Several causes have been reported to lead to liver diseases and liver cirrhosis, including viral infections, cholestasis, metabolic diseases, alcohol consumption, and autoimmune diseases. In most cases, the exact mechanism underlying liver injury remains obscure and incompletely understood. At the same time, no specific etiology is identifiable in a considerable number of patients with liver cirrhosis despite extensive investigations (i.e., cryptogenic cirrhosis). Regardless, all patients with liver cirrhosis are predisposed to HCC. Accordingly, in the present case-control study, the gene expression of p53, a cell cycle regulator and a mediator of apoptosis, and the protein levels of AMPK and pAMPK, as p53 regulators, as well as AgNOR features, as cell proliferation indicators, were investigated in cirrhotic liver tissues obtained from patients with different liver diseases. In addition, due to the role of p53, AMPK, and pAMPK in the regulation of cellular metabolic pathways, we also explored these factors in the liver tissues of patients with simple steatosis.
Previous studies have confirmed a protective role for AMPK against liver fibrosis (
19,
20). In the present study, AMPK and pAMPK protein levels were increased in cirrhotic liver tissues, and this increase was more pronounced in patients with viral hepatitis. According to these results, two questions arise: (1) Why does fibrosis occur despite AMPK up-regulation and activation? (2) How do liver disease causes affect AMPK expression and activation? hepatocytes probably increase AMPK expression and activation in response to injuries; however, in the case of extremely severe and prolonged injuries, it cannot prevent the development of fibrosis. The effects of different causes of liver disease on AMPK expression and activation, and thereby, liver fibrosis, have not been elucidated despite extensive studies on the role of AMPK in the pathogenesis of liver disease due to various etiologies. A brief review of previous studies revealed that AMPK affects the development of liver fibrosis in most patients, particularly in those with HCV infection and fatty liver diseases. AMPK has been reported to decrease the expression of fibrosis-related genes in HCV-infected cells (
20). Other studies have shown that HCV core protein can affect AMPK activity and that HCV genome replication decreases AMPK phosphorylation (
21). Moreover, HCV genome replication is amplified by AMPK suppression and vice versa (
10,
22). In contrast, it has been shown that AMPK signaling inhibits liver fibrosis induced by alcohol consumption and following NASH (
19,
23). Therefore, AMPK overexpression in the liver seems to be a general response to cirrhosis, and this increase may be partially dependent on the etiology of liver disease, such as viral hepatitis and fatty liver. Interestingly, we also observed that AMPK and pAMPK protein levels were decreased, but not significantly compared to controls, in the liver tissues of patients with simple steatosis. Previous studies have shown that many of the medications suggested for NAFLD promote AMPK activation (
7), which can oppose steatosis development (
24). Thus, simple liver steatosis may be induced via AMPK downregulation and inactivation.
Regarding the role of p53 as a mediator of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis promoted by AMPK, p53 gene expression was assessed, and its potential correlation with AMPK and pAMPK levels was investigated in patients with liver cirrhosis. The results showed that there was no significant correlation between these parameters. As postulated in previous studies, p53 expression and activity are regulated by several mechanisms, and our findings indicated that the master regulator of p53 gene expression was independent of the AMPK signaling pathway in patients with liver cirrhosis (
25). Meanwhile, it was observed that p53 gene expression might be affected by the etiology of liver disease as only patients with AIH-, PSC-, and NASH-related cirrhosis had significantly higher p53 gene expression compared to the control group. Similar to p53 expression, AgNOR features were also significantly increased only in patients with AIH, PSC, and NASH, indicating a significant and positive correlation between AgNOR features and p53 gene expression in cirrhotic liver tissues. These findings suggest that patients with liver cirrhosis due to AIH, PSC, and NASH are predisposed to developing HCC. It has already been approved that HBV and HCV infections, as well as alcohol abuse, are the major risk factors for HCC (
26,
27). However, it should be noted that viral infections and alcohol consumption are the main causes of cirrhosis only in some geographical regions (
28,
29). Besides, specific laboratory tests for viral infections and a precise history taking can help identify many patients with HBV-, HCV-, and alcohol-related cirrhosis. However, there are no laboratory tests or definitive criteria for the diagnosis of AIH, NASH, and PSC. Thus, it is likely that a considerable percentage of AIH, NASH, and PSC patients will remain undiagnosed, so related cirrhosis will be named cryptogenic. In addition, autoimmune diseases play an important role in the pathogenesis of liver cirrhosis secondary to AIH, NASH, and PSC and their progression to HCC (
30). Progression to HCC has also been reported in NASH, even in the absence of cirrhosis (
31), suggesting shared pathologic mechanisms for these conditions. According to our findings, patients with liver cirrhosis due to AIH, NASH, and PSC are more likely to develop HCC than those with cirrhosis caused by viral infections and alcohol toxicity. Further studies are required to confirm this claim. Moreover, AgNOR features and p53 gene expression were similar in liver tissues obtained from patients with simple steatosis and control subjects. These findings suggest that cellular proliferation/apoptosis rates remain unaffected in patients with simple steatosis.
There are some worth-mentioning limitations in this study, including the small sample size, sample recruitment strategy (i.e., collecting cirrhotic liver tissues from patients undergoing liver transplantation), and lack of following patients up to monitor their long-term outcomes, including progression to HCC. Also, since gender might have been a confounding factor with regard to some liver disease etiologies, it is suggested to assess the variables studied here in each gender separately, demanding further investigations with different designs (like cohort studies) to determine whether etiologies such as PSC, AIH, and NASH can predispose patients to HCC.
In conclusion, we showed that AMPK and pAMPK protein expressions were increased in cirrhotic liver tissues obtained from patients with different etiologies, suggesting these mediators as parts of a general response to cirrhosis. In addition, the downregulation of AMPK and pAMPK may be an important mechanism of liver steatosis. P53 gene expression was increased in patients with liver cirrhosis, which was dependent on the etiology but independent of the AMPK signaling pathway. In parallel with p53 gene upregulation, AgNOR features were pronounced in patients with PSC-, AIH-, and NASH-related cirrhosis, showing a positive correlation with p53 gene expression. Overall, alcohol abuse and viral infections can be considered important risk factors for HCC.