The TTS has demonstrated a bidirectional and complex association between thyroid physiology and T2DM over 18 years. Longitudinal trends toward lower TSH and relatively higher FT4 levels were associated with an increased incidence of T2DM in joint longitudinal/time-to-event analyses. In addition, cross-sectional and cohort analyses from the TTS demonstrated that both overt and subclinical hyperthyroid states are associated with a higher prevalence of hyperglycemia and an increased incidence of T2DM (
14,
15). Lower FT4 values were associated with insulin resistance and components of metabolic syndrome in sex-specific analyses within the euthyroid range (
16,
17,
20). Novel indices of central and peripheral thyroid hormone sensitivity, including TFQI, PTFQI, TSHI, and TT4RI, derived within the TTS identified physiological variation associated with prevalent T2DM and prediabetes, suggesting that these metrics may capture clinically relevant endocrinologic heterogeneity not evident from TSH and FT4 alone (
18,
19). Conversely, individuals with T2DM or prediabetes did not uniformly exhibit an increased adjusted incidence of thyroid dysfunction in the TTS, although specific patterns, such as a greater prevalence of subclinical hyperthyroidism among individuals with diabetes, warrant further investigation (
21). Taken together, the TTS findings provide a consistent picture of heterogeneity, showing that dynamic longitudinal changes and static indices of thyroid function and sensitivity influence glycemic outcomes.
In the TTS, thyroid hormone sensitivity indices, including TFQI, PTFQI, TSHI, and TT4RI, have shown consistent associations with diabetic phenotypes in cross-sectional analyses. These findings indicate that variation in central feedback sensitivity or peripheral hormone responsiveness may have biological and clinical relevance (
18,
19). Such indices may improve risk stratification among euthyroid individuals with TSH and FT4 values within the reference range. They may also serve as intermediate phenotypes for mechanistic investigation. However, most available data are observational and cross-sectional. Prospective studies are needed to validate these associations and determine the predictive value of these indices for incident T2DM.
Sex-stratified analyses in the TTS indicated that some associations, such as those between FT4 and HOMA-IR or insulin resistance, were stronger or present only in men (
20). This finding is consistent with previous literature showing sex-specific variation in thyroid epidemiology and metabolic interactions (
16,
20).
The apparent discrepancy between Amirabadizadeh et al. (
14), who found an association between thyroid hormone changes and T2DM, and Mehran et al. (
17), who found no association between thyroid hormone variations and high FPG, likely reflects differences in study methodology and design. The joint longitudinal/time-to-event model examines within-person trends and individual risk, whereas the generalized estimating equation approach assesses population-average associations. Differences in outcomes, analytic methods, sample size, and hormone variability likely explain these contradictory results.
The TTS findings align with several international studies that have also reported links between thyroid function and T2DM. In the Rotterdam Study, Chaker et al. observed that higher TSH, even within the reference range, was associated with a greater incidence of T2DM, whereas higher FT4 was protective (
22). A meta-analysis of 12 prospective cohorts also indicated that elevated TSH was associated with a 17% higher risk of diabetes and that lower FT3 and FT4 were significantly associated with increased risk, with nonlinear, J-shaped, or inverted J-shaped relationships (
9). Another systematic review found that hypothyroidism, whether clinical or subclinical, conferred a higher diabetes risk and that even lower-normal FT4 values were linked to T2DM incidence (
8). Importantly, Mendelian randomization analyses have provided additional insights. Su et al. reported a causal association between genetically elevated TSH and hypothyroidism and T2DM, combining National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data with genetic factors (
23). Genetic analyses also show that higher normal-range FT4 may protect against metabolic syndrome, including raised FPG, and that TSH is associated with lipid abnormalities (
24).
The physiological mechanisms linking thyroid status and glucose homeostasis are well established and multifactorial. Thyroid hormones increase hepatic glucose output, stimulate lipolysis and free fatty acid flux, alter insulin clearance and peripheral insulin sensitivity, and change body composition and energy expenditure. These pathways can accelerate dysglycemia in states of thyroid excess (
7). In contrast, chronic insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, and metabolic and inflammatory changes associated with T2DM may affect hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis set points and peripheral thyroid hormone metabolism. These mechanisms may help explain why the association between T2DM and new-onset thyroid disease is attenuated after statistical adjustment in the TTS cohort (7, 21).
4.1. Clinical Implications
Current TTS data support heightened clinical vigilance for dysglycemia in patients with overt or subclinical hyperthyroidism and suggest that thyroid variation may identify individuals at greater metabolic risk even within the reference range (
14,
15,
16). Nevertheless, no available observational evidence, including evidence from the TTS, supports generalized thyroid treatment to prevent T2DM. Randomized clinical trials are required to determine whether treating subclinical thyroid dysfunction or modulating thyroid hormone sensitivity indices affects T2DM risk or glycemic control. In this regard, limited intervention studies of levothyroxine and insulin resistance are promising but remain inconclusive (
11).
4.2. Limitations
Although the TTS has several strengths, including extended follow-up and repeated measurements, it also has limitations. These include confounding typical of observational designs, potential selection and survivor biases over extended follow-up, and limited power for rare exposures, such as overt hyperthyroidism, in some subgroup analyses (
14,
15,
16,
17,
21). Furthermore, most studies of sensitivity indices are cross-sectional, and these indices have not been examined using repeated measurements in a cohort study. These indices require external validation in other ethnic and geographic populations before they can be widely used in clinical practice (
18,
19).
4.3. Directions for Future Research
Future research should focus on several interconnected areas. First, prospective studies are needed to determine whether thyroid sensitivity indices can predict the development of T2DM beyond established risk scores. Second, mechanistic studies in humans and animal models are essential to clarify the causal pathways linking thyroid function dynamics with insulin action and beta-cell function. Third, randomized controlled trials should evaluate whether interventions targeting subclinical thyroid dysfunction or modulating thyroid hormone signaling can influence the incidence of T2DM. Finally, Mendelian randomization analyses using large genome-wide association study summary datasets and pooled genetic data from TTS participants and external datasets are needed to investigate the causal effects of TSH, FT4, and thyroid sensitivity indices on the risk of developing T2DM.
4.4. Key Messages
Over 18 years, the TTS showed that trends toward lower TSH and relatively higher FT4 levels are associated with an increased incidence of T2DM. Overt and subclinical hyperthyroidism are associated with hyperglycemia. Thyroid hormone sensitivity indices, including TFQI, PTFQI, TSHI, and TT4RI, capture physiological variation linked to T2DM and prediabetes that is not detected by conventional TSH or FT4 measurements. Current evidence supports targeted metabolic monitoring in patients with thyroid excess or abnormal sensitivity indices, but not routine thyroid treatment solely for the prevention of T2DM.