The present study evaluated 110 patients, including 81 diagnosed with PTC and 29 diagnosed with FED. Assessment of age and sex distributions revealed no statistically significant differences between the groups, indicating that the two groups were demographically comparable.
Cyclin D1 expression was examined in both groups. A statistically significant difference in Cyclin D1 expression was observed between patients with PTC and those with FED. Cyclin D1 positivity was observed in 100% of PTC cases compared with 86.2% of FED cases, suggesting that these two lesions exhibit distinct expression profiles. Nevertheless, because of the inherent constraints of the retrospective cohort design and the absence of standardized longitudinal follow-up, the present findings cannot establish whether FED functions as a precursor lesion that later develops into PTC.
These results are consistent with the study by Chui et al., who investigated Cyclin D1 expression in PTC and FED and reported higher positivity in PTC than in FED (
15). Conversely, Seybt et al. found no significant association between Cyclin D1 expression and PTC; this discrepancy may be explained by differences in study methods or the demographic characteristics of the populations examined (
16).
Although Gvianishvili et al., in a Georgian cohort, concluded that Cyclin D1 expression alone is not a dependable predictor of malignancy in patients with HT (
17), most available studies have indicated a strong relationship between Cyclin D1 expression and PTC. Nevertheless, additional research is necessary to define its precise contribution to tumor progression and to determine whether it can be used as a reliable biomarker in the management of PTC.
Kholová et al. documented Cyclin D1 expression in 67.5% of FED cases, a frequency lower than that found in the current study. This variation may be related to differences in study populations, methodological approaches, or laboratory sensitivity. It may also indicate underlying clinical or genetic heterogeneity of FED across different patient cohorts (
10).
Furthermore, the present findings showed lymph node metastasis in 28.4% of PTC cases. This observation indicates that metastasis is an important feature of PTC and may be linked to its specific biological and pathological mechanisms.
Toraih et al. performed a large-scale investigation involving 89,694 patients with PTC over a 21-year period and reported metastasis in nearly 42% of cases (
18). Likewise, Tang et al. observed central lymph node metastasis in 67.8% of patients with PTC (
19). These reports highlight variability in metastatic rates among patients with PTC. By comparison, the current study identified a metastasis rate of 28.4% among PTC cases, reflecting a relatively lower prevalence. Such differences may stem from variations in methodology, sample size, patient demographics, or study duration. The lower metastasis rate in the present cohort may also be associated with population-specific characteristics.
In a 2020 systematic review from China, Mao et al. reported several major predictors of lymph node metastasis in PTC, including age younger than 45 years, male sex, multifocality, tumor size greater than 1 cm, tumor location, capsular invasion, and extrathyroidal extension. Conversely, bilateral tumor involvement and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis were not significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (
20).
In this study, follow-up information was collected through telephone interviews. For patients with PTC, the follow-up assessment addressed survival status and history of recurrence. For patients with FED, follow-up was restricted to survival status and questions regarding subsequent thyroid-related clinical problems. At follow-up, all patients in both groups were reported to be alive. However, because outcome assessment was not conducted according to a standardized protocol and information on persistent disease, biochemical markers, and imaging findings was not systematically obtained, the prognostic value of these observations remains limited. Therefore, further prospective studies are required to more clearly define the clinical significance and biological behavior of FED and its relationship with PTC.
Grogan et al. evaluated mortality during long-term follow-up of patients with PTC and reported that disease-specific deaths may occur many years after treatment, underscoring the need for lifelong surveillance (
21). Although the short-term prognosis in the present study appears favorable, the possibility of recurrence or delayed complications may persist.
Dong et al. carried out a 10-year investigation including 466 patients with PTC and reported mortality rates of 2.1% during 10 - 20 years and 0.85% during 20 - 30 years (
22). Compared with the present findings, in which all patients were alive and free of reported recurrence at follow-up, these results emphasize that long-term risks may remain despite favorable early outcomes. These observations further support the importance of continued follow-up even after apparent clinical resolution.
5.1. Conclusions
In this study, Cyclin D1 expression differed significantly between PTC and FED developing in the background of HT. Cyclin D1 positivity was identified in all PTC cases, whereas a lower frequency was observed among FED cases. These results suggest distinct Cyclin D1 expression patterns in PTC and FED. However, because of the retrospective cohort design and the absence of standardized longitudinal follow-up data, it cannot be determined whether FED represents a precursor lesion that progresses to PTC. Although some investigators have proposed that FED may be a potential premalignant lesion in the setting of HT, this possibility remains hypothetical and cannot be confirmed from the current findings. Further studies with larger sample sizes and extended long-term follow-up are needed to clarify the potential clinicopathological relevance of Cyclin D1 expression in these lesions.
5.2. Limitations
A major limitation of this retrospective cohort study is the lack of standardized long-term longitudinal follow-up. Therefore, although Cyclin D1 expression differed between PTC and FED, the present study cannot determine whether FED acts as a precursor lesion that progresses to PTC. Moreover, only short-term clinical status was assessed, whereas a comprehensive evaluation of disease outcomes requires long-term follow-up and analysis of long-term clinical endpoints. Another limitation is that Cyclin D1 was evaluated as the only biological marker, although other molecular and clinicopathological factors may also influence the biological behavior of these lesions. In addition, treatment-related adverse effects and their possible impact on patients’ quality of life were not investigated.
Finally, the relatively limited sample size, particularly in the FED subgroup, may have reduced statistical power and limited the generalizability of the findings. Larger multicenter studies incorporating standardized long-term follow-up and comprehensive molecular profiling are required to more accurately define the biological significance of FED and its potential association with PTC.