Leishmaniasis, a neglected tropical disease, represents a major global public health challenge affecting nearly 100 countries worldwide, with an estimated annual incidence of 700,000 to 1 million new cases (
1,
2). This vector-borne disease exhibits disproportionate prevalence in resource-limited regions with inadequate healthcare infrastructure, particularly in parts of Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Eastern Mediterranean basin (
3,
4). Leishmaniasis is caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Leishmania, which are transmitted to humans via the bites of infected female phlebotomine sand flies (
5). The disease manifests in various clinical forms, including cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), visceral leishmaniasis, and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Cutaneous leishmaniasis represents the most prevalent clinical form of the disease, characterized by debilitating and disfiguring skin lesions (
6).
Conventional pharmacotherapeutic agents employed for leishmaniasis management, including antimonials, amphotericin B, miltefosine, and paromomycin, have exhibited diverse efficacy profiles (
7). Nevertheless, concerns surrounding drug resistance, extended treatment protocols, and adverse events have undermined the clinical viability of these conventional agents (
8,
9). Furthermore, the elevated costs and restricted accessibility of these drugs in endemic regions have amplified the healthcare disparities. Consequently, the suboptimal efficacy, high expenditure, and toxicity associated with current leishmaniasis pharmacotherapies have motivated the exploration of alternative treatment modalities (
10). In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in the utilization of natural products, particularly essential oils derived from medicinal plants, as potential sources of novel anti-leishmanial agents (
11).
Zataria multiflora and
Thymus vulgaris are two aromatic plant species that have been extensively recognized for their diverse medicinal attributes and have been traditionally employed in folk medicine for the treatment of various ailments (
12-
14).
Zataria multiflora and
T. vulgaris have been widely used not only in traditional medicine but also as culinary herbs, underscoring their safety profile and low toxicity in human consumption. This dietary use supports their potential as biocompatible alternatives to synthetic drugs, which often exhibit severe side effects (
15).
Preliminary studies have provided evidence for the anti-leishmanial potential of these plants. For instance, a hydroalcoholic extract of
T. vulgaris has been shown to be significantly more effective than systemic glucantime in reducing ulcer size in
Leishmania major-infected BALB/c mice (
16). Furthermore, thymol and carvacrol, the principal bioactive components of these plants, have demonstrated direct activity against Leishmania parasites, with synthesized derivatives showing high potency and promising Selectivity Indices (SIs) (
17). More recently, green-synthesized silver nanoparticles using
T. vulgaris extract exhibited significant anti-leishmanial activity against both promastigote and amastigote forms of
L. major (
18).
Zataria multiflora, commonly referred to as Avishan-e-Shirazi or Shirazi thyme, is indigenous to Iran and other regions of the Middle East. This plant is known to be rich in essential oils and has been extensively documented to exhibit antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties (
19,
20).
Thymus vulgaris, commonly referred to as common thyme, is widely distributed throughout Europe and the Mediterranean region, and has been utilized in traditional medicinal practices for centuries (
21).
The chemical composition of essential oils extracted from
Z. multiflora and
T. vulgaris has been extensively investigated, unveiling the presence of a diverse array of bioactive compounds, including monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and phenolic compounds (
22,
23). These compounds are renowned for their wide-ranging biological activities, encompassing antimicrobial and antiparasitic properties (
24). While previous studies have primarily focused on crude extracts of these plants or their use in synthesizing nanoparticles, our study targets their essential oils directly, which are more concentrated in bioactive compounds due to their hydrophobic nature and distillation-based extraction. Essential oils typically exhibit higher potency against pathogens compared to extracts, as they contain volatile terpenoids and phenolics that directly interfere with microbial membranes (
25,
26).