In the recent years, stem cells therapy as a bridging treatment in idiopathic DCM or in some cases as a rescue treatment has attracted the attention of many researchers and clinicians. In adult population, different methods and results of this solution that generally indicate the feasibility and effectiveness of this treatment have been described, but controversies persist (
14,
15). For the pediatric age group controversies are more, and few clinical experiences, usually in limited case groups, have been reported. Most of these clinical experiences indicate positive results with regard to clinical and in some cases para-clinical finding (
2,
4,
14,
16-
18). This study showed that 62% of the patients have improvement of clinical condition even in inotrope dependent cases. The later finding (improvement in critically ill patients) was seen in early phase of stem cells injection, before the required time for stem cell regeneration and differentiation to cardiac cell. It indicates that bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMMNCs) infusion may improve the cardiac function by cytokine or other biological products in the bone marrow and not directly related to stem cell differentiation or new cardio-myocyte generation (
19). Animal studies and some adult population studies in this area also propose indirect reparative mechanism by paracrine effects (
19-
22). Intracoronary infusion of unselected BMMNC has low retention rates of stem cells in comparison to other techniques such as selected CD34+ or mesenchymal stem cells infusion. This factor decreases the chance of cardiomyogenic differentiation in this technique, as well (
23). Thus, it may be considered in critically ill patients, to benefit from reparative effect of BMMNCs injection as a rescue treatment, as in two of inotrope dependent patients in this study. We recommend further investigation of this finding in a larger randomized clinical trial.
In this study, clinical response was more obvious than echocardiographic changes; this finding has been confirmed in multiple similar studies in adult and pediatric age groups (
2,
6,
7,
9,
17,
24). All patients had shorter hospitalization with improvement of NYHA functional class in 62% of patients. About 13% increase in EF, was more than that in other similar studies; EF changes have had a wide variation in different reports, ranging from 0% to 21%. Usually, randomized clinical trials report fewer changes and more changes is reported by case series or pediatric age group studies (
8,
14,
24,
25). Other M-mode indices had more subtle changes and especially LVEDD had minimum changes in different studies, similar to the non-significant decrease in this study (
8,
14,
24).
GLS showed improvement of strain and strain rate results. Segmental analysis showed most changes in the basal lateral region, but none of the 6 regions in the 4 chamber view had significant statistical changes. To the best of our knowledge, there is no report on pediatric cardiomyopathies that can be compared with our study. However, subtle changes in different regions which are globally increased in all regions may indicate non-dependent coronary territory effect of this treatment. As we mentioned in the results, one of the patients with clinically improved heart failure did not show increased ejection fraction and shortening fraction, while an increase in the global strain and strain rate was seen. It indicated that speckle tracking of these patients may result in more precise para-clinical findings that explain the clinical improvement of these patients. We recommend these patients be followed by speckle tracking echocardiography, and not only by 2D echocardiography.
There are controversies on the method of mononuclear stem cells injection, and some authors believe that trans-endocardial stem cell injection has a higher myocardial cell retention rate with higher success rate in comparison with trans-coronary injection (
2,
25). Although our findings with intracoronary injection method were similar to their results, trans-endocardial injection seems appropriate for local myocardial dysfunction, especially in ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy in which hibernating myocardium (viable but dysfunctional myocardium) is presented and injection can be performed in these areas, precisely after cardiac mapping. In addition, selected BMMNCs, mesenchymal stem cell or cardiac stem cell are more prone to differentiation to the cardiomyogenic cell rather than unselected BMMNCs in different method of injection (
22,
26).
Similar to many other studies, there was no serious complication during the procedure in our study, and this is not a new finding in pediatric or adult age groups (
2,
8,
19). Even critically ill patient in this study could tolerate the procedure. We need more investigation in this area, but based on many other studies in adult and case series in pediatric cases, the risk of these procedures is acceptable for most of the patients and could be considered as rescue treatment in critically ill patients (
2,
9,
11,
26).
5.2. Conclusions
This trial investigated the effect of mononuclear stem cells therapy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. We observed improvement in myocardial function in pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy after intracoronary cell-therapy. The efficacy and safety of this method seems to be acceptable, and the results are promising. Speckle tracking echocardiography is a more precise method to follow the changes in these patients.
Hence, we suggest that mononuclear stem cells injection can be used for stabilization of some patients to defer heart transplantation, especially in inotrope-dependent or end-stage DCM patients.