The present study found that either preoperative systolic or diastolic blood pressure was basically stable when adequate doses of α-receptor blockades had been administered, and neither was correlated with intraoperative maximum AP in patients with pheochromocytoma. We also demonstrated that log 24-h urinary-fractionated MN and NMN was correlated with intraoperative maximum AP. In addition, log 24-h urinary-fractionated MN and NMN, DM, and one or more of the classic triad were independent factors associated with intraoperative maximum AP. Thus, PPGL patients with these clinical factors might be at risk for hypertensive crises during surgery regardless of preoperative α-receptor blockades.
PPGL presents with various life-threatening complications, including cerebro-cardiovascular disease, HTN, and DM. Falhammar et al. showed that HTN and DM were present in 67% and 27% of patients with PPGL, respectively (
12). Although our results showed that the incidence of these comorbidities were lower than reported (45.9% and 9.8%, respectively), in our cohort, tumor size was smaller than that of the cohort of Falhammar et al. (
12) (median tumor sizes of 38 mm vs. 49 mm). These results indicated that patients in our cohort were diagnosed relatively early, and detecting the tumor while still small might reduce the prevalence of complications associated with PPGL.
PPGL also presents with a wide spectrum of symptoms related to excessive catecholamine secretion. The classic triad, which include palpitation, headache, and episode of sweating (the acronym PHE is reminiscent of pheochromocytoma), is valuable for screening symptoms for pheochromocytoma diagnosis. All three symptoms have specificities and sensitivities of more than 90% (
13). However, recent retrospective reports have indicated that only 17% - 24% of pheochromocytoma cases exhibit all three symptoms (
12,
14). In our cohort, the percentage of patients exhibiting all three symptoms of the classic triad was even lower; patients exhibiting at least one of the three symptoms accounted for only 26.2% of cases. This could be because the patients in our cohort were diagnosed with PPGL relatively early, as mentioned earlier. Taken together, the results indicate that the classic triad is unreliable for modern PPGL diagnosis. However, our study revealed that the presence at least one symptom of the classic triad was associated with intraoperative maximum AP. Consequently, the presence or absence of the classic triad should be confirmed to assess the preoperative severity of PPGL, even after it has been diagnosed.
In our study, intraoperative maximum AP was a primary outcome and assessed as a continuous variable; we confirmed that it was normally distributed. To examine the association of preoperative continuous variables with intraoperative maximum AP, it was necessary to validate their distributions. Factors that might be related to tumor growth, such as tumor size or 24-h urinary-fractionated metabolism of catecholamines, did not show normal distributions. However, the logarithmic representation of these continuous variables showed normal distributions. Interestingly, the logarithmic representation of tumor markers is important in assessing the progression or stage of particular types of cancer (
15-
17). Twenty-four-hour urinary-fractionated MN or NMN is used for biochemical screening but not disease progression or severity. Therefore, these values are considered important only for functional diagnosis of PPGL and evaluation of how many folds higher they are above the upper limit of normal (the cut-off value suggested by Japanese guidelines is three-fold). However, our results indicated that the 24-h urinary-fractionated metabolism of catecholamines should be evaluated as a logarithmic representation, similar to tumor markers; moreover, the logarithms of these variables were correlated with intraoperative maximum AP. Additionally, it was also indicated that evaluation of the sum of MN and NMN could reflect the severity of hormone secretion more accurately than either value alone.
Many experts, as well as Endocrine Society guidelines, continue to recommend preoperative α-receptor blockades to prevent hemodynamic instability and hypertensive crises for all patients with PPGL (
5,
18). In an observational study, Groeben et al. reported that there was no difference in the incidence of excessive hypertensive crises between pheochromocytoma patients who had been administered α-receptor blockades and those who had not (
6). They questioned whether all patients with pheochromocytoma require preoperative α-receptor blockades as prophylaxis. They also proposed that preoperative α-receptor blockades might not be mandatory for pheochromocytoma patients with low endocrine activity because of minimally invasive surgical techniques and highly effective drugs for intraoperative control of hemodynamic conditions. Unfortunately, we were not able to assess mild cases that might not require preoperative treatment. Meanwhile, our results revealed severe cases that were at risk for intraoperative hypertensive episodes regardless of preoperative α-adrenergic receptor blockers; therefore, patient selection is essential when considering precision preoperative management. We believe that PPGL patients can be divided into at least two categories: moderate and severe cases. Based on the opinion that there are some patients who would not require preoperative α-receptor blockades, mild cases can be added. Thus, there could be three categories. Adequate doses of preoperative α-receptor blockades would be expected to have an effect on moderate cases. However, preoperative α-receptor blockades alone might not be enough in severe cases, which have high levels of log 24-h urinary-fractionated MN and NMN, DM, or one or more of the classic triad. In these cases, additional preoperative interventions, such as metyrosine, which is catecholamine synthesis inhibitor, might help to stabilize intraoperative blood pressure.
Our results should be interpreted with caution because of several limitations. There were some ascertainment biases, which are inherent limitations of all retrospective observational analyses. Since the primary outcome was not perioperative hemodynamic instability, post-surgical hypotension and the use of catecholamines were not evaluated. Even though this study was not small compared with similar single-center studies, validation with a larger cohort would be required, mainly due to the rarity of PPGL. Also, we could not assess plasma free MN in most cases due to the system of Japanese insurance. Moreover, we were not able to decide the cut-off reference for log 24-h urinary-fractionated MN and NMN. To resolve these limitations, we will need to compare the accuracy of plasma free MN or urinary-fractionated MN for predicting intraoperative maximum AP in a larger cohort through a multi-center study.
5.1. Conclusions
Log24-h urinary-fractionated MN and NMN, DM, and one or more of the classic triad were independent factors associated with intraoperative maximum AP in patients with PPGL. Patients with these factors might be at risk for hypertensive crises during surgery regardless of preoperative α-receptor blockades. Clinicians should confirm these independent factors before surgery for PPGL and manage these patients more carefully and effectively.