According to our results, the training-celastrol group exhibited the highest levels of bFGF and IGF1 — both critical growth factors for tendon healing — while the sham group had the lowest levels. Similarly, COX2 expression was highest in the training-celastrol group, underscoring its importance in the recovery process. The PCR analysis revealed that scleraxis, periostin, MMP9, and collagen I expressions were significantly elevated in the training and celastrol groups, with the combined treatment group showing the most pronounced expression, indicating a synergistic effect on tendon repair. Histological assessments corroborated these molecular findings, with the training-celastrol group demonstrating the most organized collagen fibers, reflecting enhanced structural integrity of the healing tendon. Overall, these results suggest that combining aerobic exercise with celastrol significantly enhances tendon healing by promoting the expression of key cytokines and genes involved in tissue repair and remodeling. Furthermore, the correlation between the ELISA and PCR data highlights how increased expression of bFGF, IGF1, and COX2 corresponds with higher levels of scleraxis, periostin, MMP9, and collagen I — all of which are essential for effective tendon recovery. In the context of tendon repair, the temporal dynamics of inflammation are critical, as successful healing requires a well-regulated inflammatory response. Early inflammatory signals, including the elevation of COX2, are necessary for recruiting immune cells and initiating tissue regeneration. However, prolonged or excessive inflammation can be detrimental to recovery. Our findings suggest that celastrol’s anti-inflammatory properties may effectively modulate this response, counterbalancing the pro-inflammatory effects of elevated COX2. This interplay highlights the importance of timing and regulation in inflammatory processes, indicating that a controlled inflammatory environment can enhance tendon healing outcomes. Future studies should further explore these dynamics to better understand the balance between inflammation and repair in tendon injuries. In addition, while our study appropriately emphasizes the role of scleraxis and collagen I in tendon repair, it is essential to recognize the dual role of MMP9 in ECM dynamics. MMP9 contributes to matrix degradation, facilitating the remodeling process necessary for effective healing, and plays a critical role in activating latent growth factors. This activation is crucial, as it enables the release of bioactive peptides that promote cellular proliferation and migration, thereby enhancing tissue repair. Thus, MMP9 serves as a key regulator in balancing matrix turnover with the availability of growth factors, underscoring its significance in the tendon healing process. Further investigation into this dual functionality could provide a more comprehensive understanding of MMP9’s contribution to tissue regeneration. Histological analysis further supports these findings, showing that enhanced cytokine and gene expression corresponds with improved collagen organization and alignment. This comprehensive approach underscores the importance of integrating exercise and pharmacological interventions to optimize tendon healing outcomes.
Aerobic exercises have been shown to significantly enhance the healing process of various tendon injuries. They increase blood flow and oxygen delivery to the affected areas, thereby promoting tendon cell activity and accelerating recovery (
12). Furthermore, these exercises strengthen the muscles surrounding the tendon, helping to prevent overload and reduce the risk of re-injury. Aerobic activities also contribute to the regulation of inflammation and the balanced activity of tendinous cells, which supports a more effective healing process (
13,
14). The gradual mechanical loading associated with aerobic exercises aids in the remodeling of tendon structure, enhancing its function and resilience (
15). Numerous studies underscore the importance of aerobic exercise in tendon healing. For example, Fontana et al. investigated the combined effects of mesterolone and intensive treadmill training on Achilles tendon remodeling and observed significant structural improvements. Their findings suggest that mechanical stimuli from aerobic exercise and mesterolone can positively influence tenocyte morphology and tendon composition (
14). Magnusson et al. reported that exercise enhances collagen expression and synthesis in tendons, thereby impacting their molecular structure and overall integrity (
16). Alfredson et al. demonstrated the effectiveness of heavy-load eccentric exercises for treating chronic Achilles tendinosis, highlighting the therapeutic potential of targeted exercise protocols in promoting tendon healing (
17). Cook and Purdam proposed a load-induced tendinopathy model, emphasizing the central role of mechanical loading and exercise in the management and treatment of tendon injuries (
18). Kongsgaard et al. compared different therapeutic modalities — including eccentric decline squat training and heavy, slow resistance training — and found that both approaches improved tendon structure and function, further supporting the efficacy of exercise-based interventions (
19). Additionally, Chen et al. showed that a progressive exercise rehabilitation program significantly improved healing outcomes in male mice with supraspinatus injuries by enhancing tissue fusion and tensile strength (
20). Collectively, these studies affirm that aerobic exercise facilitates tendon healing by improving blood flow, enhancing muscle strength, modulating inflammation, and stimulating molecular and structural tendon remodeling.
Celastrol, a natural compound with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, shows considerable promise in enhancing tendon healing through multiple mechanisms. It reduces inflammation in injured tendons, thereby creating a favorable environment for healing, while its antioxidant effects help mitigate oxidative stress, promoting healthier tissue recovery (
21). Moreover, celastrol plays a regulatory role in MMPs, helping to maintain the balance between tissue degradation and synthesis (
22). Several studies have demonstrated celastrol's role in tissue regeneration. Wu et al. found that celastrol enhances the differentiation and self-renewal capacity of tendon-derived stem cells (
9). Wang et al. showed that celastrol alleviates joint pain and cartilage damage in osteoarthritis models by modulating gene expression pathways (
23). Guan et al. reported that celastrol improved muscle health in diabetic rats by boosting antioxidant levels and enzymatic activity (
24). Similarly, Gao et al. found that celastrol reduced inflammation and improved arthritis symptoms in rat models (
21). Hu et al. also highlighted celastrol’s potential in promoting bone wound healing (
10).
Despite significant research on tendon healing, the role of inflammation remains complex and not yet fully understood. Tendons typically heal through scarring, which often results in suboptimal functional outcomes. While inflammation is essential for tissue repair in regenerative contexts, its role in tendon healing is more problematic due to the tendon's limited regenerative capacity. Modifying the immune response during tendon injury may help foster a more pro-regenerative environment. Understanding the dynamics of immune cells and cytokines involved in tendon repair — particularly the timing and regulation of immune interventions — is critical to optimizing healing outcomes. Achieving a balanced inflammatory response is essential for effective tissue regeneration, as imbalances may lead to complications such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome or fibrosis. Emerging research highlights the involvement of a diverse range of cellular phenotypes in tendon healing, pointing to a complex interplay within the regenerative microenvironment (
25). Additionally, factors such as age, sex, and underlying metabolic diseases must be carefully considered when examining inflammatory mechanisms in tendon regeneration. Continued advancements in our understanding of immune responses may pave the way for the development of immune-modulatory treatments aimed at enhancing tendon repair and improving clinical outcomes.
Conversely, the expression levels of scleraxis, collagen type I, and MMPs are essential in the healing and remodeling of Achilles tendon tissue. Scleraxis, a tendon-specific transcription factor, promotes tenocyte differentiation and stimulates collagen synthesis — particularly collagen type I, which is crucial for providing tensile strength (
26). Elevated scleraxis expression enhances collagen production during tendon healing (
27). Collagen type I is the predominant structural protein in tendons. Its expression is tightly regulated throughout the healing process, initially increasing during the proliferative phase and then transitioning into the remodeling phase to improve fiber alignment and mechanical strength (
28). Maintaining a balance between collagen synthesis and degradation is vital; therefore, monitoring both collagen type I and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) levels is essential (
29). The MMPs, a group of proteolytic enzymes, facilitate ECM remodeling by degrading damaged collagen. However, excessive MMP activity can result in poor healing outcomes due to the breakdown of newly synthesized matrix components (
30). Thus, a proper balance between MMPs and their natural inhibitors is critical for effective tendon repair. Research indicates that fluctuations in the expression of scleraxis, collagen type I, and MMPs significantly impact tendon healing (
31,
32). Increased scleraxis expression correlates with enhanced collagen deposition, while dysregulated MMP activity may lead to excessive matrix degradation and compromised tendon structure. Understanding these molecular markers provides valuable insight into the pathophysiology of tendon injuries and offers direction for the development of targeted therapeutic interventions.
In contrasting our findings with those from chronic tendinopathy models, it is important to recognize the fundamental differences in the underlying pathophysiology between degenerative conditions and acute tendon ruptures. Chronic tendinopathy is characterized by a complex interplay of collagen disorganization, elevated MMP activity, and persistent inflammation, all of which impair healing and compromise structural integrity. In contrast, acute tendon ruptures typically follow a more straightforward healing trajectory, primarily focused on restoring the tendon’s structural integrity and function. Our study, which investigates the effects of aerobic exercise and celastrol on acute tendon healing, suggests a synergistic enhancement in healing outcomes — likely driven by increased collagen synthesis and improved fiber organization. In chronic tendinopathy models, however, therapeutic strategies may need to more directly target the underlying degenerative changes and persistent inflammation. This distinction underscores the necessity for tailored interventions based on the specific tendon pathology and highlights how our findings contribute to a broader understanding of tendon healing dynamics across varying injury types. Furthermore, it is critical to acknowledge species-specific differences in tendon healing. Rat tendons predominantly heal through scarring, whereas human tendons involve more complex processes, including regeneration and tissue remodeling. This disparity limits the direct applicability of findings from animal models to human clinical scenarios. While our results demonstrate promising effects of aerobic exercise and celastrol on tendon healing in rats, further research is essential to evaluate the translatability of these interventions to human tendon repair. Understanding these differences is vital for contextualizing our findings and guiding future studies aimed at developing targeted, clinically relevant strategies to enhance tendon healing outcomes.
5.1. Conclusions
This study examined the effects of combining aerobic exercise and celastrol treatment on Achilles tendon healing in male Wistar rats. The results indicated that this combined intervention significantly enhanced functional recovery, reduced inflammation, and modulated the expression of genes associated with tendon healing. Tensile testing and histological analysis further supported the therapeutic benefits of the combined treatment in promoting tendon regeneration. However, the study had several limitations, including a relatively small sample size and a short intervention duration of four weeks, which may not fully capture the long-term effects of the treatment. Therefore, future research involving larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods is necessary to validate these findings and assess their translational potential for human tendon healing.