The prevalence of CD has increased dramatically in the last two decades due to the use of sensitive and specific serological tests and a better understanding of the disease by physicians (
17). Although serological tests for CD are recommended in high-risk groups, the majority of asymptomatic patients are still undiagnosed (
18).
In a systematic review and meta-analysis, the prevalence of biopsy-proven CD was reported to be 0.7% in the general population worldwide (
19).
The prevalence of biopsy-proven CD in type 1 DM has been reported to be 1.6% - 16.4% (
6-
10). As consistent with the literature, the biopsy-proven prevalence of CD in children with type 1 DM was 4.4%.
ESPGHAN and BSGHAN recommend HLA DQ analysis in addition to tTG IgA test as the first-choice screening test in high-risk groups such as type 1 DM. It was suggested that no further examination is necessary for CD in patients with negative findings (
1,
20).
In addition to that, it has been reported that HLA typing was not cost-effective in patients with type 1 DM, as HLA-DQ2 / 8 positivity was detected in approximately 90% of patients (
21,
22). Due to the high cost, HLA typing is often not possible. In our study, we could not perform HLA typing because of the high cost.
It has been reported that approximately 85% of type 1 DM patients diagnosed with CD were asymptomatic in a systematic review and meta-analysis (
23). As compatible with literature, 7 of 12 patients (58.3%) diagnosed with CD are asymtomatic.
In a systematic review, it has been recommended that screening tests for CD should be performed within the first 2 years and 5 years after the diagnosis of type 1 DM, since CD is usually diagnosed within 5 years in type 1 DM patients (
23). As consistent with the literature, 9 of 12 patients diagnosed with CD were diagnosed within the first 5 years after the diagnosis of type 1 DM in our study. Also, four of those patients were diagnosed with CD within 2 years after the diagnosis of DM.
The risk of developing CD is higher in female gender and younger patients diagnosed with DM (
6,
24,
25). As consistent with those studies, 7 of our patients diagnosed with CD were 5 years or younger, but there was male dominance. The reason for this gender difference may be a cross-sectional study.
In a multicenter study including healthy school age children, the prevalence of CD was found to be 0.47% in our country (
26). In the curent study, the prevalence of biopsy-proven CD in children with type 1 DM was found to be 4.4%, which is approximately 9 times higher than in the general population.
It has been reported that patients with undiagnosed CD and DM had worse glycemic control and a higher prevalence of retinopathy and nephropathy (
27,
28). In those patients, 1-year gluten-free diet was found to be safe and had no negative effect on quality of life.
5.1. Limitations
First, two of our patients refused the process of endoscopy because having no symptoms associated with CD. If he had accepted the gastroduodenoscopy, the biopsy-proven prevalence of CD would be higher. Second, HLA-DQ analysis could not be performed to patients due to the high costs of HLA analysis. Third, because CD can be diagnosed at all stages in life, the follow-up period may be short. Therefore, we may have detected a less prevalence of CD than expected.
5.2. Conclusions
We found that the prevalence of biopsy-proven CD in children with type 1 DM was 4.4%, which was approximately 9 times higher than the prevalence of CD in the general population. In the current study, 9 of 12 patients diagnosed with CD were diagnosed within the first 5 years after DM. In addition, 58.3% of our patients with CD were asymptomatic. According to our results, we recommend that screening tests for CD should be performed at least once a year for 5 years in children with Type 1 DM, even if the patients are asymptomatic.