This study, involving 307 patients with IBD, found that 12.80% experienced moderate-to-severe anxiety and 19.20% experienced depression. These prevalence estimates are generally consistent with reports from other populations, although rates vary by geography and the measurement instruments used. Lewis et al. reported anxiety in 30.60% and depression in 40.10% of 242 patients with IBD, underscoring the substantial psychiatric burden in this population (
30). Similarly, a study of 2478 Chinese patients with IBD found that 25.50% and 29.70% met criteria for moderate-to-severe anxiety and depression, respectively (
31). Importantly, multiple studies consistently demonstrate that patients with active disease have higher rates of psychiatric symptoms than those in remission (
21,
32).
Hospitalization and active disease are particularly associated with an elevated psychiatric burden. Patients with IBD who experience anxiety or depression are at greater risk of hospitalization, emergency department visits, readmission, and increased outpatient utilization than those without psychiatric comorbidity (
33,
34). This is further supported by a systematic review and meta-analysis confirming that patients with IBD are more likely to develop anxiety and depression than the general population. Moreover, individuals with a history of depression appear to have an increased risk of subsequently developing IBD, suggesting a potential bidirectional relationship (
35). Consistent with these findings, our study showed that active IBD was significantly associated with higher GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores. However, because of the cross-sectional design, the causal direction cannot be established, which represents an important limitation.
Emerging research highlights the microbiota-gut-brain (MGB) axis as a plausible mechanism linking psychiatric symptoms and IBD activity. Certain gut microbiota are associated with alterations in brain function and depressive symptoms in major depressive disorder (
36), and disruption of gut-brain pathways in IBD may contribute to psychiatric comorbidities through immune, neural, and inflammatory mechanisms (
37). Recognition and management of anxiety and depression remain important for overall patient care and quality of life (
38). However, our cross-sectional design does not permit inference that treating these symptoms would directly reduce IBD activity. Prospective and interventional studies are required to determine causal effects.
Psychiatric comorbidities are associated with a worse clinical course in IBD. Prospective cohort studies have shown that depressive symptoms predict an increased risk of symptomatic relapse and shorter remission intervals and that anxiety symptoms are linked to a higher likelihood of flare, the need for corticosteroids, and escalation of therapy (
39,
40). Depressive symptoms are associated with a higher likelihood of UC and CD exacerbation, whereas anxiety appears to be more strongly associated with flare activity in CD (
41). One potential explanation is that patients with depression may have reduced medication adherence, directly affecting disease control. Additionally, corticosteroid treatment commonly used in IBD can influence mood, further complicating the management of psychiatric symptoms (
42). Psychological distress is associated with an increased likelihood of disease activity in IBD through activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, disruption of intestinal barrier function, alterations in gut microbiota composition, and enhanced mucosal immune and inflammatory signaling (
43). Nevertheless, the presence of these associations does not indicate directionality in our dataset, and reverse causation, whereby disease activity drives psychological symptoms, remains a highly plausible explanation.
Our study also found that, as anxiety severity increased, its correlation with disease activity strengthened in both UC and CD patients, consistent with recent studies demonstrating that higher anxiety and depression scores predict greater clinical disease activity in both UC and CD (
31,
38). In multivariable models, depressive symptoms were associated with a 1.78-fold higher risk of disease exacerbation. These results align with a Swiss study of 2870 patients, which found that elevated depressive symptoms predicted symptomatic relapse using the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index for CD and MTWSI for UC, whereas anxiety predicted relapse in CD (
41). Similarly, a US-based online cohort demonstrated that baseline Patient Health Questionnaire-8 depression scores predicted an increased risk of flare, hospitalization, and surgery over 22 months in patients with CD (
44).
Nevertheless, the cross-sectional design of our study precludes causal inference, leaving the temporal relationship between psychological distress and disease activity unresolved. Active IBD is frequently accompanied by abdominal pain, fatigue, hospitalization, dietary limitations, treatment burden, and other disease-related stressors, all of which may exacerbate anxiety and depressive symptoms. Moreover, factors such as corticosteroid use, biologic therapy, chronic pain, and sleep disturbances may further modulate both psychological distress and disease activity. Consequently, although a robust association was observed, the potential for reverse causation, whereby disease activity drives psychological symptoms, cannot be discounted.
This study has several strengths, including its relatively large and well-characterized cohort, the use of validated psychiatric and clinical indices, and adjustment for a broad range of demographic and clinical confounders, such as age, sex, marital status, education, BMI, smoking, alcohol use, disease duration, family history, and comorbidities. However, the cross-sectional design is a key limitation that precludes causal inference and prevents clarification of whether psychological symptoms precede, accompany, or result from disease activity. Although multiple demographic and clinical factors were adjusted for, some treatment-related variables, such as corticosteroid or biologic therapy, were not consistently available and could not be modeled independently of disease activity. Additional sources of potential residual confounding, such as socioeconomic status, psychiatric history, sleep disorders, and medication adherence, cannot be excluded. Registry-based data may also be subject to occasional entry inconsistencies. Furthermore, psychiatric assessments relied on self-report instruments, and the single regional setting may limit generalizability. In addition, the small number of patients with CD (n = 50) limits the statistical power for subgroup analyses; therefore, all CD-specific findings should be interpreted as exploratory. Collectively, these considerations emphasize the need for multicenter longitudinal studies incorporating objective biomarkers and comprehensive psychiatric evaluation to better establish the directionality of the observed associations.
5.1. Conclusions
This study highlights the intricate interplay between anxiety, depressive symptoms, and disease activity in patients with IBD. The findings demonstrate that anxiety and depressive disorders are markedly more prevalent among patients with active disease than among those in remission, indicating a robust association between psychological distress and clinical disease status. The strong and consistent associations between GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores and IBD activity, even after adjustment for key demographic and clinical variables, underscore the clinical relevance of incorporating psychological assessment into routine IBD management. These associations suggest that patients with elevated psychological distress may be at higher risk of active disease; however, these relationships must be interpreted with caution because of the study design. Early identification and management of anxiety and depression may improve patient well-being, but longitudinal studies are needed to clarify causal pathways.