Ovariectomized induced a significant decrease in PPAR-γ (P = 0.018), ALP (P = 0.015), and Osx (P = 0.027) gene expression in bone tissue (
Figure 2A, B, C). Due to menopause induction, the number of osteocytes (P = 0.001) and osteoblasts decreased, while the number of osteoclasts in bone tissue increased (P = 0.001).
Comparison of He-Co and OVX-Co: (A), PPAR-γ; (B), ALP; (C), OSX; (D), osteocytes; (E), osteoblasts; and (F), osteoclasts. Abbreviations: He-Co, healthy-control; OVX, ovariectomized; PPAR-γ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; OSX, osterix. #Signs of significant change in OVX-Co group. Information is reported based on mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Resistance training significantly increased bone PPAR-γ gene expression (F = 73.60, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.710). Supplementation also had a significant effect on bone PPAR-γ gene expression (F = 46.60, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.757). At the end of the period, bone PPAR-γ gene expression was higher in the Est group compared to the Vit D + Ca++ + Chit group (P = 0.001). The expression of this gene in both the Vit D + Ca++ + Chit (P = 0.001) and Est (P = 0.001) groups was higher than in the OVX-Co group. Although the highest expression of bone PPAR-γ gene was observed in the Vit D + Ca++ + Chit + RT and Est groups, their interaction was not significant (F = 1.45, P = 0.250, ƞ = 0.088).
There was no significant difference between the Vit D + Ca
++ + Chit + RT group and the Vit D + Ca
++ + Chit and Est + RT groups (P = 0.500) and the Vit D + Ca
++ + Chit group (P = 0.99). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma gene expression in the Est + RT group was significantly higher than in the RT group (P = 0.001) and the OVX-Co group (P = 0.001). There was no difference between the Est + RT group and the Vit D + Ca
++ + Chit group (P = 0.500). The expression of PPAR-γ gene in the RT group was lower than in the Vit D + Ca
++ + Chit group (P = 0.019) but higher than in the OVX-Co group (P = 0.001). There was a difference in the expression of this gene between the RT and Est-RT groups (P = 0.019). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma gene expression in the Vit D + Ca
++ + Chit group was lower than in the Est (P = 0.002) and OVX-Co groups (P = 0.001). There was a difference in the expression of PPAR-γ gene between the Est and OVX-Co groups (P = 0.001) (
Figure 3A).
Resistance training increased bone ALP gene expression (F = 12.39, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.292). Supplementation also had a significant effect on bone ALP gene expression (F = 40.92, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.732). At the end of the study period, bone ALP gene expression was lower in the Est group than in the Vit D + Ca++ + Chit group (P = 0.002). The expression of this gene in both the Vit D + Ca++ + Chit (P = 0.001) and Est (P = 0.001) groups was higher than in the OVX-Co group. The interaction between RT and supplementation (Vit D with Chit or Est) on ALP gene expression is significant and has an agonistic effect. The concurrence of these two interventions had an increasing effect on ALP gene expression (F = 5.71, P = 0.008, ƞ = 0.276).
Alkaline phosphatase gene expression in the exercise-Est group was different from the exercise group (P = 0.002) and the Vit D + Chit group (P = 0.038). However, the expression of this gene in the exercise-Est group was higher than in the Est (P = 1.00) and OVX-Co groups (P = 0.001). The expression of ALP gene in the exercise group was not different from the Vit D + Chit group (P = 1.00) but was different from the Est group (P = 0.022). The expression of this gene in the exercise group was higher than in the OVX-Co group (P = 0.001). Alkaline phosphatase gene expression in the Vit D + Chit group was no different from the Est group (P = 0.387) but was higher than in the OVX-Co group (P = 0.001). There was a difference in ALP gene expression between the Est and OVX-Co groups (P = 0.001) (
Figure 3B).
Resistance training increased bone Osx gene expression (F = 22.25, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.426). Supplementation also had a significant effect on bone Osx gene expression (F = 60.44, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.801). At the end of the study period, bone Osx gene expression was higher in the Est group than in the Vit D + Chit group (P = 0.001). The expression of this gene in both the Vit D + Chit (P = 0.001) and Est (P = 0.001) groups was higher than in the OVX-Co group. Although the highest expression of bone Osx gene was observed in the combination of exercise and Vit D + Chit and exercise-Est groups, the interaction of this intervention was not significant (F = 0.35, P = 0.703, ƞ = 0.023).
Osterix gene expression in the exercise-Vit D + Chit group was different from the exercise-Est group (P = 0.026) but showed no difference with the Vit D + Chit group (P = 0.061). The expression of this gene in the exercise-Vit D + Chit group was higher than in the exercise (P = 0.001), Est (P = 0.001), and OVX-Co groups (P = 0.001). Osterix gene expression in the exercise-Est group was higher than in the exercise group (P = 0.002), but not different from the Est group (P = 0.762), and higher than in the OVX-Co group (P = 0.001). Osterix gene expression in the exercise group was lower than in the Vit D + Chit group (P = 0.001) and no different from the OVX-Co group (P = 0.076), or the Est group (P = 0.991). Osterix gene expression in the Vit D + Chit group was higher than in the Est group (P = 0.370) and the OVX-Co group (P = 0.001). Osterix gene expression in the Est group was higher than in the OVX-Co group (P = 0.001) (
Figure 3C).
Resistance training increased the number of osteocytes (F = 748.97, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.961). Supplementation also had a significant effect on the number of osteocytes (F = 419.25, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.965). At the end of the study period, the number of osteocytes was lower in the Est group than in the Vit D + Chit group (P = 0.001). The number of osteocytes in both the Vit D + Chit (P = 0.001) and Est (P = 0.001) groups was higher than in the OVX-Co group. Exercise-supplementation interaction had a significant effect on osteocyte count (F = 10.57, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.413), enhancing each other's effect on osteocyte counts.
The number of osteocytes in the exercise-Vit D + Chit group was different from the exercise-Est group (P = 0.001), and significant in exercise-Vit D + Chit compared to the exercise groups (P = 0.001), Vit D + Chit (P = 0.018), Est (P = 0.001), and OVX-Co group (P = 0.001). The number of osteocytes in the exercise-Est group was higher than in the Est (P = 0.001) and OVX-Co groups (P = 0.001). The number of osteocytes in the exercise group was different from the Vit D + Chit (P = 0.001) and Est groups (P = 0.001), but higher than the OVX-Co group (P = 0.001). The number of osteocytes in the Vit D + Chit group was lower than in the Est group (P = 0.001) but higher than in the OVX-Co group (P = 0.001). The number of osteocytes in the Est group was higher than in the OVX-Co group (P = 0.001) (
Figure 3D).
Resistance training increased the number of osteoblasts (F = 103.25, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.775). Supplementation also had a significant effect on the number of osteoblasts (F = 75.70, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.835). At the end of the study period, the number of osteoblasts in the Est group was different from the Vit D + Chit group (P = 0.001). The number of osteoblasts in both the Vit D + Chit (P = 0.001) and Est (P = 0.001) groups was higher than in the OVX-Co group. The interaction between RT and supplementation (Vit D + Chit or Est) regarding the number of Osteoblasts in bone tissue was significant and has an agonistic effect, increasing the number of osteoblasts in bone tissue (F = 41.66, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.735).
The number of osteoblasts in the exercise-Vit D + Chit group was not different from the exercise-Est group (P = 0.096). However, the number of osteoblasts increased in the exercise-Vit D + Chit group compared to the exercise groups (P = 0.001), Vit D + Chit (P = 0.001), Est (P = 0.001), and OVX-Co group (P = 0.001). The number of osteoblasts in the exercise-Est group was higher than in the Vit D + Chit group (P = 0.096), exercise group (P = 0.001), Est group (P = 0.001), and OVX-Co group (P = 0.001). The number of osteoblasts in the exercise group was lower than in the Vit D + Chit (P = 0.001) and Est groups (P = 0.001), but no different from the OVX-Co group (P = 1.000). The number of osteoblasts in the Vit D + Chit group was different from the Est group (P = 0.001) but not different from the OVX-Co group (P = 1.00). The number of osteoblasts in the Est group was higher than in the OVX-Co group (P = 0.011) (
Figure 3E).
Resistance training reduced the number of osteoclasts (F = 115.20, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.793). Supplementation also had a significant effect on the number of osteoclasts (F = 66.95, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.817). At the end of the study period, the number of osteoclasts was different in the Est group compared to the Vit D + Chit group (P = 0.001). The number of osteoclasts in both the Vit D + Chit (P = 0.001) and Est (P = 0.001) groups was lower than in the OVX-Co group. The interaction between RT and supplementation (Vit D + Chit or Est) had an agonistic effect, increasing the number of osteoclasts (F = 25.35, P = 0.001, ƞ = 0.628).
The number of osteoclasts in the exercise-Vit D + Chit group was different from the exercise-Est (P = 0.001) and exercise (P = 0.001) groups. The number of osteoclasts was lower in the exercise-Vit D + Chit group than in the Vit D + Chit (P = 0.001), Est (P = 0.003), and OVX-Co groups (P = 0.001). The number of osteoclasts in the exercise-Est group was lower than in the Vit D + Chit (P = 0.001), exercise (P = 0.001), Est (P = 0.001), and OVX-Co groups (P = 0.001). The number of osteoclasts in the exercise group was different from the Vit D + Chit (P = 0.001) and Est groups (P = 0.023), but no different from the OVX-Co group (P = 1.00). The number of osteoclasts in the Vit D + Chit group was not different from the Est group (P = 1.000), but higher than the OVX-Co group (P = 0.001). The number of osteoclasts in the Est group was higher than in the OVX-Co group (P = 0.001) (
Figure 3F).
(A), PPAR-γ; (B), ALP; (C), OSX; (D), osteocytes; (E), osteoblasts; and (F), osteoclasts changes in OVX groups. Abbreviations: OVX, ovariectomized; PPAR-γ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; OSX, osterix; Sal, saline; RT, resistance training; Est, estrogen; Vit D, vitamin D; Chit, chitosan; Ca++, calcium. *Signs of a significant difference to the OVX-Co. †Signs of a significant difference to the Sal + RT group. ‡Signs of a significant difference to the Sal+ Est group. Information is reported based on mean ± standard deviation (SD).