Severe stenosis of branched pulmonary arteries can cause various complications, including an increase in right ventricular pressure, leading to higher myocardial oxygen demands and, subsequently, myocardial hypertrophy, heart failure, and cardiac dysfunction. So, it is essential to control right ventricular pressure in patients with pulmonary artery stenosis.
Pulmonary artery stenosis is classified as either central (with types 1 and 2) or peripheral (type 3, i.e., the involvement of the proximal part of pulmonary arteries; type 4, with the involvement of the proximal part of segmental arteries, and type 5 with the involvement of the terminal part of segmental arteries) disease. Over the past several years, transcatheter implantation has evolved as a safe and reliable treatment for type 3 branch pulmonary artery stenosis (
15-
17). Two major methods of catheter insertion include BA and SI, with respective success ranges of 53 - 74% and 75 - 86% (
17,
18).
In this cross-sectional study, we followed 40 patients with type 3 branch pulmonary stenosis undergoing therapeutic cardiac catheterization (by either BA or SI) for 2 years after the procedure. We found a significant decrease in pulmonary artery pressure gradient immediately after the procedure in both BA and SI groups, which was in accordance with a study conducted by Hiremath et al., who reported a significant decrease in the peak pressure gradient across the stenotic proximal pulmonary artery in 20 patients with unilateral branch pulmonary artery stenosis treated by BA and SI (P = 0.001) (
4). The recent research was a multi-center prospective cohort study on patients with biventricular circulation, where the researchers observed 78% angiographic improvement in the diameter of stenotic vessels and a significant decrease in the peak instantaneous pressure gradient across stenotic vessels evidenced by trans-thoracic echocardiography early after catheterization. Finally, they recommended both methods to be similarly effective in managing this type of stenosis.
Geggle et al., in a cohort study on 25 patients with Williams syndrome and peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis, declared successful initial pulmonary artery dilation and a 51% success rate after BA in their patients, who had a mean age of 1.5 years and a mean weight of 9.5 kg, while they expected that serial dilation might be required to resolve stenosis (
7). Cunningham et al. (
6), in a study to assess the effect of branch pulmonary artery balloon angioplasty on 69 patients with severe isolated pulmonary artery stenosis, reported that the RV/aortic pressure ratio decreased by ≥ 0.3 in 20 patients (31%) and either increased or decreased by ≤ 0.1 in 24 patients (38%). A recent study was conducted on patients with age of ≤ 5 years old, in which those with higher RV-aortic pressure gradient ratios had better outcomes (
6).
Nowadays, low-profile new-generation stents have been manufactured, which can be used in children and for redilation up to the diameter of adult vessels. These stents pass through the lower French delivery systems and do not slip or move easily on the balloon when passing through the sheath, and their insertion is safer than previous stents. Therefore, stenosis in underweight patients, which was previously only resolvable by using a balloon, can nowadays be treated with these stents; however, they must be redilated with body growth (
18).
According to
Figure 2, residual stenosis in patients undergoing BA continuously decreased for up to six months, then gradually increased but did not reach the previous stenotic level. Our study showed that patients weighing lower than 10 kg in the BA group had better outcomes in comparison with their peers weighing over 10 kg. Although 3 children with weight < 10 kg developed moderate to severe restenosis requiring a second balloon angioplasty, their 2-year follow-up showed less restenosis compared to patients weighing > 10 kg (P = 0.049).
Re-stenosis following BA has been reported in 25 - 35% of infants, which is twice as much as the rate observed in our study. As some studies have reported, the best outcomes following BA are seen in patients with discrete stenosis; however, our patients who required a second balloon dilation suffered from long-segment stenosis. Cutting balloons can be used especially for treating long-segment stenoses, and BA results improved from about 50 - 60% success when using standard balloons to about 80 % with cutting balloons. The use of cutting balloons is indicated when stenosis is not resolvable using standard balloons and may be associated with adverse effects such as tearing of the vessel, bleeding, and mortality. The largest available diameter of cutting balloons is 8 mm, limiting its utilization to vessels with a diameter of less than 8 mm.
In our study, the rate of restenosis was lower in the SI group during the one-year follow-up, but stent stenosis increased afterward, which might be due to an increase in the body surface area in comparison with stent lumen diameter or/and neointimal proliferation. This highlights the need for long-term follow-up and further research to fully understand the durability of stent therapy in pediatric patients with pulmonary artery stenosis.
5.1. Limitations
Although our sample size was similar to previous studies, it is recommended to conduct multicenter studies and meta-analyses with larger numbers of patients to achieve more valid results. Long-term follow-up of patients can further illuminate the durability of using balloons and stents, especially among patients weighing less than 10 Kg with discrete stenosis.
5.2. Conclusions
Balloon angioplasty had an immediate success rate as stent implantation in children with branch pulmonary artery stenosis, especially in those with weights less than 10 kg.
Considering that the use of stents in patients weighing less than 10 kg will definitely require several re-dilations in the coming years, it may be recommended to use BA in patients with discrete stenosis and SI in the case of stenosis recurrence.