The body weight of participants decreased from pre-training to post-training; however, the difference was not significant (50.3 ± 6.1 vs. 49.4 ± 5.7 kg, P = 0.053). The pre-training calcium intake estimated from diet records that used the food-weighing method was 439.5 ± 168.0 mg, which is well below the recommended Japanese National Dietary Reference Intake of 650 mg/day. A 300 mg oral calcium supplement increased the calcium intake to 720.6 ± 179.5 mg/day. The training rate during the six months was 82%, which means participants did leg-raise training 2.5 times per week on average throughout the period.
Six months of leg-raise training was associated with a significant increase in lumbar spine BMC and BMD in young women. Training had no significant effect on BMC or BMD at any proximal femoral site. The rectus abdominis and the underlying psoas major muscles are the agonist muscles during the leg-raise movement. The psoas major muscle directly connects the trunk and the lower extremities, with its origin in the lumbar spine and its insertion on the lesser trochanter. The leg-raise training applied a load at the lumbar spine that was beyond the mechanical stress experienced during daily life and was sufficient to increase BMC and BMD. High-load resistance training would be beneficial for increasing BMD, mainly in the lumbar spine (
6,
7).
Compared with exercises such as jumping from a standing position, which effectively increases BMC and BMD (
1,
8) at both the femoral neck and lumbar spine, lifting both legs from a supine position does not produce sufficient stress on the femoral neck region to increase BMC or BMD. During exercises performed in a standing position, the weight of the trunk, upper limbs, and head, as well as ground reaction force (GRF), are always applied as load in the femoral neck region. Even if the mechanical stress is not as great as a high-impact load, but is above a threshold, the stress, even at relatively low loads, will locally strengthen the target bones. The load stimulus produced by the pole push-off movement during six months of Nordic walking increased BMD in the stressed forearm by 3.4% (
9).
Axler and McGill (
10) calculated the moments applied to the fourth and fifth lumbar joints during abdominal exercises, including leg raises, using a mathematical link segment model and biologically based modeling techniques. According to their calculations, the momentum applied to the fourth and fifth lumbar joints during leg raises with bent knees was 1800 N; this value was 2500 N during leg raises with the lower legs extended.
GRFs of 2.5 × BW and 4.76 × BW (during take-off and landing, respectively) in young adults (
8,
9) are sufficient to stimulate bone (
1). High-impact exercise has a systematic, positive effect on the loaded axial and appendicular bones, indicating that high-impact GRF exercise programs, such as jumping, are specifically effective as site stimuli, not only for the lumbar spine but also for the femoral neck region.
Our study has some limitations, the duration was six months, and the sample size was selected to detect a change of less than 3 % in BMD, so any smaller magnitude or slower onset benefit of less frequent exercise may not have been detected in this study. Further research is thus needed to compare optimal frequencies of exercise over a longer duration. The major strength of this study is the use of a similar unilateral study design, a comparison of different measurement sites within the same participant, which reduces the likelihood that findings have been influenced by confounding factors such as changes in diet or habitual activity. High-impact jump training is effective for increasing BMC and BMD on both the lumbar spine and proximal femur in healthy young women. However, it would also be suggested that even the weight-bearing leg-raise training is effective for keeping the lumbar spine BMC and BMD, with sufficient diet and habitual activities.
In summary, the mechanical stress on the bone was site-specific, and the leg-raise training had an effect on the targeted lumbar spine but not on the proximal femur, confirming that the training only affected the area where the mechanical stress was applied.