TB, a systemic disease with various presentations and manifestations, is the most common cause of infectious diseases-related mortality worldwide. Classic clinical features associated with active PTB include: cough, weight loss, anorexia, fever, night sweats, and sometimes hemoptysis. TB chemoprophylaxis is a therapeutic measure to avoid development of the disease in individuals already infected with TB. Isoniazid is the most commonly used therapy and follow-up should be at least twice a month until the treatment is complete (
1-
7,
9). However, the use of RIF and pyrazinamide (PZA) has recently been introduced (
9,
10). The effectiveness of INH usage, 5 mg/kg (maximum 300 mg/day) in chemoprophylaxis, has been established since 1960s (
2-
7,
10). Moreover, poor compliance with the treatment due to its long duration (6-12 months) and on the other hand, the occurrence of co-infection with HIV/AIDS and TB infection have stimulated studies on the effectiveness of chemoprophylaxis using other drugs such as PZA or combination of INH and RIF. In 2000, it was recommended to use a two-month course of RIF and PZA or combination of INH and RIF as a substitute for INH. These findings were based on clinical trials and experiments on animals (
9,
10). Isoniazid prophylaxis significantly reduced mortality in children with HIV who were living in an area with a high prevalence of TB (
11). The results of the study by Madhi revealed that isoniazid prophylaxis reduced mortality and the incidence of TB by 54% and 79%, respectively, in children infected with HIV (
11). Chemoprophylaxis in adults with HIV has been significantly effective only in those with positive results of tuberculin skin test, reducing the risk of active TB by about 60% (
12,
13). Recently, it has been observed that treatment for latent TB with isoniazid (but not RIF) improved the immune response, resulting in an increase in the number of interferon γ-producing T cells within a month of therapy (
13). Therefore, isoniazid prophylaxis, by enhancing the host immune response, can produce a persistent protection. In our study, firstly, two children with close contact were evaluated for active TB, and then received isoniazid prophylaxis. However, despite chemoprophylaxis consumption, they acquired the active disease. There is a question: why did they get involved? They had been receiving chemoprophylaxis at the time of diagnosis of TB in their mother and on the other hand, they used the drug on time with a proper dosage. It did not seem that the microorganism was resistant to INH because their mother responded to the treatment. Although, we can say that
M. tuberculosis was resistance to INH and the mother responded to the other three drugs. We could not test the sensitivity of microorganism and resolve this question. On the other hand, they refused to check HIV infection or any more evaluation for co-morbidity. The Joint Tuberculosis Committee of the British Thoracic Society, the American Thoracic Society, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recommend preventive therapy for a minimum of six months in patients at increased risk of developing TB, such as recent skin test converters, close contacts of known TB cases, or patients with positive skin tests and chronic medical conditions (
1,
7,
14). Although isoniazid chemoprophylaxis is a therapeutic measure to avoid development of the disease, this drug dosage did not completely prevent from developing TB. Therefore, we should observe and evaluate all the cases that have a history of close contact with smear positive PTB and use isoniazid prophylaxis.