The ranges of
Aspergillus infections that may be acquired by individuals include: aspergilloma, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, invasive aspergillosis, sinusitis, otomycosis, ocular infections, CNS infection, osteomyelitis, cutaneous aspergillosis, endocarditis, urinary tract infection (
10). As a result, a rapid and reliable diagnosis test can play a critical role in the beginning of specific treatment and improvement of the patient survival quality. The presumptive diagnosis of aspergilloma is made by imaging, but the definite criteria for diagnosis rely on clinical and laboratory data. The common clinical signs of aspergilloma are chronic cough (the majority of patients have hemoptysis), malaise and weight loss. Specified laboratory tests, serological techniques based on detection of antibodies specific to an antigenic cell wall galactomannoprotein of
A. fumigatus are reliable (
11).
So far several literatures have discussed that GMP as a major cell wall component in
Aspergillus species and can also be secreted into the medium as a component of the exoantigen (
8,
12). Moreover, one of the critical points in designing an ELISA is the preparation of the antigen. The described method in this study, for the preparation of the ELISA antigen was highly effective, since it provided a good discriminative capacity between antibody-positive and negative samples. In this study, we described the standardization of an indirect ELISA test for the serological diagnosis of Aspergilloma. The indirect ELISA was designed for the large scale detection of antibodies to
A. fumigatus. The test was found very practical and simple to perform, providing in most cases a clear distinction between positive and negative sera. Most positive and negative sera could actually be identified visually; only in a few cases visual inspection was not sufficient to distinguish the differences between positive and negative samples, as immediately confirmed by OD analysis.
The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and precision calculated for ELISA in comparison with the Immunoblotting test, adopted as the golden standard. The easy method has shortened the required time of the test (approximately 1.30 hours for our ELISA kit, as opposed to 2.30 hours with others). This may be a substantial benefit when large numbers of samples should be tested. In addition, the test was shown to be very much relied on the repetitions led to the same (positive or negative) results. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA test is certainly related to the cut-off point (
13). The cut off was determined based on the mean OD of the actual negative population of sera. In order to establish a direct comparison with a widely used, commercially available ELISA, our ELISA kit was compared with the ELISA-IBL. In comparison, IBL ELISA presented slightly more sensitivity (95%) than the tested ELISA (94.2%). However, the specificity of our ELISA was slightly higher (99.5%) than the IBL ELISA (95%). A growing number of enzyme immunoassays for the serological diagnosis of Aspergilloma are being marketed around the world. However, to date, none of the diagnostic kits which are available for the serodiagnosis of Aspergilloma are produced in Iran, which has increased the need for importations, thus substantially increased the costs of serological tests. In order to find an alternative to the imported kits, we designed an ELISA kit. The test showed an adequate performance compared to the Immunoblotting assay.