The Holy Qur’an discusses pregnancy, breastfeeding and its related issues in four verses including verse 233 of Surah
Baqarah, verse 6 of Surah T
alaq, verse 15 of Surah
Ahqaf and verse 14 of Surah
Luqman (
40) among which verse 233 of Surah
Baqarah is the most important verse in breast milk and is known as
Erda’ (suckling) verse (
41).
In verse 233 of Surah Baqarah, Allah states that:
“Mothers shall suckle their children for two whole years; (that is) for those who wish to complete the suckling. The duty of feeding and clothing nursing mothers in a seemly manner is upon the father of the child. No one should be charged beyond his capacity. A mother should not be made to suffer because of her child, nor should he to whom the child is born (be made to suffer) because of his child. And on the (father’s) heir is incumbent the like of that (which was incumbent on the father). If they want to wean the child on mutual consent and (after) consultation, it is no sin for them; and if ye wish to give your children out to nurse, it is no sin for you, provided that ye pay what is due from you in kindness. Observe your duty to Allah, and know that Allah is Seer of what ye do (
42).”
This verse contains several issues that are respectively as follows: two complete years of breastfeeding children, financing divorced mothers in breastfeeding period, the appropriateness of obligations with human’s capabilities, prohibition of father from making trouble to the mother, prohibition of mother from making trouble to the father and prohibition of both of them from making trouble to the child, the obligations of father’s heir in financing the mother, permission of weaning by consultation and the consent of parents, the permission to give the child to a wet nurse by taking into consideration her financial rights, the necessity to observe piety and God being aware of human beings’ deeds (
43) which seems that it is due to the importance of breastfeeding issue.
This verse which is about the decree of mothers’ breastfeeding, begins with the word “
Al-waledat” (mothers) that differs from the word “
ommahat” (mothers) because “
om” refers to mediated mothers, grandmothers (
44,
45) and everyone who is at the mothers’ place, however,
waledah (mother) means mother who has given birth to a child (
15) and perhaps the use of the word (
waledah) is one of the wonderful points in Holy Quran that includes women receiving embryos and the owners of surrogacy and involves breastfeeding of infants with their borrowed milk, although they are not considered as the child’s real mother (
41). Moreover, the use of “
al” in the word that is plural itself means generalizability of the decree to the majority under that issue and includes specifically everyone that “
waledeh” applies to them (
41) in fact, the plural leading to A and L implies the commonality that God does not bring qualifiers after it so that the verse could be referred to a specific group of mothers (
43) and the word “
waledat” itself in its literal meaning has a general conceptual meaning which includes all mothers whether they have husbands or they are separated from their husbands (
43,
44,
46,
47). Of course, some scholars state that since this verse comes after the verses related to the divorced women, the breastfeeding decree of this verse is related to the divorced women, however, the word
wa (and) before
wāledāt that is considered as both turning and an appeal demonstrates that the verse in terms of juridical decree states a new decree entitled
Erda’ in comparison with the previous verse, however, it refers to the previous verse (
41). The use of the verb “
yorde’na” after the word
waledat suggests sucking milk from the breast of mother (
41) and since waledat give birth to their children, they breastfeed them as a result of instinctive and natural affection (
45) so it seems that the audience of the verse is about the breastfeeding decree of all the mothers who give birth to the children.
“
Yorde’na” is apparently in the present tense, but in fact it is “command and drafting or imperative” (
45,
46) meaning that “mothers must breastfeed their children” (
46-
49). A group of commentators consider it as an emphatic imperative (
48) and other groups of commentators consider it as a recommended imperative (
46). Moreover, the beginning of the sentence as a nominal sentence is unlike the Arab tradition (basically the sentences start as a verbal sentence) is also indicative of emphasis (
41). Then the word “
awladahonna” (their children) was used, this word is attributed to mothers and it mentions that the child belongs to the mother (
44) and by using the word “
honna” (they for female) it leads to incitement of moral conscience of mothers to their children so as to create a more psychological effect in doing maternal task (
41) and states that mothers must breastfeed their children (
43). On the other hand, there is no doubt that the verb “
yorde’na” in verse could not be a statement meaning that “mothers are breastfeeding their children two complete years” because there are mothers who do not do this task, so such news will not always be true and since a lie is not valid in the word of God, therefore, the purpose of using this word and as a result the purpose of using this sentence “
alwaledat yarde’na awladahonna” has another meaning (
48) that in interpretive and jurisprudence sources, three different opinions have been proposed for the meaning of this sentence (
43):
1) The necessity of breastfeeding: Since the informative statement in addition to the meaning of news can mean hope and demand (
46,
47), in this case the verb
yorde’na means necessity and the emphatic imperative and demanding duty and action that mothers must breastfeed their children for two complete years (
43,
48), particularly in certain circumstances that the child only feeds on mother’s breast or a wet nurse cannot be found or the father is not capable of financing a wet nurse, breastfeeding children for two complete years by mothers will be a necessary action (
49).
2) Recommendation of breastfeeding: If the informative statement implies hope and there is no contrast, it is indicative of necessity, whereas in this verse in other parts of it sentences such as
“leman arada an yotemma ar reda’a”, “ala al-mawlude lahu rezqahonna wa keswatahonna...”, “latodarra waledatan be waladeha” (it is forbidden to cause to sustain a loss to a mother on behalf of her child, and “
wa en aradtom an tastarde’u” (if you want to employ a foster-mother) state a non-obligatory evidence, while there is an external evidence such as the absence of coercion of mothers to breastfeed that leads to a recommendation of breastfeeding (
43), and according to the fact that breastfeeding happens when the father wants (
48), therefore the decree in the verse is a kind of recommendation (
46) which is used to mean that breastfeeding is mother’s right and it cannot be taken from the mother or it is also used to indicate the priority of the mother in breastfeeding baby to other women (
43,
44).
3) The priority of the mother in breastfeeding: breastfeeding for two years is the mother’s duty and this right must be respected by the father and the father should not take the child from the mother and not give the child to another woman, unless the mother asks for more money than others for breast milking (
43,
46,
49).
After breastfeeding decree, the pious legislator refers to its duration by using the word “
hawlayn” which states that the duration of breastfeeding is two complete years and by using the adjective ‘full’ rejects tolerance in two years and asks mothers to breastfeed their children for two complete years (
43). The pious legislator has used the word “
hawl” instead of “
sanah” which is more common among Arabs so that it could be appropriate from a timer perspective for change, breast-fed baby’s weakness, and also fulfillment of momentary maternal duty (
43) and
hawlayne kamelayn shows that breastfeeding is effective developmentally to infrastructure children’s physical and mental health for two complete years (
41) and in verse 14 of Surah
Luqman it has also been emphasized (
43).
After the announcement of breastfeeding duration with the statement “
leman arada an yotemma ar reḍā’a” the decree is related to those who wish to complete breastfeeding period (
43). A group of commentators expressed the reason to complete breastfeeding, according to verse 15 of Surah
Ahqaf which states that the duration of carrying the baby and breastfeeding is 30 months (
43) and the required time for breastfeeding of mature infants is 21 months and the required time for breastfeeding of a 6 month premature infant is 24 months to compensate for the shortcomings of short-term carrying period by completing breastfeeding period (
50) therefore, according to the aforementioned verse and this verse the duration of less than 21 months in breastfeeding is considered cruelty to a child (
41) and 21 months is obligatory and from 21 months to 24 months is recommended (
43). In fact, the audience of this verse “
leman arada an yotemma ar reda’a” can be both the father and the mother so that they notice that the child must be breastfed for two years, and even in a dispute between father and mother or separation of parents, the father should not separate the child from the mother (
43), and he should not take the two year-breastfeeding right from the mother (
44). Also, in the next sentences it has been referred to the rule of “no harming” by using the verb “
latadaru” based on the fact that the father and the mother should not harm each other and the child by taking the child from the mother and opposition with mother’s breastfeeding or the divorced mother by asking for more money to breastfeed the child (
43-
46,
49,
51,
52) and by using the word “
la” in “
latadaru” in the mode of
Mofa’ele (participatory), all harms have been forbidden (
44), because the harm from the mother is intentional while the harm to the baby is forcible (
41). Hence, quitting breastfeeding by the mother is cruelty to the child which is rationally obscene and religiously prohibited (
41).
In this verse the expenditure of divorced woman in the breastfeeding days is the father’s and the his heir’s responsibility which also implies that breastfeeding is obligatory on women because if breastfeeding was something desirable, it was not necessary for the father to provide its costs (
43), especially by using the word “
mawlude lah” the duty of financing the mother in breastfeeding period is the responsibility of the father according to the legislative decree (
44) which is to the known and affordable extent (
43).
After mentioning the mother’s right and the child’s right by stating the sentence “
faen arada fesala” (if they want to stop sucking) it explains the weaning procedure that should be according to the father’s and mother’s compromise, agreement, and consultation with each other (
41,
43) and consultation with professionals such as physicians (
50). Since
fesal is based on two proviso of compromise and consultation which includes the woman’s consent, therefore, breastfeeding child in the first two years of life is the mother’s right and if the mother does not ask for more money, the father will not have the right to separate the child from the mother till the completion of the breastfeeding period. According to Allameh Tabatabai, the use of the word “
fesal” is the evidence of non-obligatory custody and of non-obligatory woman’s breastfeeding but they are the rights that woman can use or give up (
44). Some commentators also suggest that the word
fesal indicates being discharged (not giving up), that is, if the mother becomes sick during breastfeeding or hardship situations arise, in that case they can use alternative nutrition and preferably take a wet nurse by consulting with experts and knowing the parties’ consent which is a rational process (
41).
The verse ends with the expression “
wa taqwa… wa a’lamu an ...” which represents emphasis and simultaneously it represents a threat to show the importance of the aforementioned issue in the verse that is the very breastfeeding issue, which implies an obligation (
41).
What is obtained from the content of the verse based on the valid interpretive sources as described above implies that according to some jurists (unpopular theory) breastfeeding is an affair that is the duty of all mothers (birth mothers) and its necessity is not a reason to force mothers to do this affair, as in the rest of the acts of coercion it is not permissible to force somebody to do an obligatory act and it is important that people voluntarily perform their duties. On the other hand, some other jurists (popular theory) believe that breastfeeding is not a necessary affair and it is recommended; this is a sign of mother’s and the child’s right in breastfeeding and both groups believe in mother’s priority for breastfeeding the child (
43).
Since surrogacy and the resulting baby can take advantage of the content of this verse based on having the right to breastfeed, completion of breastfeeding period (less than 21 months is cruelty to the child), no harm from the mother and the father to the child, providing the mother’s expenditure during breastfeeding period by the father or his heirs, priority of mother in breastfeeding the child, decision to weaning the child by the consent and the consultation of the parents, but the present situation in our country (Iran) is not clear in these cases.