2.1. Subjects
A total of 188 children with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who visited the ophthalmology outpatient department of Xi’an Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Xi’an Jiaotong University from October 2021 to January 2025 were enrolled. They were assigned to three groups according to the results of retinal examination: no diabetic retinopathy (no-DR) group (32 cases), nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) group (75 cases), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) group (81 cases). Additionally, 30 healthy children who underwent physical examination during the same period were included as the controls.
Ethical approval for this trial was granted by the Xi’an Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Xi’an Jiaotong University ethics committee, and this trial complied with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Regarding informed consent, this study is a retrospective observational investigation. All data were obtained from routine clinical records and health examination archives. All patient identifiers (such as name, ID number, medical record number, etc.) have been anonymized. The study did not involve any additional invasive procedures or risks of privacy disclosure. According to the approval from the Ethics Committee, written informed consent from the guardians was waived for this type of research utilizing anonymized routine clinical data.
Inclusion criteria: (1) Age 6 - 18 years, any gender, and ability to cooperate with ophthalmic examinations (e.g., lying still for color Doppler ultrasound, undergoing dilated fundus examination); (2) Diagnosis of T2DM meeting the criteria from the Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents (2020 Edition): fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, or 2-hour plasma glucose during an oral glucose tolerance test ≥ 11.1 mmol/L, or random plasma glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L accompanied by classic symptoms of DM (polyuria, polydipsia, weight loss), with a disease duration ≥ 1 year (excluding newly diagnosed cases without stable control); (3) Absence of severe systemic diseases: such as congenital heart disease (including atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect), chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m²), liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class B or higher), hyper/hypothyroidism (uncontrolled, thyroid function indices exceeding 20% of the normal reference range); (4) No other ocular diseases affecting retinal or ocular artery blood flow: such as primary open/closed-angle glaucoma (intraocular pressure > 21 mmHg and cup-to-disc ratio > 0.6), central retinal vein/artery occlusion (previous medical history or imaging evidence), uveitis (acute episode within the past 6 months); (5) No use of medications affecting vascular function or inflammatory status within the past 3 months: such as corticosteroids (oral, intravenous, or periocular injection, continuous use exceeding 7 days), vasoactive drugs (e.g., calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, without stable dosing), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (continuous use exceeding 14 days).
Exclusion criteria: (1) DM-type mismatch: type 1 DM (positive pancreatic autoantibodies, such as anti-insulin antibody or anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody), or specific types of DM (e.g., MODY syndrome, cystic fibrosis-related DM); (2) Poorly controlled systemic diseases: uncontrolled hypertension (systolic/diastolic blood pressure persistently exceeding the 95th percentile for age and gender), autoimmune diseases (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, in active phase), malignant tumors (previous history or current treatment), or severe infections (e.g., sepsis, pneumonia, with hospitalization history within the past month); (3) Ocular structural or functional abnormalities: history of ocular surgery (e.g., cataract extraction, strabismus correction, within the past year) or ocular trauma (e.g., ocular contusion, penetrating injury, affecting the fundus or ocular artery); (4) Factors interfering with fundus examination: moderate or greater opacities of refractive media (e.g., cataract with lens opacity affecting fundus observation; vitreous hemorrhage obscuring retinal details); (5) Insufficient data completeness: inability to complete all required tests (e.g., failed hemodynamic parameter measurements due to poor patient cooperation) or missing key clinical data (e.g., previous blood glucose monitoring records, documentation of DM duration).
Rationale for sample size calculation: based on preliminary pilot study results (a mean difference in ocular artery RI of approximately 0.12 between the no-DR group and the PDR group, with a standard deviation of 0.08), sample size estimation was performed using PASS 15.0. With parameters set at α = 0.05 (two-tailed test) and power (1-β) = 0.90, the calculation indicated a minimum requirement of 28 subjects per group. Accounting for potential follow-up attrition and data incompleteness, the actual sample size per group was increased by 15%-20%. The final determined sample sizes were: control group (n=30), no-DR group (n=32), NPDR group (n=75), and PDR group (n=81), ensuring sufficient statistical power for detecting intergroup differences and mitigating potential bias from sampling variability.
2.2. Hemodynamic Detection
Between October 2021 and January 2025, ocular artery hemodynamic parameters were measured in the ophthalmology ultrasound examination room of Xi’an Children’s Hospital affiliated to Xi’an Jiaotong University using a Mindray DC-8 color Doppler ultrasound diagnostic system (Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd.). Prior to examination, children were guided to an adjacent quiet rest area (equipped with comfortable recliners and soft ambient lighting) to rest for 10 minutes, allowing their heart rate and blood pressure to stabilize and avoiding interference from activity or emotional excitement. Subsequently, the children assumed a supine position with their heads naturally relaxed and eyes gently closed. The ultrasound technician, wearing disposable medical gloves, lightly placed the probe (frequency 7.5 - 10 MHz, set to the ocular examination mode) on the center of the child’s eyelid, strictly controlling the probe pressure (to the level where the child felt no significant foreign body sensation) to prevent elevated intraocular pressure caused by eyeball compression, which could affect the accuracy of hemodynamic measurements. During the examination, the technician adjusted the probe angle and depth to clearly display the long-axis section of the ocular artery (from the optic canal opening to the posterior pole of the eyeball), seFqlecting a segment with clear vascular lumen and continuous, stable blood flow signals as the measurement sampling point, ensuring the sample volume (1 - 2 mm) completely covered the vascular lumen without extending beyond the vessel wall.
The examination environment was strictly controlled: room temperature was maintained at 22 - 25°C, lighting was kept soft (avoiding direct strong light on the instrument screen), and noise was controlled below 40 decibels to prevent external interference from affecting patient cooperation and signal stability. The measured parameters included: (1) Peak systolic velocity (PSV, unit: cm/s): the maximum blood flow velocity during cardiac systole; (2) EDV(unit: cm/s): the minimum blood flow velocity at the end of cardiac diastole; (3) Resistance index (RI): calculated using the equation (PSV - EDV)/PSV; (4) PI: calculated using the formula (PSV - EDV)/mean velocity (where mean velocity was automatically calculated by the instrument’s built-in algorithm as the time-averaged maximum velocity over one cardiac cycle).
Each eye was measured three times at 1-minute intervals to minimize the impact of transient blood flow fluctuations. After excluding data with significant signal interference (such as artifacts caused by eyelid tremor), the average of three valid measurements was taken as the final value for each parameter. All examinations were conducted between 8:00 and 11:00 daily to avoid the influence of circadian rhythms (e.g., morning peaks in sympathetic nerve activity) on hemodynamic parameters. Furthermore, all measurements were performed by the same experienced ultrasonographer (with eight years of clinical experience in ocular color Doppler imaging and holding national certification in ultrasound medicine) to ensure standardized procedures and data accuracy.
2.3. Serum Cytokine Detection
The levels of VEGF, TNF-α, IL-6, and TGF-β in fasting serum were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 5 mL of venous blood was collected from the elbow in the early morning, centrifuged at 3,000 r/min for 15 minutes to separate the serum, and stored at -80°C. The corresponding ELISA kits (Yilaisa Biotech Co., Ltd., Jiangsu, China) were used strictly based on the guidance. Absorbance measurements were performed at 450 nm, with subsequent concentration determination based on the established standard curve. Each sample was tested in duplicate, and the average value was taken. The intra-batch and inter-batch variation coefficients were controlled at < 10% and < 15%, respectively, to ensure the quality of detection.
2.4. Collection of Clinical Data
Basic information of all children included: (1) Demographic characteristics: age, gender, height, weight, and Body Mass Index (BMI) calculation; (2) DM-related indicators: duration of DM, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and insulin usage. All data were collected and entered by a dedicated person using a unified form to ensure data integrity and accuracy. Missing data were supplemented by rechecking medical records or contacting the children’s families. A double-check system was used during data collection to ensure data quality.
2.5. Statistical Processing
SPSS 26.0 was employed. Measurement data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Normally distributed data were presented as mean ± SD, and one-way ANOVA and least significant difference t test were adopted for contrast. Non-normally distributed data were presented as median (interquartile range) [M (P25, P75)] and assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis H test. Count data were presented as number (percentage) and assessed using the χ² test or Fisher’s exact test. Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis was adopted to assess the correlation between ophthalmic artery hemodynamic parameters and serum cytokine levels. A multiple linear regression model was established to analyze the main factors affecting hemodynamic parameters. All statistical tests were two-sided, with P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Covariate adjustment analysis was conducted. To control for the potential confounding effects of BMI, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and DM duration on hemodynamic parameters (PSV, EDV, RI, PI) and serum cytokines (VEGF, TNF-α, IL-6, TGF-β), multiple linear regression models were employed for adjustment. Each hemodynamic parameter or cytokine served as the dependent variable, while BMI, HbA1c, and DM duration were included as independent variables. After controlling for these confounders, intergroup differences in the indicators and correlations between indicators were re-analyzed to ensure the robustness of the results.