Arch Clin Infect Dis

Image Credit:Arch Clin Infect Dis

Genetic Diversity of Class 1 and Class 2 Integron Gene Cassettes in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Hospital Wastewater in Tehran, Iran

Author(s):
Mehdi GoudarziMehdi GoudarziMehdi Goudarzi ORCID1,*, Seyedeh Fatemeh HamzaviSeyedeh Fatemeh Hamzavi1, Masoumeh NavidiniaMasoumeh NavidiniaMasoumeh Navidinia ORCID2, Masoud DadashiMasoud DadashiMasoud Dadashi ORCID3, Mohammad Javad NasiriMohammad Javad NasiriMohammad Javad Nasiri ORCID4, Hossein GoudarziHossein GoudarziHossein Goudarzi ORCID1
1Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
4Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases:Vol. 20, issue 6; e165390
Published online:Dec 17, 2025
Article type:Research Article
Received:Aug 13, 2025
Accepted:Dec 05, 2025
How to Cite:Goudarzi M, Hamzavi SF, Navidinia M, Dadashi M, Nasiri MJ, et al. Genetic Diversity of Class 1 and Class 2 Integron Gene Cassettes in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Hospital Wastewater in Tehran, Iran. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2025;20(6):e165390. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid-165390

Abstract

Background and Objectives:

Hospital wastewater is a major reservoir for multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, including integron-bearing Staphylococcus aureus. Integrons facilitate the acquisition and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance genes, making their epidemiological characterization essential for infection control.

Methods:

In this cross-sectional study, conducted over a 15-month period at two teaching hospitals affiliated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, a total of 120 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates were collected from hospital wastewater, of which 75 (62.5%) were integron-positive S. aureus isolates. The isolates underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing, integron class determination, and molecular analysis for resistance gene cassettes. Associations between integron classes and antimicrobial resistance profiles were statistically evaluated.

Results:

Of the isolates examined, 66.6% carried class 1 integrons, 26.7% carried class 2 integrons, and 6.7% harbored both classes. Carriage of class 1 integrons was significantly associated with resistance to amikacin, penicillin, gentamicin, tetracycline, and erythromycin. Class 2 integrons were significantly correlated with resistance to amikacin, tetracycline, and erythromycin. A total of 16 distinct gene cassette arrays were identified. In class 1 integrons, the most prevalent arrays were aadBaacA4aadA2 (20%), aadB–catB3 (14%), and aadBcmlA6 (12%). In class 2 integrons, sat2 (25%), dhfrA1sat2 (20%), and dhfrA1 (20%) were most frequent. Multidrug resistance was observed in 94.2% of isolates, with resistance to erythromycin, tetracycline, gentamicin, and amikacin being most common.

Conclusions:

This study highlights the predominance of class 1 integrons and their diverse gene cassette arrays in S. aureus isolates from hospital wastewater. The significant association between integron carriage and resistance to multiple antibiotics underscores the urgent need for enhanced surveillance and targeted infection control strategies to limit the spread of integron-bearing S. aureus within healthcare environments.

1. Background

Hospital wastewater is a complex and often underappreciated reservoir of pathogenic and drug-resistant microorganisms (1). Among these, Staphylococcus aureus is of particular concern due to its ability to persist in diverse environmental conditions and its well-documented role in both community- and hospital-acquired infections (2). The detection of S. aureus in hospital effluents not only reflects the clinical burden within the institution but also highlights the potential for environmental dissemination of this pathogen. More critically, hospital wastewater may harbor multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains of S. aureus, creating a conduit for the transfer of resistance traits to other environmental or clinical bacteria (3). The release of such wastewater into municipal systems without adequate treatment can facilitate the spread of resistance genes in the broader environment, posing serious challenges to public health. Infections caused by MDR S. aureus strains are associated with limited treatment options, prolonged hospital stays, increased morbidity, and elevated healthcare costs (3-5). This highlights the importance of environmental monitoring and control of such pathogens in healthcare-associated waste streams (1, 2).
One of the major genetic mechanisms facilitating the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance in bacterial populations is the presence of mobile genetic elements, particularly integrons. Integrons are DNA elements capable of capturing and expressing gene cassettes, many of which encode resistance determinants against a wide range of antibiotics. These elements consist of an integrase gene (intI), a recombination site (attI), and a promoter that drives the expression of the integrated cassettes (3, 6). Class 1 integrons are the most prevalent and have been identified in both Gram-negative and, increasingly, Gram-positive bacteria such as S. aureus. Through their modular architecture, integrons allow for the accumulation of multiple gene cassettes within a single element, thereby promoting multidrug resistance. The gene cassettes associated with integrons often include resistance to aminoglycosides, sulfonamides, β-lactams, macrolides, and other antibiotic classes. The environmental presence of such integrons, particularly in hospital wastewater, poses a significant threat, as it represents a dynamic reservoir for horizontal gene transfer and the evolution of MDR phenotypes across microbial communities (7).

2. Objectives

The present study was undertaken to investigate the prevalence of integrons in S. aureus strains isolated from hospital wastewater samples and to characterize the gene cassettes associated with these integrons. Specifically, this research aimed to determine the frequency of integron carriage and to sequence the resistance gene cassettes integrated within these elements.

3. Methods

3.1. Sample Collection

Hospital wastewater samples were systematically collected on a weekly basis over a 15-month period, spanning from June 2022 to August 2023. A total of 570 samples were obtained from two teaching hospitals affiliated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. For each sampling day, three separate samples were collected using sterile 500 mL polyethylene bottles preloaded with sodium thiosulfate to neutralize residual disinfectants. All samples were immediately transported to the laboratory under cooled conditions and stored at 4°C until processing. Approximately 100 mL of each sample was filtered through a 0.45 μm pore-size membrane filter, after which the retained material was inoculated onto blood agar plates (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) for bacterial culture (8). Only isolates that demonstrated visible bacterial growth on blood agar following membrane filtration were included in the study. Colonies with distinct morphological characteristics were subcultured for purification, and non-viable colonies, mixed cultures, or plates with insufficient growth were excluded.

3.2. Isolation and Identification of Staphylococcus aureus

Presumptive S. aureus colonies, characterized by golden-yellow or creamy-white pigmentation, were subjected to preliminary biochemical screening. Catalase activity was confirmed using hydrogen peroxide, and coagulase production was evaluated via the tube method with rabbit plasma (HiMedia, Mumbai, India). Confirmed colonies were further subcultured onto mannitol salt agar and DNase agar (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) for phenotypic verification. For molecular confirmation, genomic DNA was extracted and the presence of the nucA gene (270 bp) was assessed using PCR (8).

3.3. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antibiotic susceptibility profiles were determined using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar plates, following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (CLSI, 2022). The tested antibiotics included amikacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, nitrofurantoin, fusidic acid, mupirocin, rifampin, ciprofloxacin, penicillin, gentamicin, tobramycin, tigecycline, tetracycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and quinupristin/dalfopristin, which are commonly used for S. aureus treatment. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of vancomycin and mupirocin (to detect both low-level and high-level resistance) were assessed using the broth microdilution technique in 96-well microtiter plates, as previously described in standard protocols. The D-zone test was also employed to detect inducible clindamycin resistance. Methicillin resistance was screened using a 30 µg cefoxitin disc, and results were interpreted according to CLSI breakpoints. Quality control for all antimicrobial susceptibility tests was maintained by using standard reference S. aureus strains: ATCC 25923, ATCC 29213, and ATCC 43300.

3.4. Extraction of Genomic and Plasmid DNA from Staphylococcus aureus

Genomic DNA extraction from S. aureus isolates was carried out according to the protocol described by Mostafa et al. (9). PCR amplification products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel and visualized using ethidium bromide staining under ultraviolet light. A 100 bp Plus DNA Ladder (GeneRuler™, Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) was employed as a molecular weight marker to estimate fragment sizes. In parallel, plasmid DNA was isolated from S. aureus strains using the Qiagen Plasmid Midi Kit, following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol (9).

3.5. Detection of Class 1 and Class 2 Integrons

All S. aureus isolates were screened for the presence of class 1 and class 2 integrons using specific primers targeting the intI1 and intI2 genes, as previously described by Moura et al. (10).

3.6. Detection and Sequencing of Integron Gene Cassettes

To investigate the gene cassettes embedded within the variable regions of class 1 and class 2 integrons, PCR amplification was performed using specific primer sets described by Moura et al. (10). PCR products exhibiting distinct band sizes upon agarose gel electrophoresis were selected for further analysis. These amplicons were purified using the High Pure PCR Product Purification Kit (Roche, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and then subjected to direct sequencing.

3.7. Statistical Analysis

Comparisons of antibiotic resistance between integron-positive and integron-negative isolates were performed using the Chi-square (χ²) test. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

4. Results

4.1. Isolation and Antibiotic Susceptibility

A total of 120 S. aureus isolates were collected from hospital wastewater samples in Tehran over a 15-month period. All S. aureus isolates were confirmed as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) according to the detection of the mecA gene. Among these, 75 isolates (62.5%) were integron positive, and the remaining 45 (37.5%) were integron negative. Overall, all isolates were found to be MRSA, while MDR was confirmed in 94.2% of isolates (n = 113). All strains were resistant to penicillin. The highest level of antibiotic resistance was observed against erythromycin (84.2%), followed by tetracycline (82.5%), gentamicin (74.2%), and amikacin (73.3%). It is worth mentioning that 29 tested isolates were resistant to mupirocin (24.2%). The present analysis revealed that 23 isolates (79.3%) had high-level mupirocin resistance (HLMUPR) and 6 isolates (20.7%) had low-level mupirocin resistance (LLMUPR) patterns. Of the 120 S. aureus isolates, resistance to fusidic acid was detected in 9 isolates (7.5%), all of which belonged to MRSA integron-positive strains. According to our results, 56 isolates (46.7%) exhibited constitutive clindamycin resistance [constitutive macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (cMLSB)] phenotypes and 45 isolates (37.5%) displayed inducible clindamycin resistance [inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (iMLSB)] phenotypes (Table 1). The results of the disk diffusion method indicated that twenty-two resistance profiles were observed. The top three resistance profiles were as follows: AMK, CLI, ERY, GEN, PEN, TET, TOB (20.8%; 25/120); AMK, ERY, GEN, PEN, TET (11.7%; 14/120); and AMK, ERY, GEN, NIT, PEN, RIF, SYN, TET and AMK, CLI, ERY, GEN, NIT, PEN, RIF, TET (each 10%; 12/120) of isolates.
Table 1.Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Integron Positive and Integron Negative Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from Hospital Wastewater a
AntibioticsAll Strains of MRSA (n = 120)Integron-Positive MRSA Isolates (n = 75)Integron-Positive MRSA Isolates (n = 75)
RSRSRS
PEN120 (100)0 (0)75 (100)0 (0)45 (100)0 (0)
GEN89 (74.2)31 (25.8)55 (73.3)20 (26.7)34 (75.6)11 (24.4)
AMK88 (73.3)32 (26.7)59 (78.7)16 (21.3)29 (64.4)16 (35.6)
TOB41 (34.2)79 (65.8)38 (50.7)37 (49.3)3 (6.7)42 (93.3)
ERY101 (84.2)19 (15.8)75 (100)0 (0)26 (57.8)19 (42.2)
CLI56 (46.7)64 (53.3)40 (53.3)35 (46.7)16 (35.6)29 (64.4)
TET99 (82.5)21 (17.5)59 (78.7)16 (21.3)40 (88.9)5 (11.1)
TIG2 (1.7)118 (98.3)2 (2.7)73 (97.3)0 (0)45 (100)
RIF49 (40.8)71 (59.2)30 (40)45 (60)19 (42.2)26 (57.8)
NIT43 (35.8)77 (64.2)24 (32)51 (68)19 (42.2)26 (57.8)
SYN14 (11.7)106 (88.3)8 (10.7)67 (89.3)6 (13.3)39 (86.7)
SXT24 (20)96 (80)16 (21.3)59 (78.7)8 (17.8)37 (82.2)
FUS9 (7.5)111 (92.5)9 (12)66 (88)0 (0)45 (100)
MUP29 (24.2)91 (75.8)18 (24)57 (76)11 (24.4)34 (75.6)

Abbreviations: AMK, amikacin; CLI, clindamycin; ERY, erythromycin; FUS; fusidic acid; GEN, gentamicin; MUP, mupirocin; NIT, nitrofurantoin; PEN, penicillin; RIF, Rifampin; SXT, trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole; SYN, quinupristin-dalfopristin; TET, tetracycline; TIG, tigecycline; TOB, tobramycin; MRSA, methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

a Values are presented as No. (%).

4.2. Identification of Class 1 and Class 2 Integrons

The integron detection results showed that among the 120 strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus, 75 (62.5%) isolates carried integrons. Integron type I was highly prevalent, representing 66.6% (50/75), followed by type II (26.7%; 20/75). Simultaneous carriage of integron class 1 and 2 was present in 5 isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (6.7%). The findings demonstrated that resistance to several different antibiotics is linked with the presence of integrons. The relationship between the presence of integron class 1 and resistance to amikacin, penicillin, gentamicin, tetracycline, and erythromycin was significant. Resistance to antibiotics including amikacin, tetracycline, and erythromycin in S. aureus isolates was associated with the presence of integron class 2. Information about the relationship between integron class 1 and 2 is summarized in Table 2. Of 50 integron class 1-positive isolates, 45 (90%) harbored integron class 1 on the chromosome, and 5 (10%) isolates on plasmid. Among 20 integron class 2-positive isolates, 16 (80%) carried class 2 integrons on the chromosome and 5 (20%) isolates on plasmid. All isolates carrying both class 1 and 2 harbored integrons on the chromosome. The distribution of different classes of integrons and resistance profiles in S. aureus strains are presented in Figure 1.
Table 2.Correlation of Antibiotic Resistance Between Class 1 and Class 2 Integron-Positive and Integron-Negative Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains
AntibioticsClass I IntegronClass II IntegronClass I and II Integron
R aP-ValueR aP-ValueR aP-Value
PEN500.006 b200.05550.11
GEN450.002 b50.1450.42
AMK390.003 b180.01 b20.5
TOB220.06160.0800.47
ERY500.004 b200.006 b50.08
CLI250.12150.220.12
TET390.001 b170.045 b30.19
TIG20.1200.200.45
RIF180.11100.320.41
NIT190.05650.2200.6
SYN70.4810.4300.5
SXT150.7410.1100.34
FUS90.1100.4100.36
MUP180.200.200.4

Abbreviations: AMK, amikacin; CLI, clindamycin; ERY, erythromycin; FUS; fusidic acid; GEN, gentamicin; MUP, mupirocin; NIT, nitrofurantoin; PEN, penicillin; RIF, Rifampin; SXT, trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole; SYN, quinupristin-dalfopristin; TET, tetracycline; TIG, tigecycline; TOB, tobramycin.

a Values are presented as No.

b Statistically significant.

Distribution of resistance profiles by integron types
Figure 1.

Distribution of resistance profiles by integron types

4.3. Characterization of Gene Cassettes

Sequence analyses of PCR products of the integron cassette region revealed 12, 4, and 2 different gene cassettes in class 1, class 2, and class 1+2 integrons, respectively. Overall, 16 distinct kinds of gene cassette arrays were identified. Four (20%) of the class 2 integron-containing isolates did not have any PCR products. In class 1 integrons, the gene cassette arrays aadB-aacA4-aadA2 (20%), aadB-catB3 (14%), and aadB-cmlA6 (12%) were found to be the top three gene cassette arrays, while in class 2 integrons, the gene cassette arrays sat2 (25%), dhfrA1-sat2 (20%), and dhfrA1 (20%) were found to be the most prevalent (Figure 2). Different sizes of gene cassettes of integron class 1 and 2 among 70 methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates are presented in Table 3. In class 1+2 integrons, the gene cassette arrays blaoxa2 (60%) and aadA2 (40%) were identified.
Table 3.Different Sizes of Gene Cassettes of Integron Class 1 and 2 Among 75 Integron Positive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Hospital Wastewater
Integron and Gene Cassette ArrayIntegron Putative LocationAmplicon Size (bp)No. of Isolates a
Class 1 (50; 66.7)
aadBChromosome5313 (6)
aadA2Chromosome7924 (8)
blaoxa2Chromosome8287 (14)
cmlA6Chromosome13392 (4)
aacA4Chromosome8012 (4)
catB8Chromosome9014 (8)
orfD-blaoxa2Chromosome13042 (4)
orfD-aacA4Chromosome9965 (10)
aadB-cmlA6Plasmid19346 (12)
aadB-catB3Chromosome14205 (10)
aadB- aacA4-aadA2Chromosome26917 (14)
Putative glucose dehydrogenase- blaoxa2-hypothetical proteinChromosome19003 (6)
Class 2 (20; 26.7)
dhfrA1Chromosome4594 (20)
sat2Chromosome6615 (25)
dhfrA1-sat2Plasmid12144 (20)
dhfrA11Chromosome4743 (15)
Without PCR productChromosome-4 (20)
Class 1 and 2 (5; 6.6)
aadA2Chromosome7922 (40)
blaoxa2Chromosome8283 (6)

a Values are presented as No. (%).

Graphical depiction of the different cassette arrays present in class 1 and class 2 integrons
Figure 2.

Graphical depiction of the different cassette arrays present in class 1 and class 2 integrons

4.4. Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers

The nucleotide sequence data reported in this article are available in the GenBank nucleotide database under GenBank accession numbers PV870208, PV883328, PV883327, PV935384, PV935386, PV935387, PV940075, PV948192, PV948193, PX021438, PX021568 obtained from the gene cassette of class 1 integrons, and PV948188, PV948189, PV948190, PV948191, obtained from the gene cassette of class 2 integrons. Overall, 16 strains were sequenced.

5. Discussion

The analysis revealed that antibiotics such as tobramycin, fusidic acid, tigecycline, and quinupristin-dalfopristin exhibited the highest levels of activity against the tested S. aureus isolates. These results align with previous studies, including those by Rafati Zomorodi et al., who reported strong efficacy for linezolid and vancomycin (11), and Saedi et al., who observed high susceptibility rates (over 90%) for linezolid, vancomycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (12). Mupirocin continues to serve as a key topical antimicrobial for curbing S. aureus transmission and mitigating infection risks across both healthcare and community environments, as supported by earlier studies. In the current investigation, 24.2% of the isolates exhibited resistance to mupirocin, with the majority (79.3%) categorized as high-level mupirocin-resistant (HLMUPR) and the remaining 20.7% classified as low-level mupirocin-resistant (LLMUPR). The detected prevalence of HLMUPR-methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains in this study notably surpasses previously reported rates in countries such as China (7%), France (0.8%), and Canada (4.3%) (13-15). This considerable discrepancy underscores the geographic variability in mupirocin resistance patterns among methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates and emphasizes the critical role of regional surveillance in informing effective infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship efforts.
The distribution of iMLSB resistance phenotype among S. aureus isolates demonstrates considerable variability across different geographical regions and healthcare systems. In the present study, the prevalence of iMLSB was identified at 37.5%, which is higher than rates reported in Turkey (7.8%) (16), Egypt (7.7%) (17), Iran (8.6%) (18), and Nepal (11.48%) (19), but similar to the prevalence observed in India (37.5%) (20). Prior investigations in Iran have highlighted notable regional differences in iMLSB rates, ranging from 6% to 32.3%, reflecting the impact of localized antibiotic prescribing practices and diagnostic approaches. In addition, the cMLSB phenotype was observed in 46.7% of isolates. This finding aligns with previous studies, such as those by Delialioglu et al. (24.3%) (16) and Eksi et al. (20.4%) (21). Nevertheless, other investigations have documented widely differing rates, ranging from 13.1% to as high as 82.9%, depending on the location and study methodology. Such variation likely stems from differences in community and hospital-based macrolide consumption, study population characteristics, and the dissemination of specific clonal lineages. According to our data, the cMLSB phenotypes were relatively frequent among methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains (46.7%), a finding consistent with earlier studies from Nepal, Iran, Egypt, and Turkey (16-19).
Regarding fusidic acid resistance, recent reports from various Asian countries indicate low resistance levels, typically below 10%. Our study identified a fusidic acid resistance rate of 7.5%. These results are consistent with findings from a large multicenter Iranian study, which reported a 3% prevalence of fusidic acid-resistant methicillin-resistant S. aureus among 726 S. aureus isolates. An upward trend in fusidic acid resistance among methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates has been documented. For instance, data from Kuwait revealed a dramatic rise in resistance rates, escalating from 22% in 1994 to 92% by 2004 (22). While earlier reports from Iran suggested lower resistance levels ranging between 2.5% and 8% (23). Globally, resistance rates differ substantially, ranging from 62.4% in Greece to as low as 0.3% in the United States (24).
It is well established that integrons play a pivotal role in the dissemination of multidrug resistance among pathogenic bacteria (6). In the current study, class 1 integrons were the most frequently detected type, identified in 34.1% of the isolates. Class 2 integrons were present in 14.3% of samples, and a smaller proportion (5.6%) harbored both class 1 and class 2 integrons simultaneously. These findings, consistent with previous literature, emphasize the predominance of class 1 integrons over class 2 in S. aureus populations. Our data closely align with the report by Mohammadi et al. in Iran, where class 1 integrons were found in 24.8% of S. aureus isolates (25). Similar trends have been reported from clinical samples in Iran. In a multi-center study conducted by Zomorodi et al. on 183 S. aureus isolates, integron class 1 was detected in 7.6% of the tested isolates, while none were positive for class 2 (11). In a study performed in Iran on 139 S. aureus isolates, Mostafa et al. reported a prevalence of 72.6% and 35.2% of integron class 1 and 2, respectively (9). A study conducted in India in 2015 by Marathe et al. reported that 71% of the identified methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains harbored class 1 integrons, while none of the isolates tested positive for class 2 or class 3 integrons, indicating the dominant presence of class 1 integrons in the studied population (26). In contrast, research conducted by Guney in Turkey reported an absence of class 1 integrons among the examined isolates, emphasizing the substantial regional and bacterial diversity in integron distribution (27). Growing evidence points to class 1 integrons as major contributors to the dissemination of antibiotic resistance, especially in methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains. Variations in the occurrence of these genetic elements may stem from factors such as geographic location, clonal differences among isolates, and disparities in antibiotic prescription practices and overuse across regions.
In the current investigation, the most frequently detected gene cassettes within class 1 integrons were aadBaacA4aadA2, bla_OXA-2, and aadBcmlA6, followed by the aadB–catB3 cassette. A study conducted by Mostafa et al. in 2015 similarly identified aadB, aadA2, and dhfrA1sat2–aadA1 as the predominant cassette arrays. Their research also reported several novel gene cassettes in S. aureus isolates harboring class 1 integrons, including aadB, oxa2, aacA4, orfD–aacA4catB8, aadB–catB3, orfD–aacA4, and aadB–aadA1–cmlA6. In contrast, among class 2 integrons, the most common arrays were dhfrA1sat2–aadA1, dhfrA11, and dhfrA1sat2 (9). Between 2001 and 2006, Xu et al. analyzed a collection of nosocomial methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates and found that 76 out of 179 strains (42.5%) carried class 1 integrons (28). The most common resistance determinants were organized into four distinct gene cassette arrays: aadA2, aacA4–cmlA1, dfrA17–aadA5, and dfrA12–orfF–aadA2. Class 1 integrons are recognized for their ability to capture and disseminate diverse antimicrobial resistance genes, with aminoglycoside resistance cassettes being particularly frequent (9). Notably, these integrons have been associated with Tn3 family transposons, such as Tn21 and Tn1696, suggesting that the extensive distribution of class 1 integrons is likely driven by the mobility of integron-containing transposons (9, 29). Moreover, the distribution of Tn7 among clinical isolates has been shown to correlate with elevated rates of trimethoprim resistance, a phenotype conferred by the dihydrofolate reductase enzyme encoded by the dhfr gene located within Tn7 (9).
In our analysis, plasmid-borne integrases were detected in 13.3% (10/75) of the isolates, which is lower than those previous reports by Mostafa et al. (36%) and Goudarzi et al. (80%) in S. aureus (9, 29). It should be noted, however, that this estimate may be subject to bias, as plasmid and chromosomal DNA can exhibit similar electrophoretic mobility patterns. In a previous investigation, Goudarzi et al. characterized the genetic composition of integrons in S. aureus isolates and reported six distinct gene cassettes aadA, aadB, bla_OXA, aacA4, cmlA6, and catB within class 1 integrons. In addition, three gene cassettes dfrA1, aadA1, and sat2 were detected in class 2 integrons (29). These findings highlight the genetic diversity of resistance determinants harbored by integrons and underscore their potential role in facilitating the dissemination of multidrug resistance among clinical strains.
Despite the valuable insights provided, this study has several limitations. First, the study was conducted in only two tertiary care hospitals affiliated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other hospitals or regions. Second, only integron-positive S. aureus isolates were examined, so the overall prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in the total S. aureus population in hospital wastewater may not be fully represented. Third, molecular analysis focused on gene cassette arrays within integrons, but other resistance mechanisms, such as plasmids or transposons outside of integrons, were not evaluated. Finally, environmental factors and temporal variations beyond the 15-month sampling period may influence integron distribution, which were not comprehensively assessed.

5.1. Conclusions

This study shows that a considerable proportion of S. aureus isolates in the surveyed hospital wastewater harbor integrons, contributing to the potential spread of multidrug resistance. These findings reinforce the urgency of revising current infection control strategies and highlight that, in some cases, resistance may arise through mechanisms independent of integron carriage.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Tiwari A, Kurittu P, Al-Mustapha AI, Heljanko V, Johansson V, Thakali O, et al. Wastewater surveillance of antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens: A systematic review. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:977106. [PubMed ID: 36590429]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9798455]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.977106.
  • 2.
    Marutescu LG, Popa M, Gheorghe-Barbu I, Barbu IC, Rodriguez-Molina D, Berglund F, et al. Wastewater treatment plants, an "escape gate" for ESCAPE pathogens. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1193907. [PubMed ID: 37293232]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10244645]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1193907.
  • 3.
    Sabbagh P, Ferdosi-Shahandashti A, Rajabnia M, Maali A, Ferdosi Shahandashti E. Investigating Class I Integron and Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Klebsiella pneumonia isolates in Babol, North of Iran. J Med Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;8(1):24-8. https://doi.org/10.29252/JoMMID.8.1.24.
  • 4.
    Poudel AN, Zhu S, Cooper N, Little P, Tarrant C, Hickman M, et al. The economic burden of antibiotic resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18(5). e0285170. [PubMed ID: 37155660]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10166566]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285170.
  • 5.
    M G. Staphylococcus aureus: A brief review. Int J Veterin Sci Res. 2018;4(1):20-2. https://doi.org/10.17352/ijvsr.000031.
  • 6.
    Gillings MR. Integrons: past, present, and future. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2014;78(2):257-77. [PubMed ID: 24847022]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4054258]. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00056-13.
  • 7.
    Goudarzi H, Seyedjavadi SS, E Udo E, Beiranvand E, Fazeli M, Goudarzi M. Molecular Characterization and Distribution of Class 1 Integron-Bearing Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains in Burn Patients, Tehran, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2016;10(2). https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.40592.
  • 8.
    Tabatabaie Poya FS, Miri M, Salehi Z, Nasiri MJ, Dadashi M, Goudarzi M. Unveiling the Genetic Landscape of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Hospital Wastewaters: Emergence of Hypervirulent CC8 Strains in Tehran, Iran. Int J Microbiol. 2025;2025:5458315. [PubMed ID: 40114671]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11925629]. https://doi.org/10.1155/ijm/5458315.
  • 9.
    Mostafa M, Siadat SD, Shahcheraghi F, Vaziri F, Japoni-Nejad A, Vand Yousefi J, et al. Variability in gene cassette patterns of class 1 and 2 integrons associated with multi drug resistance patterns in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in Tehran-Iran. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:152. [PubMed ID: 26228695]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4521504]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0488-3.
  • 10.
    Moura A, Henriques I, Ribeiro R, Correia A. Prevalence and characterization of integrons from bacteria isolated from a slaughterhouse wastewater treatment plant. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60(6):1243-50. [PubMed ID: 17913715]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm340.
  • 11.
    Zomorodi AR, Motamedifar M, Rahmanian K, Shakeri M, Hajikhani B, Heidari H, et al. Investigation of integron classes 1, 2, and 3 among multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Iran: a multi-center study. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24(1):1430. [PubMed ID: 39696000]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11653917]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-10311-5.
  • 12.
    Saedi S, Derakhshan S, Ghaderi E. Antibiotic resistance and typing of agr locus in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical samples in Sanandaj, Western Iran. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2020;23(10):1307-14. [PubMed ID: 33149863]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7585536]. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijbms.2020.46064.10661.
  • 13.
    Dadashi M, Hajikhani B, Darban-Sarokhalil D, van Belkum A, Goudarzi M. Mupirocin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;20:238-47. [PubMed ID: 31442624]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.032.
  • 14.
    Desroches M, Potier J, Laurent F, Bourrel AS, Doucet-Populaire F, Decousser JW, et al. Prevalence of mupirocin resistance among invasive coagulase-negative staphylococci and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in France: emergence of a mupirocin-resistant MRSA clone harbouring mupA. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(8):1714-7. [PubMed ID: 23535880]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt085.
  • 15.
    Babu T, Rekasius V, Parada JP, Schreckenberger P, Challapalli M. Mupirocin resistance among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-colonized patients at admission to a tertiary care medical center. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(7):2279-80. [PubMed ID: 19474267]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2708468]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01834-08.
  • 16.
    Delialioglu N, Aslan G, Ozturk C, Baki V, Sen S, Emekdas G. Inducible clindamycin resistance in staphylococci isolated from clinical samples. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2005;58(2):104-6. [PubMed ID: 15858290].
  • 17.
    Kilany A. Inducible clindamycin resistance among clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Menoufia Med J. 2016;29(2). https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-2098.192418.
  • 18.
    Khashei R, Malekzadegan Y, Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie H, Razavi Z. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin B resistance among clinical isolates of staphylococci in southwest of Iran. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):711. [PubMed ID: 30305181]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6180372]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3817-4.
  • 19.
    Adhikari RP, Shrestha S, Barakoti A, Amatya R. Inducible clindamycin and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary care hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):483. [PubMed ID: 28693489]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5504788]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2584-5.
  • 20.
    Lall M, Sahni AK. Prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical samples. Med J Armed Forces India. 2014;70(1):43-7. [PubMed ID: 24623947]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3946413]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2013.01.004.
  • 21.
    Eksi F, Gayyurhan ED, Bayram A, Karsligil T. Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus strains recovered from southeastern Turkey. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2011;44(1):57-62. [PubMed ID: 21531354]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2011.01.011.
  • 22.
    Udo EE, Al-Sweih N, Mokaddas E, Johny M, Dhar R, Gomaa HH, et al. Antibacterial resistance and their genetic location in MRSA isolated in Kuwait hospitals, 1994-2004. BMC Infect Dis. 2006;6:168. [PubMed ID: 17125522]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1684259]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-168.
  • 23.
    Goudarzi M, Seyedjavadi S, Bagheri P, Dadashi M, Nasiri MJ. Prevalence and genetic characteristics of fusidic acid resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates: Emergence of t030 strains carrying fusB in Tehran, Iran. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2023;70(2):126-33. [PubMed ID: 36961740]. https://doi.org/10.1556/030.2023.01997.
  • 24.
    Hajikhani B, Goudarzi M, Kakavandi S, Amini S, Zamani S, van Belkum A, et al. The global prevalence of fusidic acid resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021;10(1):75. [PubMed ID: 33933162]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8088720]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00943-6.
  • 25.
    Mohammadi M, Bahrami N, Khajavian M, Faghri J. The Occurrence of Type I, II, and III Integrons in Multi-drug Resistance and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in Iran. Curr Microbiol. 2020;77(8):1653-9. [PubMed ID: 32279187]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-01956-x.
  • 26.
    Marathe NP, Nagarkar SS, Vaishampayan AA, Rasane MH, Samant SA, Dohe V, et al. High prevalence of class 1 integrons in clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2015;33(2):231-6. [PubMed ID: 25865973]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.154905.
  • 27.
    Guney AK. A Study on Class I Integrons and Antimicrobial Resistance among Clinical Staphylococci Isolates from a Turkish Hospital. Clin Microbiol. 2014;3(6). https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-5073.1000173.
  • 28.
    Xu Z, Shi L, Alam MJ, Li L, Yamasaki S. Integron-bearing methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci in South China, 2001-2004. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;278(2):223-30. [PubMed ID: 18096018]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00994.x.
  • 29.
    Goudarzi M, Seyedjavadi SS, Azad M, Goudarzi H, Azimi H. Distribution of spa Types, Integrons and Associated Gene Cassettes in Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated From Intensive Care Units of Hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2016;11(4). https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid.38813.

Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles