1. Background
2. Methods
2.1. Hepatoblastoma Data Sets and Preprocessing
2.2. Inference of Sample Immune Score
2.3. Identification of Co-expression Network Modules and Immune-related Modules
2.4. Identification of Molecular Subtypes
2.5. Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes
2.6. Immune Cell Infiltration in Tumor Microenvironment
2.7. Functional Annotation and PPI Network Construction
2.8. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis
2.9. Prognostic Gene Signature-based Risk Score
2.10. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. High Immune Score in Hepatoblastoma Benefiting Survival of Patients
Prognostic value of immune score and identification of immune-related genes. (A) Kaplan-Meier curves showed that in the GSE75271, E-MAXP-1851 cohort, patients with higher immune scores had longer OS than patients with lower immune scores. (B) WGCNA identified 13 modules by unsupervised clustering. (C) The black module had the highest correlation with the immune score (r = 0.99, P = 2e-54), and the black module gene was called the immune score-related gene. (D) The gene significance and module membership of the genes in the black module exhibited a high correlation. (F) The forest plot with a hazard ratio for the genes of the univariable model in the black module. The hazard ratio below one indicated that a gene was negatively associated with the event probability and thus positively associated with survival time. The box size was based on precision, and the x-axis had a logarithmic scale (a bigger box size represented a more precise confidence interval (95% CI)).
3.2. Identification of a Gene Signature Associated with Immune Score
3.3. GO Analysis and Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis for Immune Score Related Genes
GO annotation and protein-protein interaction of immune score-related genes. (A) GO analysis was performed based on the 146 immune score-related genes. (B) The PPI network of immune score-related genes. (C) The MCODE algorithm was applied to this network to identify neighborhoods where proteins were densely connected. Each of the five colors represents five different MCODES.
3.4. Identification of Molecular Subtypes Based on Immune Score Related Genes in Hepatoblastoma
Identification of molecular subtypes based on immune score-related genes. (A) Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate survival differences between the two molecular subtypes. (B) Differently expression genes between the two molecular subtypes. (C) GO analysis. Red to blue indicated the number of p adjusted from large to small, and the length of the bar graph indicated the number of genes enriched. (D) Up-regulated pathways in GSEA analysis. (E) Down-regulated pathways in GSEA analysis. (F) The difference in the distribution of immune cells between subtype 1 and subtype 2.
3.5. Development and Validation of a Risk Scoring System Based on Immune Score Related Genes
Immune risk scoring system predicted OS in patients with hepatoblastoma. (A-C) Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the impact of the immune risk score on OS in the training set, the internal validation set, and the entire cohort. The red curves represented the high-risk score, and the blue curves represented the low-risk score. (D) The five-gene signature-based immune risk score in the prognosis of overall survival in the whole data. The black dot plots represented the distribution of immune risk scores, the blue and red dot plots represented the survival status of patients with hepatoblastoma, and the heat maps represented the expression of five genes (E). An ROC was used to evaluate the predictive ability of the immune risk scoring system in patients with hepatoblastoma in 1, 3, and 5 years. AUC, the area under the ROC curve. (F) The correlation between the risk score and the immune score. (E) The correlation between the immune risk score and the ssGSEA score of immune cells. The X-axis was the -log10P-value of the correlation coefficient. The lower right quadrant represented P < 0.05 and positive correlation, while the upper right quadrant represented P < 0.05 and negative correlation. The red dots represented immune cells with anti-tumor effects, the blue dots represented immune cells with protective effects on tumor cells, and the green dots represented cells with unclear effects on tumor cells.



