An accurate, in-time diagnosis of pneumococcal VAP, as an early-onset VAP agent, has been frequently hampered not only by the difficulties in bacterial isolation from the patient, but also by the misidentification of pneumococcus-like Viridans streptococci as
S. pneumoniae, especially in isolating the pathogen from the respiratory tract (
13-
15). To address this issue, researchers have introduced molecular methods including real-time PCR (
16). This study tried to determine the prevalence of bacterial agents of VAP, and to evaluate the presence of
S. pneumoniae in VAP- confirmed ICU patients by real-time PCR. The results showed that
Klebsiella pneumoniae followed by
Acinetobacter ssp. are the most prevalent VAP bacterial agents. All samples were negative for
S. pneumoniae in culture; however, in real-time PCR, two samples (4%) were positive for this pathogen with 4 × 10
4 and 1.6 × 10
5 CFU/mL bacterial load. These two samples contained 10 and 12 WBC/lpf, respectively. Age is one of the important risk factors for VAP. Similar to other studies, our results showed that VAP is more prevalent in elderly patients and is more seen in men than women (
17). To date, several
S. pneumoniae genes have been used to detect the pathogen, among which three most applied pneumococcal genes were
lytA,
ply, and
psaA that encode autolysin, pneumolysin, and surface adhesion A, respectively (
18). In a study performed by Adams et al., the specificity levels of
lytA,
psaA, and
ply for detection of
S. pneumoniae were reported 100%, 98%, and 81%, respectively (
12). According to the high sensitivity and specificity of
lytA, we selected this gene to investigate the presence and quantification of
S. pneumoniae in respiratory specimens of VAP patients. In this study, based on culture,
K. pneumoniae and
Acinetobacter ssp. were the most common pathogens isolated from VAP patients. In the Chi et al., study,
S. aureus and
A. baumanii were the first and second causative pathogens of VAP (
13). According to the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program operated in the US, Europe, and South America, P. aeruginosa (27%) was reported as the most common isolated VAP pathogen, followed by
S. aureus (20%) and
Acinetobacter ssp. (14%) (
19).
In general, there are few studies in Iran evaluating the frequency of bacterial pathogens in VAP patients. A study on the bacterial prevalence in VAP patients in Iran,
Enterobacteriaceae (35.4%),
S. aureus (20.7%), and Staphylococci spp. (14.7%), P. aeruginosa (11.3%),
A. baumannii (9.4%) and
Corynebacterium spp. (7.5%) were the most prevalent (
16). In another study in Iran, the most common isolated organisms were
Klebsiella spp. (36.36%),
Pseudomonas spp. (27.27),
Acinetobacter spp. (27.27), and
E. coli (9.09%) (
20). The results of this study are consistent with our findings. In addition,
A. baumannii, Methicillin-resistant S. aureus, and
P. aeruginosa were reported as the most prevalent bacteria isolated from VAP in ICU patents (
21). Beside the patient’s characteristics, the time of VAP development may also determine the causative pathogen. According to reports,
S. pneumoniae is responsible for relatively low rates (4.1%) of VAP (early VAP) worldwide, for which smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and the absence of prior antibiotic therapy were the main risk factors (
2,
4,
22).
The results of the real-time PCR showed that, although two samples were reported to be negative in culture, they were positive with higher counts than the threshold (10
4 CFU/mL) (
2). Negative culture results of
S. pneumoniae could be due to the fragile nature of the organism, previous antibiotic therapy of patients, low experienced technician, inaccurate laboratory handling, absence of bile solubility test, the presence of optochin-resistance strains, and more importantly, low efficacy of optochin disks (misidentification with non-pathogenic respiratory normal bacteria such as Viridans Streptococci group) (
23). In addition, the presence of many respiratory pathogens, including pneumococci as a part of normal respiratory flora in one hand, and the non-quantitative nature of conventional PCR and culture methods on the other hand, have made the issue more complicated. Accordingly, the accurate detection of respiratory infections is still a critical diagnostic problem, and therefore, a method being able to detect and quantify simultaneously the causative pathogen is appreciable (
22,
24,
25). To overcome these limitations, due to the ability of diagnostic species-specific real-time PCR, the present study used a quantitative real-time PCR for detecting and quantifying of Pneumococcal VAP with advantages of saving time and analyzing directly on clinical VAP specimen. Our study has some limitations, including the low numbers of clinical samples, possibility of contamination of tracheal aspirates with upper respiratory tract normal flora, and lack of full patient information.