In this study, the carriage rate of
enterococci in Kerman city, Iran was determined to be 8.14%, which is in agreement with the rates of reports by two Iranian centers (14% and 6.2%) (
13,
21). However, the findings of a study by Weinstein and et al. showed rates of 22.9% and 15.6%, which are more than that of our study (
24).
In Belgium cultured vaginal and rectal specimens from pregnant women at week 35 to 37 of gestation and vaginal colonization, showed
enterococci rate of 4.6% that was less than that found by our study (
25). In other studies,
Enterococcusfaecalis was 85% (the most prevalent species), followed by
E. faecium, which is the most common human pathogenic isolate (
10,
25,
26).
Enterococcus faecium has become increasingly prevalent in hospital-acquired infections (
25). All other enterococcal species together constitute less than 5% of enterococcal infections (
10,
25). In this study antimicrobial resistance pattern was indicated for
enterococci with four antibiotics. All isolates were sensitive to amoxicillin, gentamicin and vancomycin. In a review of urinary enterococci by Muratani conducted in Japan, it was shown that resistance to gentamicin in
E. faecalis and
E. faecium were 100% and 84.8%, respectively (
27).
Kacmaz from Turkey showed that there was a high level of resistance to gentamicin (22% of the isolates) by the disc diffusion method (
26). Busani in Italy showed that 41% of
E. faecalis isolates and 14% of
E. faecium isolates were resistant to gentamicin (
28). Norwegian patients were screened for rectal carriage of Ampicillin-resistant
enterococci (ARE) and high-level gentamicin-resistant
enterococci (HLGRE), and a total of 6.9% ARE carriers and 3.3% HLGRE carriers were detected (
29). In this study resistance to ciprofloxacin was 6.4% with maximum MIC of 16µg mL
-1, and all resistant
enterococci isolates to ciprofloxacin were
E. faecalis but all
E. faecium were sensitive to ciprofloxacin. Busani in Italy showed resistance to ciprofloxacin was 71% and 32%, respectively, for
E. faecium and
E. faecalis (
28). All isolates were sensitive to vancomycin and 20% of the isolates had intermediate reaction to vancomycin with MIC of 4 μg mL
-1. Vancomycin resistance was 20% in a review by Nateghian for
enterococci in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Iran (
18). Kacmaz showed that all isolates were resistant to vancomycin (
26). Vancomycin-resistant
enterococcus (VRE) have been reported among long-term dialysis patients (prevalence = 14%); there were significant associations between VRE and dialysis type (
30). No vancomycin resistance was seen in a study of muratani (30). Betriu’s study from Spain illustrated that resistance to vancomycin was 5.8% for
E. faecium and there was no resistance for
E. faecalis (
31). Cheng’s study from Hong Kong showed that resistance to vancomycin was 0.32% for
E. faecium (
5). High resistance to vancomycin in other countries is probably due to high usage of this antibiotic in comparison with Kerman city of Iran (
32).
There was no correlation between enterococci colonization rate and the demographic factors (
Table 1), while there was a correlation between enterococci colonization rate and history of membrane rupture (with OR = 3.18); the risk of
enterococci infection among pregnant women with a history of rupture is 3.18 times more than that of other groups. The obtained results in relation with
enterococci are conflicting with the demographic factors. Risk factors like gender, ward, duration of hospitalization and history of prior hospitalization of hospitalized women before childbirth were studied and there was no correlation between these variables and
Enterococci colonization. However, significant differences in demographic factors were not all the same (
17). Identification of risk factors for colonization requires further studies. In this study predominant species were respectively
E. faecalis 44 (89.8%),
E. faecium 3 (6.1%),
E. mundtii 1 (2.05%) and
E. raffinosus 1 (2.05%), which is in accordance with the findings of other conducted studies worldwide.
There may be more risk factors for enterococci colonization, which are still unknown and further studies with more samples are required to determine the relationship between these risk factors and enterococci colonization in pregnant women.