Chemicals
All carbamate standards were purchased from Dr. Ehrenstorfer Co. (Augsburg, Germany). All organic solvents, intended for extraction, were at least LC grade and purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Bulk quantities of anhydrous Na2SO4 and NaCl, were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Anhydrous MgSO4, was obtained from SIGMA-Aldich CO. (SIGMA-Aldich, Japan), The MgSO4 was baked for 5 h at 500ºC in a furnace to remove phthalates and residual water. Primary secondary amine (PSA) was purchased from Supelco (Supelco, USA).
GC–SQ/MS
An Agilent Technologies 6890N Network GC System chromatographs (Wilmington, USA) with a SQ detector and equipped with an Agilent 7683B autosampler (Agilent technologies, USA) was used. A HP-5 capillary column (film thickness: 30 m × 0.25 mm I.D., 0.1 μm) was used for separation.
Calibration standards
Individual stock standard solutions (1 mg/mL) were prepared in ethyl acetate and stored in the dark at -20°C. They were kept for 1 h at room temperature prior to their use. A mixed stock standard solution of pesticides was prepared in 15 μg/mL ethyl acetate. Spiked calibration standards at 6 levels of 25, 50, 100, 250, 500 and 1000 ng/mL were prepared by adding 25 μL, 50 μL, 100 μL, 250 μL, 500 μL and 1000 μL of mixed standard stock solution respectively to 15 g of cooked blank rice samples in each case.
A stock solution of triphenylmethane (TPM) in ethyl acetate at concentration of 1 mg/mL was used as internal standard. An aliquot of 10 μL of TPM solution in ethyl acetate (1000 mg/L) was added to the spiked rice sample as internal standard. The samples so obtained were treated as described in sample preparation.
Rice cooking
The iranian traditional method for rice cooking (Kateh) was used, in which a mixture of 15 g of white rice and 45 mL of distilled water was placed in a 100 mL Pyrex container. The mixture was heated for 20 min with hotplate and kept warm for another 45 min in order to complete the cooking process. The whole process was divided into three stages: 1) Five min from the start of heating to the start of boiling of the mixture; 2) Fifteen min from the start of boiling to the start of steam coming out of the rice cooker; 3) Forty five min from the start of steam coming out of the rice cooker to the end of cooking. A thermo-meter was applied for measuring the variation in temperature (100-105ºC) at the sampling locations during the rice cooking process.
Sample preparation
Two sets of samples were considered to evaluate the effect of cooking on pesticides residues. For the first set, both pesticides and internal standard were added to the rice after cooking. The second set was spiked with the pesticides prior to the cooking process and the internal standard was added after cooking. The first set was used to construct the calibration curve and validation of method. The second set was used to evaluate the effect of cooking process on pesticides residues.
In all cases, pesticides and/or internal standard solutions were added after cooling the cooked rice at room temperature (25°C) in order to avoid any possible decomposition of pesticides and internal standard. The spiked samples were left at ambient temperature in dark for 1.5 h. A volume of 120 mL acetonitrile was added to the mixture and then the mixture was blended. The mixture was blended at high speed for 1 min. Six grams of NaCl was added to the mixture, and blending was continued for another 60 sec. The supernatant was filtered through 25 g of Na2SO4 in a 250 mL container and the filtrate was evaporated by the rotary evaporator to 10 mL. The extract was transferred to a 50 mL falcon tube including 6 g MgSO4 and 300 mg PSA, and the residue in container was rinsed with 15 mL acetonitrile and added to the centrifuge tube. After shaking for 1 min and centrifugation for 7 min at 3000 rpm, the filtrate evaporated to 5 mL. The extract was transferred to a 15 mL falcon tube containing 2 g MgSO4 and 200 mg PSA (primary secondary amine (PSA) whichis one of the most powerful solid- phase extraction adsorbent for clean-up of food matrices and multi pesticide residue analysis. After shaking for 1 min and centrifugation for 7 min at 503 g, the filtrate was evaporated to 0.3 mL. The residue was reconstituted by toluene to obtain 1 mL solution and 2 μL of the solution was injected into gas chromatograph.
Recovery
For recovery determination, spiked cooked blank rice samples at concentration levels of 25, 50 and 500 ng/g were prepared in triplicates and then treated according to the procedure described in sample preparation. The recoveries were calculated using the spiked calibration curves.
Evaluation of pesticide’s reduction
The percentage of reduction after cooking was determined based on determination of recovery from triplicate spiked rice raw samples at levels 25, 100 and 500 ng/g of each pesticides before cooking and then after cooking according to rice cooking and treatment according to the procedure described in sample preparation.
GC-SQ–MS analysis
The GC-SQ-MS was employed with helium as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1 mL/min. The oven temperature started at 75°C and remained at this temperature for 3 min increasing to 120°C in a ramp rate of 25°C/min and then increased to 300°C at 5 °C/min ramp, holding at 300°C for 11 min. The injection port was adjusted at 250°C and the splitless mode was used.
After acquisition of the total ion chromatogram for the mixed stock standard solutions in scan mode, peaks were identified by their retention time and mass spectra. The identification was confirmed by comparing the relative abundances for three ions (one quantifier and two qualifiers) of the experimental standards to the known relative abundances of the Pest Library reference spectra. The most abundant ion that showed no evidence of chromatographic interference and had the highest signal-to-noise ratio was taken for quantification purposes.
Quantitation
The concentrations of pesticides were determined by interpolation of the relative peak areas for each pesticide to internal standard peak area in the sample on the spiked calibration curve. In order to compensate for losses during sample processing and instrumental analysis, internal standard (TPM) was used.