The role of oxidative stress (OS) in exercise has been a subject of scientific investigation since the 20th century, when the presence of radicals in living cells was initially reported (
1-
3). This observation spurred extensive research into free radicals (FrRls) and cellular oxidation-reduction equilibrium (
4,
5), leading to the development of a new field focused on FrRls and the interplay between OS and cellular reduction (
2). In the late 1970s, theories connecting muscular exertion to increased oxidative damage began to emerge, laying the groundwork for contemporary exercise physiology. Numerous studies have since investigated the effect of exercise on markers of OS in athletes (
5). These studies suggest that prolonged (
6,
7) or high-intensity (
8,
9) exercise may elevate FrRls in active skeletal muscles, contributing to the development of OS.
Physiologically, OS represents an imbalance between FrRls and antioxidant (AntOx) status, leading to potential cellular damage, including lipid peroxidation and DNA damage (
10). This imbalance is exacerbated during intense physical activity, resulting in inflammation, muscle fatigue, and reduced muscle function (
11). However, exercise-induced OS can also stimulate adaptive responses, promoting muscle adaptation and improved performance over time (
12). Understanding the role of OS in physical activity is widely acknowledged in sports medicine, with substantial research expanding in this area over time (
2). FrRls generated during aerobic cellular metabolism are crucial regulators of signaling processes. The relationship between exercise and OS is complex and depends on the mode, intensity, and duration of exercise (
11). Regular training at moderate intensity reduces OS and improves health, while intense exercise can increase OS indicators. Muscle damage from severe exercise intensity refers to the structural and functional changes in muscle tissue (
13).
Muscle damage, often observed in prolonged (
14) or high-intensity (
15) exercise, refers to structural and functional changes in muscle tissue. This damage is closely linked with oxidative stress (OS) due to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during physical activity. These ROS can harm cellular components and contribute to symptoms such as inflammation and muscle dysfunction (
16). Cellular components, including lipids and DNA, can be affected by OS (
5). However, it is essential to note that exercise-induced OS can also trigger adaptive responses and promote muscle adaptation (
3,
17). Evidence from past studies indicates that various exercise protocols, including high-intensity (
18-
20) and prolonged (
21-
23) exercise, can increase muscle damage indicators. For instance, research by Lukas Cipryan and Leite et al. demonstrated that high-intensity training protocols in moderately trained males significantly increased muscle damage and OS biomarkers immediately post-exercise (
24). Similarly, studies by Paschalis et al. and Tzatzakis et al. highlighted significant changes in OS and muscle damage markers following endurance exercises (
23,
25).
The plasma concentration of F2–Isoprostanes (ISO) increased approximately 1.6-fold in response to activity but returned to pre-exercise levels within the first hour of recovery. In a study by Steensberg et al., eleven healthy male participants exercised on a treadmill for 2.5 hours, and the researchers reported a similar decrease in ISO levels after prolonged activity (
26). Burt et al. investigated the effects of exercise-induced muscle injury on physiological and metabolic responses before, during, and after submaximal running (
27). They observed that endurance exercise increased muscle soreness and creatine kinase (CK) concentrations as indicators of muscle injury. Additionally, He and Zhang reported an increase in CK following endurance exercise (
28). However, other studies investigating the impact of exercise on OS and muscle damage have shown varying findings (
2,
22,
29).
The consumption of local foods and nutritional products before, during, and after exercise has been explored to enhance athletic performance (
30). This approach aims to optimize performance and promote cognitive improvement by advocating the consumption of locally sourced foods alongside exercise. Implementing a diet plan that includes dietary supplements is essential for addressing nutritional deficiencies (
31), enhancing athletic performance (
32), and facilitating effective exercise recovery (
33). Natural and healthy supplements are typically less processed than imported foods, and it is fiscally prudent to consume them as dietary supplements rather than opting for more expensive alternatives (
34). Organic and locally sourced foods, such as carbohydrates (CHO), proteins (PRO), and antioxidants (AntOxs), generally offer more nutrients.
Sago (Sa) and soy (So) are two locally consumed sources of carbohydrates (CHO) and protein (PRO) in Southeast Asia, valued for their nutritional benefits. Sa contains 88% CHO in the form of the polysaccharides amylose and amylopectin, while So PRO is a combination of several essential amino acids, including leucine, isoleucine, and valine (
35). Sa and So are widely used in traditional regional dishes and local cookies. Unlike cultures where potatoes or grains are staple foods, Sa is a primary food source. In addition to potatoes, rice, and maize, people from these cultures incorporate Sa into their pasta dishes.
Numerous studies have examined the impact of isocaloric CHO-PRO supplementation on endurance performance. The goal of matching the energy content of CHO and PRO supplements is to investigate their effects on performance and recovery beyond just calorie content. Romano-Ely et al. compared CHO-PRO and isocaloric CHO supplements on muscle damage and fatigue (
36). They concluded that biomarkers associated with muscle damage decreased after exercise in the CHO-PRO condition, unlike the isocaloric CHO treatment. Abdul Manaf et al. conducted a study where cyclists were administered an isocaloric supplement comprising Sago+Soy (SS), Sa, or a sports drink. The supplementation, providing 24 kcal per 100 mL, was given to participants at 4 mL per kg of body weight in beverages at 30-minute intervals. They found no significant changes in creatine kinase (CK) after 24 hours of exercise (
37). Samaras et al. investigated the effects of CHO-PRO consumption on oxidative stress biomarkers during endurance exercise. Their study showed that CHO-PRO supplementation significantly reduced oxidative stress after exercise (
38). Meanwhile, Kerasioti et al. examined the effects of CHO-PRO intake on oxidative stress markers following exhaustive cycling (
39). They concluded that CHO-PRO and CHO supplements did not affect oxidative stress levels during heat exercise.
To the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated the potential differences in the effects of Sago (Sa) (CHO in its local form), Soy (So) (PRO in its local form), and isocaloric Sago+Soy (SS) (CHO-PRO combination) on biomarkers associated with muscle damage and oxidative stress (OS) during endurance exercise conducted under hot environmental conditions. This work builds on previous studies by examining the impact of consuming isocaloric Sa and So on muscle damage and oxidative stress indicators. Notably, this study is the first to explore these effects in a hot and humid environment (~31°C; 70% relative humidity).