It is believed that the rate of recurrent inguinal hernias in children is relatively low (
9). The incidence in different countries is different, depending on patient selection, surgical skill, and surgical methods. Bisgaard et al. reported an incidence of 0.3% for recurrent pediatric inguinal hernia with 1-year follow-up, while Chin et al. reported an incidence of 1.23% in a series of 3,881 patients in Taiwan (
10,
11). In our study, the total recurrent rate was about 1%, which was similar to previous studies. The male-to-female ratio was 12.5:1, with 45.1% right, 33.6% left, and 21.3% bilateral hernias at the first operation. The current series showed a male-to-female ratio of roughly 5:1 (
12). The ratio of male to female of recurrent hernia in our study was much higher than the male-to-female incidence ratio in pediatric inguinal hernia. This is due to the risk of anatomical complexity in male patients that could cause disruption of testicular vascularization and the vas deferens (
13). Laterality at the first operation was not an independent factor for recurrence. What factors can lead to recurrence of pediatric inguinal hernia? First, children’s own health status is an important risk factor for hernia recurrence. Patients younger than 1 year at the first operation are more likely to experience recurrence (
14). Similar observations were shown in our current study. Factors such as prematurity and sustained high abdominal pressure, often due to coughing, constipation, or diarrhea, are also considered risks (
15,
16). In addition, certain conditions, including connective tissue disorders like Marfan's and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, as well as cloacal exstrophy and bladder exstrophy, elevate the risk of recurrent inguinal hernia (
9). Those with recurrent incarcerations or anatomical characteristics like a large hernia sac and a wide inner orifice are also vulnerable to relapse (
17). Second, the recurrence rate is closely related to the surgical methods. An analysis of recent literature, which included 90 pertinent studies on pediatric inguinal hernia, found significant variations in recurrence rates post-repair, ranging from 0 to 6% for open repair and 0 to 5.5% for laparoscopic repair (
18). Furthermore, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has become popular, and the two laparoscopic approaches include intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches (
19). Shalaby et al. observed that the recurrence rates were 4% for intraperitoneal and 1.3% for extraperitoneal procedures, showing no significant variation (
20). Finally, the skill of the surgeon is also an important factor for hernia recurrence. A good pediatric surgeon can select an appropriate method according to the patient’s situation instead of blindly opting for laparoscopic surgery. Surveys conducted recently show that 83 - 87% of pediatric surgeons in Europe and the U.S. still support open repair (
21,
22). For an experienced surgeon, any intraoperative maneuver that can minimize trauma and avoid complications such as bleeding and scrotal hematoma is very important. One study reported that an experienced surgeon can achieve a 50% lower recurrence rate than a less experienced surgeon (
23). Our study showed the median time from first repair to recurrence was 6 months in our series, with 8 months in the open surgery group and 4 months in the laparoscopic approach group. Grimsby et al. (
24) and Shalaby et al. (
20) reported that the time from the first repair to recurrence detection is approximately 3.6 to 6 months. One patient who underwent laparoscopic surgery relapsed only a week after surgery. There may be suspicions of technical errors, like loosening of the previous ligation. For most pediatric surgeons, open surgery is the preferred approach for the treatment of recurrent hernia, especially one that is associated with incarceration, ascended testis, and sliding hernia. Additionally, redo laparoscopic surgery proves to be both practical and efficient for managing recurrent inguinal hernia, no matter whether the initial operation was open or laparoscopic. We performed open surgery for the first time and laparoscopic surgery for the second time in some cases, while laparoscopic surgery was performed for the first time and open surgery for the second time in other cases. Mostly, it is determined by the surgeon’s experience. Generally speaking, when the size of the external ring cannot be entered by the index finger, simple high ligation of the hernia sac is effective. Conversely, for children whose external ring is larger than the index finger, traditional open surgery requires additional strengthening of the inguinal canal wall using a classic Ferguson’s open repair, while laparoscopic surgery requires additional medial umbilical fold covering and strengthening repair. In our study, the postoperative complications of reoperation comprised two scrotal hematomas, which subsided with conservative treatment. No re-recurrence was observed during a mean follow-up period of 20.3 months (range: 3 months to 3 years). There were some constraints in this study. Initially, it was a retrospective observational study carried out in one center with limited follow-up. The actual recurrence rate was difficult to ascertain because it required long-term follow-up. Second, some possible clinical risk factors such as surgical instruments and sutures could not be included in this study. This may also have something to do with recurrence. We also did not deeply compare the effects of open surgery and laparoscopic surgery on recurrence. Multivariate analysis or stratified analysis may need to be done in the future.