The case was a 48-year-old married man, with 3 children, a hospital employee who had undergone several previous surgeries after the diagnosis of foreign bodies inside the intestines and leg muscles. He was born in a crowded family with conflictual parenting and poor effective relationship with his siblings except for his younger brother who was committed to helping him get better. The patient was hospitalized in spring 2016 due to a traumatic injury to the left hand’s thumb (pressed by the door), with the potential for finger amputation. A few months after this traumatic event, in July 2016, he referred to the hospital with complaints of abdominal pain and no bowel function and underwent laparotomy and treatment of the possible intestinal obstruction.
Two months after the laparotomy, in September 2016, the patient referred to the hospital again with complaints of abdominal pain, which was investigated by abdominal radiographies and underwent laparotomy surgery due to foreign body in the intestines (3 needles and 5 knitting needles). In March 2017, the patient underwent laparotomy again with the diagnosis of a foreign body (needle and nail inside the intestine). Eight months later, in November 2017, the patient referred to the hospital with a complaint of pain and burning in the right leg’s calf. In the radiographic examination, the presence of a knitting needle in the right leg was diagnosed as the cause of the complaint and he underwent surgery for removal of the foreign body. During the recent year, the patient has been hospitalized repeatedly in a short period of time and therefore, the medical staff suspected that the patient develops symptoms by swallowing knitting needles and nails and pushing needles into his leg’s muscle; thus he was referred to a psychiatrist, although he declared he did not know why a needle existed in these areas and denied it.
By interviewing the patient’s family, it was revealed that the patient complained of a balance disturbance and falling during walking without physical injury about 2 years ago, and by referral to a neurologist and conducting EEG and brain MRI studies, there was no finding in favor of neurological lesion or seizure, and eventually the possibility of conversion disorder was considered for the patient. During this period, the patient suffered from reduced mood, symptoms of depression, and sleep disorder. In psychological examination with the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2(MMPI-II), depression, multiple psychosomatic complaints, self-doubt, immaturity, and dependence were reported. In Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), the patient’s responses were elementary and simple, and he had a little abstract thinking, and most of the responses were related to depression. Rorschach test showed that the patient often had painful emotions, depression, and poor reality testing without psychotic response.
The patient used denial, acting out and suppression defense mechanisms through interviews threatening to leave therapy. No psychosis was found in the investigations. On physical examination, the patient had multiple scars due to abdominal laparotomy as well as scars of surgeries in his legs in which the wounds were infected because of manipulations by the patient (
Figures 1 -
4).
X-ray graph showed nails and needles in GI and the patient’s chest
AP radiography of the patient showed needle in both legs’ calves
Laparotomy scars in the anterior abdomen are seen
The patient’s right leg indicating suture and surgical scars
The patient was born in a crowded family and is currently a hospital staff with depressive disorder; all of these are risk factors of factitious disorder and it is possible that the patient was neglected in his childhood. For the treatment of this patient, in addition to prescribing an antidepressant (fluoxetine 30 mg daily) for the associated depressive disorder, cognitive-behavioral therapy sessions were conducted to enhance coping skills with future stress. His family was reluctant to participate in family education sessions. The only person accompanying the patient during follow-up visits was his younger brother. Proper management of the factitious disorder, although is very difficult, could prevent unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in this patient and reduce the complications of frequent surgeries. A six-month follow-up showed a partial remission in depressive disorder and anxiety relief. However, he has now a favorite function in the work but the patient was unwilling to adhere to the treatment in the last visit. Intervention in his family system may require much more time than usual.