The transcribed interview generated 20 single spaced pages. Foucauldian discourse analysis as explained by Carla Willig
[33] was adopted to analyze the interview transcript. Foucauldian discourse analysis (FDA)
[33] was a notable work of Michel Foucault and it helped in exploring the relationship between language and subjectivity. The analysis started by looking at the different stories as a whole, identifying the object within the context and the different discursive constructions that makes up the object. This led to the unravelling discourse(s) in relation to the subject position and subjective experience within the context.
FDA's six stage procedure explained by Carla Willig
[33] was the framework used in data analysis. In stage 1: I identified the different ways in which the object within a spoken topic was constructed (
Discursive constructions). Stage 2 included locating the various discursive constructions of the object within wider discourses (
Discourses). In the third stage of analysis, a closer examination of the discursive context was done to identify why the object is constructed in a particular way at a particular point in the text. Specifically, I looked at what its function is and its relation to other constructions produced in the surrounding text (
Action orientation). Subject position is the location of the individual within the rights and duties that provide meaning to the object that is spoken about. Thus, I identified the subject position within the discursive construction and discourses
(Positioning). Further, I looked at what can be said and done by the subjects positioned within the context. Particularly, this stage is concerned about the relationship between discourses and practices. It explores the ways in which discursive constructions and subject positions open or close down opportunities for action (
Practice).In the final stage of analysis focused on the individual's feelings and emotions that could be experienced from the subject's position held within the context spoken. More specifically, I explored the relationship between discourse and subjectivity (the way of being in the world and the way of seeing the world). This is the stage wherein I find the
subjectivity of the individual based on the context. Data credibility was strengthened with the discussion among the research associates until a consensus was reached. The categorization process was constantly reviewed by an expert researcher in qualitative research methods to make sure that the information that was collected was authentic.