To the best of our knowledge, it was the first report about prevalence of OCI in AIH patients. Until now, some studies have been conducted on OCI in patients with cryptogenic liver disease, patients on hemodialysis, and family members of patients with OCI. On the other hand, it has been shown that some patients with AIH are infected with occult hepatitis B virus (
20). In this study, according to our diagnostic method, there were no cases of OCI in patients with AIH. It should be emphasized that our method for diagnosing OCI was detection of HCV RNA in both ultracentrifuged serum samples and PBMCs. The gold standard for diagnosis of OCI is probing HCV RNA in hepatocytes; however, the data on liver biopsy were not available for all patients and therefore, we used this suggested alternative method (
3). It should be noted that at the time of study, all of the patients were under treatment for AIH.
For diagnosis of AIH, first we must rule out some disease, especially viral hepatitis like HCV infection by checking the anti-HCV antibody (
18). Today, OCI is a cause of cryptogenic liver disease (
1). Nevertheless, instead of assessing anti-HCV antibody, OCI is diagnosed with the aforementioned methods. According to the result of our study, there were no cases of OCI in patients with AIH and therefore, it seems that there may be no need to evaluate the OCI and usage of its diagnostic methods in AIH. However, two important issues should be taken into account: the sample size of our study and our diagnostic method, namely, detection of HCV RNA in PBMCs and in ultracentrifuged serum. It was reported that combination of these two diagnostic methods can lead to diagnosing of about 85% of OCI cases (
3). Then, for making a better decision on using OCI diagnostic method in routine diagnostic workup of AIH, more studies with more sample size and more accurate diagnostic approaches are needed.