and 37% were positive for direct microscopic examination only. In this study, direct (KOH) and fungal culture tests were used as complementary methods. The results showed that combining both diagnostic methods can increase the sensitivity of the diagnosis and help confirm the diagnosis. In the study by Badawi et al., after examining 247 corneal scraping samples, they observed pure fungal culture growth in 50 cases and reported a prevalence of 24.7%. Various studies worldwide have reported different prevalences (37.5% in India, 45.1% in Ethiopia), which may indicate different inclusion criteria for individuals in the study or different disease risk factors (
22,
23).
The present study shows that men (59.57%) were more affected by fungal keratitis than women. This can be explained by the higher-risk occupations of men in outdoor environments and greater exposure to environmental factors. Additionally, the highest prevalence of the disease was found in the age group of 31 to 50 years, likely due to occupational activities related to agriculture and contact with plants. Cases of infection in people aged lower than 10 and higher than 90 were less likely, both of which could be due to the fewer number of individuals in the relevant age groups. A higher proportion of fungal infections were seen in rural patients than in urban patients. This reflects the impact of poor hygiene, limited access to health facilities, and increased exposure to environmental risk factors in rural areas (
24).
5.1. Conclusions
Fungal keratitis was found to affect a specific demographic, as reported by a study conducted over a period of 5 years, which isolated fungal agents in 94 samples of keratitis. The most common causative agent found was Fusarium spp., and rural patients and patients between the ages of 31 and 50 years made up the majority of those affected, attributable in part to greater exposure to environmental factors. Men were also at higher risk than women, perhaps due to higher-risk outdoor work. The application of molecular techniques for species and genotype identification of fungi related to clinical manifestations, the effect of specific environmental factors (dust and humidity), the distribution of fungal species, and propagation of intervention studies to assess the efficacy of preventive and therapeutic techniques in high-risk regions are recommendations for future research. This was one of the limitations of this study.