This cross-sectional study was conducted on the neuroimaging findings of children with AA, admitted to a large tertiary care center over 10 years. Children with at least one neuroimaging study were recruited in this study; consequently, our results only apply to patients with brain MRI or CT scan. Nearly 31% of the study population showed CUNP on neuroimaging. The most significant factors associated with the presence of CUNP included a longer duration of symptoms, ophthalmoplegia, focal neurologic deficit, and fever. On the other hand, a recent history of febrile illness and hyporeflexia were associated with the reduced presence and observation of CUNP on imaging.
In the present study most children with AA had no clinically urgent findings on neuroimaging. Evidence suggests that APCA, as the most common etiology of AA in children (
6,
8,
9), does not require further imaging workups. However, patients with the following risk factors can benefit from imaging studies: Age > 3 years, duration of symptoms > 3 days, meningeal irritation and focal neurologic signs, hyporeflexia, history of trauma, and ophthalmoplegia (
7,
8,
10).
The current findings are mainly consistent with previous studies. However, since our study population was heterogeneous, only patients with neuroimaging findings were included; therefore, some differences are expected. One of the most striking differences between the present study and previous research is that hyporeflexia was not associated with AA in the current study, whereas some studies found it to be a risk factor. This discrepancy may be attributed to the relatively large number of patients with GBS in our study, as they naturally do not have positive findings on the brain MRI or CT scan. Similarly, a recent history of febrile illness possibly suggests a viral infection and indicates APCA, which is not visible in neuroimaging.
Most previous studies support neuroimaging if a patient has a focal neurologic deficit, signs of increased intracranial pressure, marked asymmetry of ataxia, longer duration of symptoms (e.g., > 3 days), or older age (e.g., > 3 years) (
7,
8,
10,
11). The UpToDate currently suggests neuroimaging for patients with an altered state of consciousness, focal neurologic signs, cranial neuropathies, marked asymmetry of ataxia , suspicion of a mass lesion, or positive history of trauma (
12). However, none of the mentioned studies discuss when neuroimaging results should be suspected. Generally, some pathologies may not manifest in some imaging modalities. Considering the associations discovered in this study, a reevaluation of patients using another more sensitive imaging modality is necessary if the patient has no CUNP in the first imaging study, but has at least one of the following signs and symptoms: A longer duration of symptoms, ophthalmoplegia, focal neurologic deficit, or fever at presentation.
The present study had some limitations. First, it only included patients with neuroimaging studies; therefore, the results cannot be generalized to all children with AA. Second, the used imaging modalities were not consistent; therefore, comparison of these two modalities is flawed. Third, AA was defined as ataxia occurring within the last 30 days of presentation. Consequently, our population may have more life-threatening etiologies compared to other studies, thereby overstating the prevalence of CUNP. Fourth, since data collection was only performed by two people in this study, the population may be subject to selection bias. Fifth, this retrospective study had all the limitations attributed to this type of design, such as lack of follow-up. Finally, the study population was too small to reveal other significant associations; therefore, more extensive studies or meta-analyses are suggested in the future.
In conclusion, APCA was the most common cause of AA in children undergoing neuroimaging studies in our center. As some pathologies might not be detected using some imaging modalities, patients with risk factors, such as a longer duration of symptoms, ophthalmoplegia, focal neurologic deficit, and fever, who have no positive findings on initial imaging, should undergo further imaging with higher sensitivity. On the other hand, patients with hyporeflexia and a recent history of febrile illness might benefit more from other diagnostic modalities.