In this review, for the first time, we investigated the association of DII, as a proxy for the inflammatory entity of the diet, with MetS and CIMT among children and adolescents. Accordingly, we found a signal for the harmful effects of DII for MetS among two out of four studies. In terms of subclinical atherosclerosis as assessed by CIMT, this was found only in one study conducted among overweight and obese Iranian pediatrics.
Using 45 dietary components, DII was presented as a tool to assess the inflammatory potential of a diet (
10); hence, it was expected that higher DII would be associated with cardiometabolic disorders, cancer, and mortality events (
15,
29-
31). Meta-analysis in adults, using both cross-sectional and prospective studies, found higher DII was associated with more than 20% higher risk for MetS (
17). However, no significant association was found between the DII and the risk for MetS in another meta-analysis conducted among adult populations (
15). The different results in studies examining the association between DII and MetS might be explained by important factors such as different methods for dietary assessment (FFQ vs dietary records vs 24-hour dietary recalls), variation in the number of food items to estimate DII, sample size, age range of study population, MetS definition (IDF vs ATP), and level of adjustment for confounders; the factors that applied to studies conducted in both adults as well as children and adolescents; the issue that was also addressed in the current study (
Table 1).
In our review, we summarize the findings from three cross-sectional studies that examined the association of DII with MetS and its components. Seremet Kurklu et al., among 343 Turkish adolescents aged 10 - 16 years, assessed the DII-MetS relationship, using DII scores calculated based on three consecutive days of food records, and found that the fourth quartile of DII was accompanied by an odds ratio of 2.6, but this value did not reach significance due to the limited number of events (95% CI: 0.82 - 8.28). Moreover, a more pro-inflammatory diet was associated with higher fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and triglyceride (TG) levels (
26). In another study conducted among school-age Latin American (6 - 12 years), Wang et al. noted a one-unit increment was associated with a 20% odds ratio for prevalent MetS; the associations were mainly attributable to a strong relationship between DII, TG, and DBP (
27). Jia et al. leveraged data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database 2001 - 2018, using DII calculated from 24-hour dietary recall to determine its association with MetS and its components, and found that high DII is strongly associated with prevalent high blood pressure (odds ratio: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.02 - 5.07) but not MetS (
28).
Regarding prospective studies, the first study was conducted by Betanzos-Robledo et al., who examined the association between the inflammatory status of diets collected from infancy with MetS among young Mexican adults. They found that cumulative exposure of DII as assessed by area under the curve (AUC of DII) was positively associated with MetS z-score; the relationship was mainly explained by the strong association of DII with SBP and DBP (
25). To our literature review, no other studies directly examined the association between DII/C-DII with MetS; however, other studies assessed this relationship for insulin resistance (IR). For example, using repeated measurements of diet quality and cardiometabolic risk (CMR) among Mexican children and adolescents aged 8 - 14 years, the higher C-DII was not associated with log HOMA-IR even in the crude model; however, among different components of MetS, the significant association was demonstrated for log TG in the multivariate analysis (
32). In a British birth cohort study, ALSPAC, the investigators found that higher C-DIS at 7 years was significantly associated with higher cardiometabolic risk score [estimated using mean sex-specific z-scores from TG, HDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), mean arterial blood pressure, HOMA-IR, and fat mass index] at both 17 and 24 years. The investigators concluded that a more pro-inflammatory diet during childhood was accompanied by an unfavorable cardiometabolic profile in adolescents/early adulthood (
33).
As another aim in our review, we assessed the relationship between the inflammatory potential of the diet with subclinical atherosclerosis as assessed by CIMT. Using two inflammatory diet scores (literature-derived inflammatory diet score and GlycA-derived inflammatory diet score) other than the DII score, Davis et al., among 11 - 12-year-old Australian children, observed no trace of association between inflammatory scores and CIMT. Reporting a negative regression coefficient for the association between Literature-derived inflammatory diet score and CIMT, while noting a positive relationship for the GlycA-derived inflammatory diet score; however, none of these reached statistical significance (
18). In another cross-sectional study among Iranian children and adolescents, the authors found that an increasing value of the DII score was associated with high CIMT (≥ 0.43 mm) in the multivariate analysis (
19). Lastly, in the ALSPAC study, no association was found between increasing value of C-DIS score at three age stages of 7, 10, and 13 years with CIMT at both 17 and 24 years (
20).
It was shown that systemic immune–inflammation index and systemic inflammatory response index can be used for the early diagnosis of MetS in pediatric obesity patients (
34). Moreover, chronic inflammation, driven by poor dietary patterns, plays an important role in increasing blood pressure through endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness, and oxidative stress, all of which contribute to early vascular damage and elevated cardiovascular risk (
35,
36). Similarly, an inflammatory dietary profile contributes to increased inflammatory cytokine production, oxidative stress, and lipid metabolism disorders, ultimately raising TG levels (
37).
Some of the strengths of the present study are the systematic and comprehensive search within important literature databases, screening and quality assessment independently by two reviewers, and the study quality assessment by NOS. There are a number of limitations in the current review. First, the included studies exhibited heterogeneity in terms of study design, sample size, MetS definition, and geographic distribution. Second, there was a variation in dietary assessment methods and DII calculation across studies, as different food frequency questionnaires and dietary recall methods may yield inconsistent DII scores. Therefore, due to the heterogeneity of the extracted data, a meta-analysis was not feasible. Third, the majority of studies utilized a cross-sectional design, limiting the ability to establish causal relationships between DII and MetS or CIMT.
In conclusion, we found an important link between the DII and MetS; however, findings regarding this relationship between DII and subclinical atherosclerosis are very limited. Future reviews should emphasize the association between DII and MetS components rather than MetS or CIMT per se, especially high blood pressure and dyslipidemia, as found in the included studies.