The use of essential oils in traditional medicine has grown over the years, based on their medicinal activities, such as bactericidal, fungicidal, virucidal, anti-inflammatory, antispasmodic effects, among others. Essential oils are derived from aromatic plants and consist of secondary metabolites (
25). A pharmacological property reported in the literature, being used as an alternative in antiparasitic therapy, since the increase of resistant parasites to drugs available in the market, directing for the encouragement of the development of research, by the search for new therapeutic agents (
7,
26).
In the investigation of chemical composition of essential oil
P. tuberculatum (EOPT), 0.34% yield is observed, being possible to identify 98.97% of constituents as shown in
Table 1. Out of these identified compounds, there was emphasis on the β-pinene (27.74%) and α-pinene (26.54%), major compounds.
Among the chemicals already identified in species of
Piper, several terpenes have already been described in the literature (
27). In chemical analysis of essential oil of
Piper aduncum,
Piper amalago,
Piper arboreum,
Piper cernuum,
Piper hispidum,
Piper regnelii,
Piper submarginalum,
Piper vicosanum e
Pothomorphe umbellata, os principais monoterpenos encontrados foram α-pineno, β-pineno, espatulenol, E-cariofileno, óxido de cariofileno, germacreno D e limoneno (
28).
Terpenes identified in EOPT are shown into two types, sesquiterpenes and monoterpenes. The major components are structural isomers, being able to differentiate toxicity and types of biological activity (
29). Besides them, it was also detected β-caryophyllene, β-ocimene, myrcene, limonene and other constituents in minor amounts.
| Components | (%) | TR (min) | Kovats indices |
|---|
| α-pinene | 26.54 | 12.54 | 939 |
| Sabinene | 2.65 | 14.67 | 976 |
| β-pinene | 27.74 | 14.94 | 980 |
| Myrcene | 1.55 | 15.53 | 991 |
| Limonene | 3.02 | 17.86 | 1031 |
| 1,8-cineole | 1.41 | 18.05 | 991 |
| β–ocimene | 12.45 | 18.92 | 1040 |
| α-terpineol | 0.81 | 27.70 | 1189 |
| α-copaene | 1.29 | 38.55 | 1376 |
| β-caryophyllene | 14.38 | 41.13 | 1418 |
| α-humulene | 1.26 | 43.22 | 1455 |
| Germacrene D | 1.09 | 45.10 | 1480 |
| Nerolidol | 0.94 | 47.37 | 1534 |
| Spathulenol | 1.02 | 47.86 | 1576 |
| Caryophyllene oxide | 2.82 | 47.97 | 1581 |
| Drug | Concentration (µg/mL) | Cytotoxicity activity
| Antiparasitic activity
| |
|---|
| %CTF | LC50(µg/mL) | T. cruzi(%AE) | EC50(µg/mL) | L. infantum(%AP) | EC50(µg/mL) | L. braziliensis(%AP) | EC50(µg/mL) |
|---|
| EOPT | 1000 | 100 | 204.71 | 70.00 | 140.31 | 100 | 133.97 | 100 | 143,59 |
| 500 | 98.19 | 70.00 | 100 | 86.53 |
| 250 | 82.17 | 70.41 | 100 | 71.70 |
| 125 | 1.75 | 52.96 | 50.50 | 51.01 |
| NIFU | 1 | - | - | 54.9 | 0.91 | - | - | - | - |
| 0,5 | - | 45.6 | - | - |
| PENTA | 6.25 | - | - | - | - | 54.2 | 5.69 | - | - |
| 3.125 | - | - | 15.5 | - |
| METRO | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 100 | 0.51 |
| 1 | - | - | - | 97.9 |
As their antiparasitic activity, EOPT caused death percentage of > 87% against the parasitic forms of
L. infantum of the studied concentrations. Before the promastigote variation of
L. infantum in the concentration of 125 μg/mL, it caused the death of 50.5% of parasites. The anti-promastigote percentage against
L. braziliensis was > 77% in the tested concentrations. Furthermore, EOPT in the 125 μg/mL concentration caused a parasite death of 51%. Against
T. cruzi, the essential oil had, overall, an activity of 65% where the 125 μg/mL concentration was effective in producing inhibition of 52.9% (
Table 2).
In the cytotoxic activity, OEPT caused mortality of 1.75%, 87.12%, 98.19% and 100% of fibroblasts at concentrations of 125, 250, 500 and 1000 μg/mL. Concentration of 125 μg/mL showed a low toxicity when compared to other concentrations with a cytotoxic percentage of 1.75% (
Table 2).
In the literature, many
Piper species have been described with antiparasitic effect. This is the case of the essential oil of
Piper bredermayeri,
Piper cf. divaricatum, Piper. var brachypodom, which showed activity against epimastigote forms of
T. cruzi and promastigotes of
L. infantum (
30).
Piper auritum showed to be active against a variety of
L. braziliensis promastigote (
31), as well as the
Piper claussenianum was effective against variety of
L. amazonensis promastigote (
32) and
Piper malacophyllum was effective against
T. cruzi and
L. braziliensis (
33).
Some chemical compounds such as propanoic acid, esters, lignans, amides and terpenes, probably are responsible for the effect anti-leshmanicidal already identified in
Piper species (
32,
34,
35 and
36).
Such compounds may be associated with the effects observed in this study, since the main constituent of α-pinene of
P. bredermeyeri and
P. cf. divaricatum, same genus species of
P. tuberculatum Jacq, was considered responsible for the effect against epimastigotes and amastigotes of
T. Cruzi and promastigotes of
L. infantum. (
30). Other studies that have investigated this monoterpene alone showed significant results, justifying the effect obtained when using EOPT rich in α pinene. In the study of Sobral-Souza
et al., (
37) the α-pinene in the concentration of 100 µg/mL was effective against strains of the parasite
L. braziliensis, corroborating the results found in this article.
Other compounds in EOPT were also tested against
Leishmania spp. strains. Limonene also present in EOPT showed an EC
50 of 252.6 µM/mL against epimastigote and promastigote of
L. braziliensis variations (
38). In addition, Myrcene obtained from
Cymbopogon citratus showed an EC
50 of 164 µg/mL against cultures of promastigotes of
L. infantum (
39). Izumi (
40) noted that β-caryophyllene was effective against species of
Leishmania spp. showing a synergy when combined with copalic acid present in the essential oil of copaiba. This study helps to prove that the terpenes may have synergistic anti-parasitic activity, a finding that is quoted on some articles, though not proven.
Limonene in its isomeric forms was effective to reduce the number of strains of
T. cruzi epimastigote where the R-limonene showed a lower EC
50 than S-limonene, showing greater efficiency (
41). The caryophyllene obtained an EC
50 of 30 µg/mL and 100 µg/mL against epimastigote and promastigotes variations of
T. cruzi and
L. braziliensis respectively (
42).
Essential oils did not obtain their widely action mechanisms elucidated. Probably its lipid solubility and its secondary constituents influence in their antiparasitic activity, since it allows entry into cell membranes regulating structures of different layers of phospholipids, causing cellular damage (
25).
Some compounds derived from essential oils showed different mechanism of action. β-caryophyllene produced disorganization of kinetoplast, forming concentric membranous vacuoles, lipid peroxidation, and changes in cell membrane integrity (
40). This same compound is present in EOPT, suggesting that these EOPT may also have mechanisms of action. Other terpenes such as citral, presented antiparasitic activity against promastigotes of
L. amazonensis species by modifying the morphology and ultrastructure of the parasite, producing mitochondrial swelling, two flagella and exocytic projections of the flagellar bag (
43). The linalool also present in terpenes class produced significant changes of mitochondrial cristae parasites (
44).
For the treatment of some tropical diseases, medicinal plants have been shown to be a viable source in the search for new alternatives (
31). Thus, this study showed that the essential oil obtained from the fruits of
P. tuberculatum Jacq., had good antiparasitic potential, corroborating some data already described in the literature and that probably the major compounds are responsible for the observed effect. Nevertheless, it is necessary further testing in order to elucidate its mechanism of action.