3.2. Antiviral Therapy in Preventing MTCT of HBV
Considering these mechanisms, passive-active prophylaxis after birth can prevent transmission during delivery or in the postpartum period, but it has no effect on the intrauterine route of transmission. Other strategies have been tested in this setting, including antiviral drugs, pregnant women injected with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and mode of delivery (
28). The MTCT rate decreased from 90% to 10% due to the administration of passive-active immunoprophylaxis that injected HBIG within 24 h after birth (preferably within 12 hours) and injected 10ug HB vaccine at a different anatomical site. In addition, 10 ug HB vaccine was administered to the infants aged 1 and 6 months (
6,
29-
32). Studies have shown that the infants born to mothers with high viral load are more likely to be infected with HBV (
33,
34). Therefore, domestic and foreign guidelines recommend orally taking antiviral drugs during pregnancy to reduce the rate of MTCT (
Table 1). The efficacy and safety of LAM and LDT in preventing MTCT of HBV were appropriate before tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) went public (
35-
37). However, there are controversies regarding timing of initiation of antiviral therapy, HBV DNA levels at the onset of antiviral therapy, postpartum discontinuation time, etc.
| HBV DNA Level | Timing of Antiviral Therapy | Timing of Discontinuation | Antiviral Drugs |
|---|
| Consensus on clinical management of hepatitis B virus-infected women of childbearing age (38) | > 2 × 106 IU/mL | 24 - 28 week of gestation | Postpartum 1 - 3 months | TDF/LDT |
| Management algorithm for interrupting mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus (39) | > 2 × 106 IU/mL | 24 - 28 week of gestation | Postpartum 1 - 3 months | TDF/LDT |
| 2018 AASLD (4) | > 2 × 105 IU/mL | 28 - 32 week of gestation | Postpartum 1 - 3 months | TDF |
| 2017 EASL (40) | > 2 × 105 IU/mL | 24 - 28 week of gestation | Up to 12 weeks after delivery | TDF |
| 2015 APASL (41) | > 6 - 7 log10 IU/mL | 28 - 32 week of gestation | At delivery | TDF/LDT |
It is controversial to consider timing of initiation of antiviral therapy in pregnant women with high viral load in the second trimester or the third trimester of pregnancy. However, most studies suggest that there is no difference in the rate of blocking MTCT, regardless of the antiviral treatment during the second or third trimester of pregnancy. Pan et al. (
42) retrospectively enrolled 249 mothers with HBV DNA > 6 log10 copies/mL who received LAM during pregnancy and 66 and 94 subjects received LAM during the second and third trimesters, respectively. They found that LAM treatment initiated in the second or third trimester for mothers with HBV DNA levels below 9log10 copies/mL, was equally safe and effective in preventing vertical transmission. Tan et al. (
43) enrolled pregnant women positive for HBsAg who began LDT treatment before 14 weeks of gestation (early), between 14 and 28 weeks of gestation (late), or not at all (control). HBV MTCT rates in the early and late treatment and also in the control groups were 0, 0, and 4.69%, respectively. Sun et al. (
44) conducted a study that comprised pregnant women with CHB, with HBV DNA ≥ 1.0 × 10
7copies/mL as well as the increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. Groups A (n = 62) and B (n = 61) were treated with LDT initiated at 12 weeks or 20 - 28 weeks after gestation, respectively. No infants in groups A and B were HBsAg-positive, so they concluded that administration of LDT to HBV-infected mothers, started during early and middle pregnancy, completely blocked MTCT.
TDF is a nucleotide analogue and a potent inhibitor of HBV polymerase (
45-
47). After 6 years of monotherapy for CHB, no drug resistance was found and TDF is also currently the preferred drug for preventing MTCT of HBV (
48). Recent studies on the efficacy and safety of TDF in blocking MTCT during pregnancy are listed in
Table 2. The rate of MTCT in TDF group was significantly higher than that of the control group, regardless of whether oral TDF was administered in the second or third trimester of pregnancy, however there was no study on the comparison between the second trimester and third trimester groups. The study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2018 by Thai scholars suggested that there was no significant difference in the MTCT rate between the TDF and control groups, but the MTCT rate in TDF group was 0 and the sample size was small (
5). By enrolling more pregnant women, they probably obtained different results. The maternal and infant safety profiles were similar in the TDF and control groups. However, the long-term safety of infants born to mothers who used TDF during pregnancy needs further investigations (
49).
| First Author | Publish Date | Sample Size | Inclusion Criteria | Trial Design | Efficacy | Safety |
|---|
| Chen (50) | 2015 | 118 | HBsAg and HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA > 7.5log10 IU/mL | The mothers received no medication or 300 mg TDF daily from 30 - 32 weeks of gestation until 1 month postpartum. | Of the newborns, the TDF group had a lower rate of HBV DNA positivity at 6 months (P = 0.0481). | Maternal creatinine and CK levels, rates of congenital anomaly, premature birth, and growth parameters in infants were comparable in both groups. |
| Pan (51) | 2016 | 200 | HBsAg and HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA > 2 × 105 IU/mL | All participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio, to receive usual care without antiviral therapy or to receive TDF from 30 - 32 weeks of gestation until postpartum week 4. | Both in the intention-to-treat analysis (P = 0.007) and the per-protocol analysis (P = 0.01), at postpartum week 28, the rate of MTCT was significantly lower in the TDF group than that of the control group. | The maternal and infant safety profiles were similar in the TDF and the control groups, including birth-defect rates (2% and 1%; P = 1.00) |
| Wan | 2017 | 116 | HBsAg-positive, HBV DNA > 1 × 106 copeis/mL | Mothers were divided into the observation (orally taking TDF from the 28th week of gestation until the end of pregnancy) and control groups (no antiviral treatment). | The positive rate of neonatal HBsAg in the observation group (4.05%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (16.70%, P < 0.05). | The incidence of adverse reactions was low (5.41%). These adverse reactions were mild and improved after symptomatic treatment |
| Jourdain (5) | 2018 | 331 | HBsAg and HBeAg-positive, ALT < 60U/L | Mothers received TDF or placebo from 28 weeks of gestation to 2 months postpartum. | None of the infants in the TDF group and 3 infants in the placebo group had HBV infection at 6 months (P = 0.12). | There is no significant difference between two groups in adverse event of grade 3 or 4 or a serious adverse event of maternal and infants (P = 0.61) |
Different opinions are provided by different countries in their guidelines regarding the level of HBV DNA to initiate antiviral therapy. Zou et al. (
52) conducted a study that demonstrated HBV immunoprophylaxis failure occurred among infants born to HBeAg-positive mothers with HBV DNA levels > 6log10copies/mL. No immunoprophylaxis failure occurred in infants born to the mothers who were HBeAg-negative or had HBV DNA levels < 6log10 copies/mL. The HBV DNA level to initiate antiviral therapy in the 2017 EASL guidelines and 2018 AASLD guidelines were referred to these studies. Liu et al. (
53) enrolled 256 mother-child pairs with positive maternal HBsAg and they found that additional treatment strategies should be considered in HBeAg-positive mothers with an HBV DNA level above 6 - 7log10IU/mL. Korean scholars analyzed the cost‑effectiveness of antiviral prophylaxis during pregnancy and they found that it is advisable to augment the current national Perinatal Hepatitis B Prevention Program in Korea to provide antiviral therapy to women with HBV DNA ≥ 10
6 copies/mL during their late pregnancy (
54). However, the consensus on clinical management of HBV-infected women of childbearing age suggested that pregnant women with HBV infection, started antiviral therapy at 24 - 28 weeks of gestation with HBV DNA level > 2 × 10
6 IU/mL (
38). The management algorithm for interrupting MTCT of HBV recommended that when HBV DNA level is greater than 2 × 10
6 IU/mL, antiviral treatment can be done with either TDF or LdT (
39).
The time of antiviral therapy discontinuation for blocking MTCT is also controversial. The main concern is the liver dysfunction after discontinuation. Most pregnant women tend to have increased ALT after the discontinuation of antiviral drugs during pregnancy (
50). Therefore, more and more scholars are devoted to explore the optimal time for discontinuation to minimize the incidence of postpartum liver dysfunction. Nguyen et al. (
55) found liver dysfunction common after delivery and most of cases were recovered by themselves. Continuing oral antiviral drugs could not reduce the risk of liver dysfunction. Therefore, it is suggested that preventive antiviral therapy in pregnant women with immune tolerance should be discontinued after blocking MTCT. ter Borg et al. (
56) conducted a study on 38 pregnant women. It was found that the liver dysfunction in pregnant women before delivery was about 0.8 × ULN, and the proportion of liver dysfunction after delivery was as high as 62%, increasing to 1.6 × ULN, and the highest ALT level was 4.3 × ULN. However, the mechanism of liver dysfunction in pregnant women after delivery is controversial. It may be due to a series of changes in endocrine and immune system during pregnancy, which leads to the suppression of immune function and the rapid recovery of postpartum adrenocortical hormone levels. As with the activation of HBV after discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy, postpartum liver function is abnormal. At the same time, the mother's estrogen and progesterone levels drop rapidly after delivery, the cellular immune function recovers rapidly and induces the immune clearance of HBV, leading to postpartum liver dysfunction (
57-
60). Although the flares are often mild and resolved spontaneously, cases of acute liver failure have been described in the peripartum period (
25,
55,
61).