This is the first study to examine CAM methods used by chronic hepatitis cases in Somalia, a sub-Saharan African country. The CAM is commonly used in Africa. In a study conducted in South Africa, this rate was found to be between 6% and 38% (
14). The CAM (4.7%) was also cited as a reason why Egyptian chronic hepatitis C patients rejected antiviral therapy (
15). A study in Uganda showed that 23% of hepatitis cases used herbal medicine. It was found that HCV patients believed that the simultaneous use of herbal and traditional treatments was more beneficial than for HBV patients. Additionally, CAM usage was higher in those who were followed for more than a year, unlike those who were newly diagnosed. It was shown that local, herbal treatments believed to be healing were generally used (
10).
Complementary alternative medicine use is not only common in Africa but also globally. In a study conducted in the United States, this rate was reported to be 42% (
16). In India, 68% of patients with cirrhosis were shown to use CAM (
17). In studies conducted in Asian countries, the rates were 17.1% in Japan, 18.6% in China, 71% in Singapore, and 72.7% in Korea (
18). Recent studies have shown similar rates and various CAM types (
16,
19,
20).
In Mogadishu, it was observed that patients frequently used honey, camel milk, and burning. Although only one case was reported in our study, drinking camel urine is one of the other methods used. An interesting aspect of CAM therapy is that 103 (34%) patients do not believe in or are not sure of its benefits despite using CAM therapy. However, those who used burning or honey reported a high rate of benefit from the treatment. No scientific studies show that these treatments are actually beneficial in cases of hepatitis. However, they may have had a placebo-like effect on patients.
Another interesting finding in the study is that patients who attend regular outpatient clinic controls prefer CAM treatment more. However, the rate is not high in patients who do not need antiviral treatment. The rate of CAM usage was found to be high, especially in the first five years of diagnosis. Cultural and social pressures and financial limitations may force patients to use such treatments rather than modern medicine. Additionally, the lack of information and guidance provided by healthcare professionals about such treatments may also contribute to this situation.
Herbal products are generally preferred in the treatment of hepatitis. Some studies prove the usefulness of botanical medicines with molecular methods. However, it is very important to prepare the product to be used for treatment with scientific methods and under appropriate conditions. Some studies have identified different toxic mixtures in herbal products. These include arsenic (40%), lead (60%), mercury (60%), and a range of other plant-derived hepatotoxic compounds, toxic industrial solvents, and alcohol. These substances can significantly increase patient mortality and morbidity. Recently, the US FDA and the Australian Department of Health have issued multiple warnings on contaminated and adulterated Ayurvedic products containing ingredients such as Azadirachta indica (Neem), Acorus calamus (Vacha or sweet flag), and various heavy metals that pose a threat to health and life (
21-
27).
Hepatitis patients who use herbal treatments in Mogadishu often prepare and use these treatments in non-laboratory settings and with unscientific techniques. As found in our study, some side effects are unavoidable. Physical examination of the patients who underwent burning treatment as CAM revealed burn scars on different parts of their bodies. A significant rate of side effects was also reported in patients using honey.
Sociodemographic characteristics are another important factor affecting CAM preference (
28,
29). A study conducted in Norway with 42,277 participants found that females were more likely to seek CAM treatment. In both genders, it was observed that the middle age group used CAM more frequently. Smoking was reported to be a factor reducing CAM usage (
30). In another study conducted in Turkey, it was observed that females with higher education levels resorted to herbal treatment more frequently (
31). Similarly, in our study, sociodemographic structure was found to have a significant effect on CAM use. It was noted that being uneducated, married, female, a housewife, and the region where the patients lived significantly increased the use of CAM. Especially in HBV cases, honey usage was higher. In addition, the older age of the patients was one of the most important factors increasing the rate of CAM usage.
Of course, the study has some limitations. First, since the study was planned as an epidemiologic baseline study, it is not possible to compare antiviral treatment with CAM. Secondly, since a face-to-face survey method was used, it cannot be known whether the participants were completely objective in answering the questions. Third, patients' laboratory values (such as HBV DNA PCR) were not included in the study because they were incomplete. Fourth, the type of treatment, dose, frequency, method of usage, and type of side effects were recorded based on patient declaration. Field practices were not conducted. Finally, no internationally validated scale was used.
5.1. Conclusions
Patients with chronic hepatitis in Mogadishu frequently resort to various CAM methods. Honey, camel milk, and burning are the most commonly used methods. Factors such as marital status, education level, number of wives, early years of the disease, regular polyclinic control, lack of antiviral treatment, belief in CAM, and recommendations from friends and family affect CAM preference. Although the rate of those reporting side effects related to CAM is not low, the rate of those who think they benefit from the treatment is quite high. Comparative studies with laboratory and molecular values are needed to distinguish whether this benefit is antiviral-like or placebo-like. In this study, the aim was to examine the epidemiologic status of CAM in chronic hepatitis cases in Somalia. Field practices should be planned to determine the exact benefits and side effects of CAM in the people of the region. Studies should be conducted in rural areas, and practices should be monitored in the field. If possible, close laboratory control should be performed.