Int J High Risk Behav Addict

Image Credit:Int J High Risk Behav Addict

Prevalence of Workplace Violence and Associated Factors Among Medical Interns: A Cross-Sectional Study in Southeastern Iran

Author(s):
Narjes SargolzaeiNarjes SargolzaeiNarjes Sargolzaei ORCID1, 2, Saeedeh SarhadiSaeedeh SarhadiSaeedeh Sarhadi ORCID3,*, Omid SoufiOmid SoufiOmid Soufi ORCID4
1Clinical Immunology Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
2Department of Community Medicine, Medical School, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
3Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
4Medical School, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran

International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction:Vol. 15, issue 1; e167123
Published online:Dec 23, 2025
Article type:Research Article
Received:Oct 12, 2025
Accepted:Dec 15, 2025
How to Cite:Sargolzaei N, Sarhadi S, Soufi O. Prevalence of Workplace Violence and Associated Factors Among Medical Interns: A Cross-Sectional Study in Southeastern Iran.Int J High Risk Behav Addict.2025;15(1):e167123.https://doi.org/10.5812/ijhrba-167123.

Abstract

Background:

Workplace violence (WPV) against medical interns in underserved regions like Zahedan, Iran, is poorly documented.

Objectives:

This study aims to determine the prevalence and determinants of WPV against medical interns in southeastern Iran.

Materials and Methods:

In this cross-sectional study, we consecutively recruited medical interns from Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (2023 - 2024). Data were collected using a validated Persian questionnaire based on the International Labor Office/World Health Organization/International Council of Nurses (ILO/WHO/ICN) tool, covering physical, verbal, sexual, and ethnic violence.

Results:

Most interns (80%) experienced verbal abuse. Additionally, 24% reported physical violence, 23.5% encountered ethnic violence, and 12% experienced sexual harassment. Regression analysis identified key risk factors: Female interns had higher risks of physical and sexual violence, and emergency department assignment increased the risk of physical violence. Longer internship duration was linked to higher odds of verbal, sexual, and ethnic violence. Crucially, underreporting was systemic; only 17% of victims filed formal reports, mostly because they believed reporting was futile.

Conclusions:

Workplace violence against medical interns in Zahedan is highly prevalent and underreported. To ensure trainee safety, structured interventions are urgently needed, including mandatory training, stronger legal protections, and improved hospital security.

1. Background

Workplace violence (WPV) against healthcare workers is a major global public health problem that threatens workforce retention and patient care quality (1). The World Health Organization (WHO) defines WPV as "incidents where staff are abused, threatened, or assaulted in circumstances related to their work" (2). This includes physical violence, verbal abuse, sexual harassment, and psychological aggression (3). Medical interns are especially vulnerable due to their trainee status, limited experience, and unclear authority within hospital hierarchies (4).

Globally, healthcare workers face a 16 times higher risk of WPV than other professionals (5), with trainees disproportionately affected (6). Annual incidence rates are alarming, with systematic reviews estimating that 8 - 38% of healthcare personnel experience physical violence and 12 - 75% face verbal abuse each year (7). These rates are often higher in teaching hospitals; for example, 68% of interns in Turkey (8) and 72% in Pakistan (9) report WPV exposure.

This study uses the framework of the International Labor Office/World Health Organization/International Council of Nurses (ILO/WHO/ICN) Workplace Violence Questionnaire (10). This framework views WPV as resulting from a combination of individual, perpetrator, organizational, and socio-environmental factors. It provides a structure to analyze the types of violence, perpetrator characteristics, institutional context, and impacts on health workers.

In Iran, factors like economic instability, healthcare system pressures, and patient dissatisfaction have led to more WPV incidents (11). National studies show that 45 - 53% of Iranian physicians and trainees experience verbal or physical violence (12-15). However, underreporting is severe. For instance, 78% of interns in Tehran's teaching hospitals did not report incidents, mainly due to fears of academic retaliation (16).

Beyond physical harm, WPV causes significant psychological damage to trainees, leading to anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress (16). These effects often reduce clinical performance and care quality (17), and contribute to early career burnout and attrition (18). A 2023 meta-analysis found that 86% of affected healthcare workers had psychological symptoms lasting over six months (19). Workplace violence also has high institutional costs from staff turnover, lost productivity, and malpractice risks (20).

Despite existing evidence, a key gap remains: There is little understanding of how local sociocultural and institutional factors shape WPV in underserved regions like Sistan and Baluchestan Province. Previous Iranian studies mainly report national prevalence, but lack a detailed analysis of how ethnic diversity, local gender norms, and specific institutional cultures affect WPV dynamics against interns.

Therefore, this study addresses this gap. We used the ILO/WHO/ICN Questionnaire to examine WPV prevalence, types, and associated factors among medical interns at Zahedan University. We specifically investigated how local sociocultural factors (e.g., ethnicity, gender) and organizational determinants influence WPV risk and experience. This approach provides a nuanced, theory-based analysis to inform preventive programs in this high-risk setting.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

This study employed a cross-sectional (descriptive-analytical) design. The target population consisted of medical internship students at Zahedan University of Medical Sciences during the academic year 2023 - 2024.

Inclusion criteria were: Medical interns who had completed at least one 6 months clinical rotation in Zahedan’s teaching hospitals, and willingness to participate in the study. A census sampling approach was initially planned. During the study, 248 interns were present, with at least 6 months of internship. However, due to eligibility requirements (willingness to participate, and absence of leave), the final sample comprised 200 medical interns from Zahedan University of Medical Sciences in 2023 - 2024.

2.2. Ethical Consideration

The study received approval from the Ethics Committee of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (ethical code: IR.ZAUMS.REC.1401.376). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrollment. Interns received explanations about the study’s purpose, voluntary participation, and data confidentiality. Written informed consent was obtained before distributing questionnaires.

2.3. Data Collection

Data were collected using: Demographic information (age, gender, rotation department, and duration of internship) and the Workplace Violence in the Health Sector Questionnaire, developed by the ILO, WHO, and ICN (10). This questionnaire contains 53 items across four domains: Physical violence (15 items), verbal violence (13 items), sexual violence (12 items), and racial/ethnic violence (12 items), and an additional section: 16 items on responses to violence and suggested interventions.

To assess content and face validity, the Persian version of the questionnaire was reviewed and approved by a panel of 11 experts, including four nurses, two psychologists, two psychiatrists, one social worker, and two nursing managers. The experts evaluated the questionnaire for clarity, relevance, and cultural appropriateness, and their recommendations were incorporated. The Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR) were calculated and found to be within acceptable ranges (CVI > 0.80 and CVR > 0.78), confirming the adequacy of the instrument’s validity. To determine reliability, the questionnaire was administered to 180 health professionals twice with a 15-day interval. The test-retest correlation coefficient was r = 0.71, indicating acceptable reliability of the instrument (14).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS v.26. Descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage) summarized baseline characteristics. In order to determine predictors of WPV against medical interns, first, we performed univariate analysis (χ², independent t-test) and variables that were statistically significant were included in the logistic regression model, with a significance level set at 0.05.

3. Results

A total of 200 medical interns participated in the study, with a nearly equal gender distribution and a mean age of 25.31 ± 2.58 years. The sample was drawn from various rotation departments, with internal medicine being the most common (25%), as detailed in the participant characteristics.

Workplace violence was highly prevalent among the interns. Verbal abuse was the most common form (80%), followed by physical (24%), ethnic (23.5%), and sexual violence (12%). Patient relatives were the most frequently reported perpetrators for physical and verbal violence.

Statistical analyses revealed significant associations between WPV types and demographic/work-related factors. A strong gender disparity was observed (Table 1). Female interns reported significantly higher rates of physical violence (32.1% vs. 13.6% in males, P = 0.002) and were disproportionately affected by sexual violence (20.5% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001). In contrast, no significant gender differences were found for verbal or ethnic violence.

Table 1.Association Between Gender and Different Types of Workplace Violence a
Type of Violence, GenderYesNoTotalP-Value
Physical0.002
Male12 (13.6)76 (86.4)88 (100.0)
Female36 (32.1)76 (67.9)112 (100.0)
Verbal0.569
Male72 (81.8)16 (18.2)88 (100.0)
Female88 (78.6)24 (21.4)112 (100.0)
Sexual< 0.001
Male1 (1.1)87 (98.9)88 (100.0)
Female23 (20.5)89 (79.5)112 (100.0)
Ethnic0.572
Male19 (21.6)69 (78.4)88 (100.0)
Female28 (25.0)84 (75.0)112 (100.0)

a Values are expressed as No. (%).

A longer internship duration was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of experiencing verbal, sexual, and ethnic violence (Table 2). Furthermore, the clinical environment and internship duration were also critical factors. Interns in the Emergency Department experienced a significantly higher incidence of physical violence compared to those in hospital wards (32.3% vs. 12.6%, P < 0.001), as shown in Table 3. No significant variations in WPV were found across different shift times.

Table 2.Association Between Internship Duration and Different Types of Workplace Violence
Type of ViolenceValuesP-Value
Internship duration (mo); mean ± SD
Physical0.986
Yes (n = 48)10.58 ± 3.93
No (n = 152)10.59 ± 2.57
Verbal0.002
Yes (n = 160)10.91 ± 2.98
No (n = 40)9.30 ± 2.43
Sexual< 0.001
Yes (n = 24)15.20 ± 1.79
No (n = 176)9.95 ± 2.46
Ethnic0.034
Yes (n = 47)11.38 ± 3.01
No (n = 153)10.34 ± 2.89
Table 3.Comparison of Workplace Violence Types Based on Shift Time and Department a
VariablesPhysical (N = 48)Verbal (N = 160)Sexual (N = 24)Ethnic (N = 47)P-Value
Shift time0.533
Morning15 (20.0)44 (58.7)3 (4.0)13 (17.3)
Afternoon9 (17.3)32 (61.5)3 (5.8)8 (15.4)
Night24 (15.8)84 (55.3)18 (11.8)26 (17.1)
Department< 0.001
Hospital ward27 (12.6)130 (60.7)19 (8.9)38 (17.8)
Emergency21 (32.3)30 (46.2)5 (7.7)9 (13.8)

a Values are expresses as No. (%).

Multivariable logistic regression (backward conditional model) confirmed these patterns (Table 4). Key predictors included:

- Physical violence: Female gender (OR = 2.62) and assignment to the Emergency Department (OR = 3.97).

- Sexual violence: Female gender was the strongest predictor (OR = 34.96), along with a longer internship duration (OR = 3.20).

- Verbal and ethnic violence: A longer internship duration was a significant risk factor for both (OR = 1.23 and OR = 1.13, respectively).

Table 4.Multivariable Logistic Regression (Backward Conditional Model) Predicting Workplace Violence Against Medical Interns a, b
VariableOdds Ratio95% CIP-Value
Physical violence
Gender (female vs. male)2.6201.241 - 5.5300.012
Department (emergency vs. hospital ward)3.9701.746 - 9.0280.001
Verbal violence
Duration of internship (for each month of increase in the internship period)1.2291.076 - 1.4040.002
Sexual violence
Gender (female vs. male)34.9573.420 - 357.3100.003
Duration of internship (for each month of increase in the internship period)3.2011.984 - 5.165< 0.001
Ethnic violence
Duration of internship (for each month of increase in the internship period)1.1271.007 - 1.2610.037

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.

a Model fit statistics: Physical violence model: Nagelkerke R² = 0.15, Hosmer-Lemeshow test P-value = 0.45; verbal violence model: Nagelkerke R² = 0.08, Hosmer-Lemeshow test P-value = 0.62; sexual violence model: Nagelkerke R² = 0.28, Hosmer-Lemeshow test P-value = 0.18; ethnic violence model: Nagelkerke R² = 0.05, Hosmer-Lemeshow test P-value = 0.71.

b All models were adjusted for all other variables in the table using a backward conditional selection method. The variance inflation factor (VIF) for all predictors was below 2.5, indicating no substantial multicollinearity. The wide confidence interval for gender in the sexual violence model is likely due to the low number of reported cases in the male group.

Regarding responses to WPV, the most common action was self-defence (29.0%), while 28.5% took no action. The primary reason for not reporting incidents was the belief that reporting would be futile (39.63%).

4. Discussion

4.1. Principal Findings

The data indicate that verbal abuse was the most common form of WPV (80%), followed by physical (24%), ethnic (23.5%), and sexual violence (9%). Regression analysis identified female gender and assignment to emergency departments as significant predictors of physical violence, while a longer internship duration increased the risk of non-physical abuse. A critical finding was the profound underreporting of incidents, with only 28.5% of affected interns formally reporting their experiences.

4.2. Interpretation and Comparison with Literature

Our findings align with global and national studies. Verbal aggression is the most common form of WPV in healthcare environments (3, 9). This pattern is well-established; a 2024 systematic review confirmed verbal abuse as the most prevalent form, with rates as high as 97% (21, 22). In our context, this high prevalence may be linked to the hierarchical hospital culture and the low status of medical interns, who are often targets for frustration from systemic issues like overcrowding. This normalization of verbal abuse indicates a critical institutional failure to ensure a respectful workplace.

The frequency of physical assaults among interns in our study (24%) aligns with rates reported internationally, ranging from 20 - 30% (6, 23, 24). As consistently reported, emergency departments pose the highest risk due to high patient volumes and emotionally charged encounters (8, 25). In southeastern Iran, this risk may be heightened by limited public trust in the health system and the high-stress environment of a resource-limited region.

Although less physically harmful, verbal abuse significantly contributes to psychological exhaustion, burnout, and reduced job satisfaction. These factors are linked to increased medical errors and attrition (16, 17). Therefore, preventive frameworks must target psychological well-being as a core component of institutional support, not just as a remedy.

Sexual harassment affected 9% of respondents, with female interns disproportionately targeted. This mirrors findings from other Iranian studies (13-15) and underscores persistent gender-based power imbalances in medical education (18). Analytically, this is not an isolated issue but a manifestation of patriarchal norms intersecting with institutional hierarchy, leaving female trainees vulnerable without adequate recourse.

Ethnic violence was reported by nearly one-quarter of participants, a relatively underexplored form of WPV in Iran. Given the sociocultural diversity of Sistan and Baluchestan province, these findings highlight the potential role of ethnic tension in hospital dynamics (20, 24). This demands a specific organizational response, including intercultural training and explicit inclusion of ethnic discrimination in anti-violence policies.

Regression analysis revealed that female gender and working in emergency departments predicted physical violence, while longer internship duration increased vulnerability to non-physical abuse. This confirms that risk is not random but structured by identifiable factors, allowing for targeted interventions (6, 12).

Alarmingly, only 28.5% of affected interns formally reported violent incidents. This severe underreporting matches patterns in other Iranian studies (15, 22, 25) and reflects systemic failures globally (26). Common barriers include fear of retaliation, lack of clear reporting systems, and the normalization of violence (27). This underreporting itself is a symptom of the absence of a trusted, effective institutional framework for protection and justice.

4.3. Conclusions

Workplace violence represents a pervasive threat to medical interns in southeastern Iran. Gender, workplace setting, and training duration emerged as key determinants of risk. Institutional and systemic interventions — grounded in global best practices and supported by WHO guidelines — are essential to foster safe, equitable, and supportive clinical learning environments for medical trainees.

4.4. Implications

Our findings emphasize the need for multi-level interventions. We propose a framework that moves beyond generic recommendations: Institutionally, hospitals should establish clear anti-violence policies, confidential reporting mechanisms, and ensure systematic follow-up. This must include specific protocols for gender-based and ethnic violence. Educational reforms should incorporate WPV prevention into undergraduate and internship curricula, focusing on de-escalation and trainee rights (8). At the policy level, alignment with the WHO's Framework Guidelines can provide a comprehensive national framework (2). Furthermore, enhancing psychological support — particularly in high-stress regions like southeastern Iran — can mitigate negative mental health impacts (28).

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Liu J, Gan Y, Jiang H, Li L, Dwyer R, Lu K, et al. Prevalence of workplace violence against healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2019;76(12):927-37. [PubMed ID: 31611310]. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-105849.
  • 2.
    World Health Organization. Framework guidelines for addressing workplace violence in the health sector. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization,; 2002. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9221134466.
  • 3.
    Spector PE, Zhou ZE, Che XX. Nurse exposure to physical and nonphysical violence, bullying, and sexual harassment: a quantitative review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(1):72-84. [PubMed ID: 23433725]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.01.010.
  • 4.
    Aliafsari Mamaghani E, Rahmani A, Hassankhani H, Zamanzadeh V, Dean S, Irajpour A, et al. Iranian nursing students' experiences of workplace violence: a qualitative study. J Inj Violence Res. 2023;15(1):1-9. [PubMed ID: 36335465]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10369335]. https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v15i1.1655.
  • 5.
    Phillips JP. Workplace Violence against Health Care Workers in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(17):1661-9. [PubMed ID: 27119238]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1501998.
  • 6.
    Zhang S, Zhao Z, Zhang H, Zhu Y, Xi Z, Xiang K. Workplace violence against healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30(30):74838-52. [PubMed ID: 37209334]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10199297]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27317-2.
  • 7.
    Lanctot N, Guay S. The aftermath of workplace violence among healthcare workers: A systematic literature review of the consequences. Aggress Violent Behav. 2014;19(5):492-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.010.
  • 8.
    D'Ettorre G, Pellicani V, Mazzotta M, Vullo A. Preventing and managing workplace violence against healthcare workers in Emergency Departments. Acta Biomed. 2018;89(4-S):28-36. [PubMed ID: 29644987]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6357631]. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v89i4-S.7113.
  • 9.
    Rehan ST, Shan M, Shuja SH, Khan Z, Hussain HU, Ochani RK, et al. Workplace violence against healthcare workers in Pakistan; call for action, if not now, then when? A systematic review. Glob Health Action. 2023;16(1):2273623. [PubMed ID: 37938187]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10653705]. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2273623.
  • 10.
    International Labour Office; International Council of Nurses; World Health Organisation; Public Services International. Workplace Violence in the Health Sector - Country Case Study Research Instruments - Survey Questionnaire. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization,; 2003. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/workplace-violence-in-the-health-sector---country-case-study-research-instruments---survey-questionnaire.
  • 11.
    Najafi F, Fallahi-Khoshknab M, Dalvandi A, Ahmadi F, Rahgozar M. [Workplace violence against Iranian nurses: A systematic review]. J Health Promot Manag. 2014;3(2):72-85. FA.
  • 12.
    Gholamreza P, Ramin M, Pegah A. Workplace Violence in Medical Specialty Training Settings in Iran: A Cross-sectional Study. Int J Occup Hyg. 2017;9(1).
  • 13.
    Sahraian A, Hemyari C, Ayatollahi SM, Zomorodian K. Workplace Violence Against Medical Students in Shiraz, Iran. Shiraz E Med J. 2016;17(4-5). https://doi.org/10.17795/semj35754.
  • 14.
    Fallahi Khoshknab M, Oskouie F, Ghazanfari N, Najafi F, Tamizi Z, Afshani S, et al. The Frequency, Contributing and Preventive Factors of Harassment towards Health Professionals in Iran. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2015;3(3):156-64. [PubMed ID: 26171404]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4495323].
  • 15.
    Afkhamzadeh A, Mohamadi Bolbanabad A, Moloudi B, Safari H, Piroozi B. Workplace violence against physicians and medical students in west part of Iran. Int J Human Rights Healthc. 2018;12(2):116-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhrh-07-2018-0049.
  • 16.
    Ramzi ZS, Fatah PW, Dalvandi A. Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Psychol. 2022;13:896156. [PubMed ID: 35712196]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9195416]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896156.
  • 17.
    Liu J, Zheng J, Liu K, Liu X, Wu Y, Wang J, et al. Workplace violence against nurses, job satisfaction, burnout, and patient safety in Chinese hospitals. Nurs Outlook. 2019;67(5):558-66. [PubMed ID: 31202444]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2019.04.006.
  • 18.
    Hawes AM, Gondy K. Sexual Harassment in Medical Education: How We Can Do Better. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(12):3841-3. [PubMed ID: 34145520]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8642565]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06960-w.
  • 19.
    Zeighami M, Mangolian Shahrbabaki P, Dehghan M. Iranian Nurses' Experiences with Sexual Harassment in Workplace: a Qualitative Study. Sex Res Social Policy. 2023;20(2):575-88. [PubMed ID: 35035600]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8748535]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-022-00688-w.
  • 20.
    Asaoka H, Sasaki N, Kuroda R, Tsuno K, Kawakami N. Workplace Bullying and Patient Aggression Related to COVID-19 and its Association with Psychological Distress among Health Care Professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2021;255(4):283-9. [PubMed ID: 34897160]. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.255.283.
  • 21.
    Berger S, Grzonka P, Frei AI, Hunziker S, Baumann SM, Amacher SA, et al. Violence against healthcare professionals in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis of frequency, risk factors, interventions, and preventive measures. Crit Care. 2024;28(1):61. [PubMed ID: 38409034]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10898135]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-04844-z.
  • 22.
    Sadeghi S, Shadman A, Mardi A, Hackett D. Reactions and perspectives of medical students on workplace violence during clinical training in Ardabil, Iran, 2020. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):435. [PubMed ID: 37312134]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10265887]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04426-7.
  • 23.
    Ferri P, Silvestri M, Artoni C, Di Lorenzo R. Workplace violence in different settings and among various health professionals in an Italian general hospital: a cross-sectional study. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2016;9:263-75. [PubMed ID: 27729818]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5042196]. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S114870.
  • 24.
    Alghamdi FA, Alghamdi BM, Alghamdi AA, Alzahrani MA, Qasem BA, Alshehri AA, et al. Interns’ Abuse Across the Healthcare Specialties in Saudi Arabian Hospitals and Its Effects on Their Mental Health. Psychiatry Int. 2025;6(3):89. https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint6030089.
  • 25.
    Copeland D, Henry M. Workplace Violence and Perceptions of Safety Among Emergency Department Staff Members: Experiences, Expectations, Tolerance, Reporting, and Recommendations. J Trauma Nurs. 2017;24(2):65-77. [PubMed ID: 28272178]. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000269.
  • 26.
    Arnetz JE, Hamblin L, Ager J, Luborsky M, Upfal MJ, Russell J, et al. Underreporting of Workplace Violence: Comparison of Self-Report and Actual Documentation of Hospital Incidents. Workplace Health Saf. 2015;63(5):200-10. [PubMed ID: 26002854]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5006066]. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079915574684.
  • 27.
    Arnetz J, Hamblin LE, Sudan S, Arnetz B. Organizational Determinants of Workplace Violence Against Hospital Workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2018;60(8):693-9. [PubMed ID: 29668528]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6086761]. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001345.
  • 28.
    Sargolzaei N, Mohebi MD, Hosaini SS, Farzad Z. Psychological Health and Social Support in Patients with HIV/AIDS in South-East Iran During Year 2016. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2018;In Press(In Press). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijhrba.67472.

Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles