Since 1990, there has been a tremendous progress in increasing the amount of adequately iodized salt, and as a result, many countries are now on the threshold of achieving IDD elimination; thus, the emphasis will shift to ensuring that the achievements are well sustained for all time. National (n = 121) or large subnational (n = 31) UIC surveys have been done in 152 countries, representing 98% of the world’s population (
12,
13). In 2014, iodine intake was adequate in 112 countries, deficient in 29 countries, and excessive in 11 countries (
13). The number of iodine-sufficient countries increased from 67 to 112 during the last 10 years (
13). Therefore, the main task in most countries will now be to sustain adequate iodine nutrition for their populations. A limitation of these data is that only a few countries (including IR Iran) have done national UIC surveys in pregnant women, a key target group. Large populous countries that are still iodine deficient include not only developing countries (e.g., Ethiopia, Morocco, and Mozambique) and countries in transition (e.g., Russia and Ukraine), but also several high-income countries (e.g., Denmark, Italy, and the UK) (
13). Moreover, in several high-income countries, including the USA and Australia, iodine intakes have decreased in the past 30 years (
14). Results of surveys suggest that many pregnant women in both developing and high- income countries, including the UK and the USA, have deficient iodine intakes (
15), However, in some countries of the world, iodine supplementation has not been implemented and in many countries, the iodine nutrition supplementation in place is defective and does not reach the recommended levels of daily consumption. Therefore, in 2005 the world health assembly (WHA) once again passed another resolution to encourage the member states to strive for the elimination of iodine deficiency (
16).
There are many important factors which influence the success and, in particular, the sustainability of an effective IDD elimination program (Box 2). As an example, The Islamic Republic of Iran (IR Iran), a developing country in nutrition transition, has been successful in conducting a sustainable program for more than 2 decades (
17,
18). Changes in total goiter rate and median urinary iodine concentration in the past 2 decades in this country are shown in
Figure 2.
The lack of success in controlling and monitoring iodine deficiency in many countries presents a dismal picture. Proper estimations of iodine levels in salt factories, retailers, sellers, and households are not regularly done in many countries, and iodine measurement is performed only in a few countries affected by IDD, and others do not have supporting iodine laboratory network. Many countries fail to establish sustainable IDD control programs. The major obstacles faced today are as follow (
19):
1- Legislation at government level is ineffective if no enforcement is in place. Many countries of the world lack effective legislation for USI, which has resulted in mild to moderate iodine deficiency and inadequate support for brain development in infants in these countries.
2- Political stability plays a major role in programming successful maintenance of a public health program. Many countries have not been successful in legislating, initiating, or successfully maintaining elimination of IDD, as their public health program has been damaged by political instability, change of officials, and health priorities and programs.
3- Current government policies in many countries favor decreased salt consumption in an attempt to reduce hypertension. This should be considered in programs of iodine supplementation through USI, and while advertising for low salt intake, 40 mg/kg (ppm) or precisely determined appropriate amounts of iodine should be added to the salt, taking into consideration the mean daily salt consumption of the specific populations. The logo should be “take less salt, but take only iodized salt”.
In conclusion, iodine deficiency continues to be a major health problem in many countries. This is mainly due to the inefficient participation of the related policymakers, lack of function of national IDD committees, insufficient collaboration between health care providers, IDD experts, salt producers, communication specialists and consumer associates, and lack of efficient monitoring system for national country programs.