Numerous studies have supported the damaging effects of
Helicobacter pylori infection in human gastrointestinal system causing various disorders such as gastritis, gastric and duodenal ulcers (
1,
16). The bacterium was also shown to be involved in development of gastric cancer (
3). Various epidemiologic investigations have reported variable worldwide prevalence of this infection from 40% in developed countries to even 90% in some developing countries (
8). Having various universal reports and even the inter provincial differences, urged us to have a provincial look at
H. pylori infection in Qazvin, Iran. Polymerase chain reaction is a very useful advanced tool used to detection of microorganisms in various tissues. However, the results of studies that used PCR to detect oral
H. pylori were again highly variable, with detection rates ranging from 0 to 90%. Lu et al. (
17) evaluated five different primers in the PCR method for the detection of
H. pylori DNA which ureC gene PCR was the most sensitive and specific for detecting
H. pylori in gastric biopsy samples. Consistently, we used ureC gene in PCR methods and reported a high prevalence of the infection in this province using PCR and RUT tests as two specific methods detecting the presence of
H. pylori. In the present study, PCR gave the accuracy results highest and precision compared with the other method used. This explains that PCR is able to detect
H. pylori DNA even if the bacterium is present in very few numbers. According to our results and the results of others, we can conclude that the PCR technique is highly sensitive and specific, and is regarded the method of choice for detecting
H. pylori DNA in the oral cavity. Moreover, PCR technique requires minimal biopsy material as compared with fair-sized specimens that are needed for culture and histology to ensure successful detection. In the current study, a total of 100 individuals suffering from symptoms of upper gastrointestinal disorders were studied in regard to possible
H. pylori connection. Our results indicated 58% of the patients were positive for
H. pylori, which mostly agree with previous global results. The prevalence of
H. pylori infection was reported in Kargar et al. study to be 94.31% in Chaharmahal Bakhtiari province, Iran (
18). Rostami-Nejad et al. studied
H. pylori prevalence in Tehran, Iran in 2007 by analyzing biopsy specimens of 450 patients using serologic assays (
19). They showed 91% positive samples in the participants. Similar study conducted by Shokrzadeh et al. using histologic analysis revealed 86.8% out of 303 subjects to be positive for the infection in Tehran (
20). During the years of 2000 - 2002, Mitipat et al. studied biopsy specimens of 110 individuals with gastrointestinal symptoms using culture techniques and RUT experiment and showed 58% positive
H. pylori infections in Thailand (
21), which highly agrees with our findings in Qazvin. Furthermore, another study by Nwodo et al. in Kaduna, Kaduna State, Nigeria studying 225 sera samples of patients with gastritis and peptic ulcers using ELISA; showed 80.4% prevalence of
H. pylori (
22). Another survey analyzing the
H. pylori prevalence in Pakistan indicated 26.9% positive samples out of 4700 patients during 5 years of study (
23). In Australia also, Windsor et al. reported the overall prevalence of
H. pylori infections to be 76% using urease breath test (UBT) in 520 suspected individuals (
24).
Several interfering factors including socio-economic conditions such as low incomes, populated families, and low public health levels were reported to affect
H. pylori prevalence in developing countries (
10). The prevalence of infection has been also shown to vary within the different ethnical groups in a certain country (
9). Additionally, some studies have globally reported a tight association between
H. pylori infection and age. According to these researches, it was demonstrated that
H. pylori infections grow by age; which is mostly due to the unfavorable life style and a poor healthcare situation (
25). However, our study showed no significant correlation in this regard. Consistent with our study, many previous studies also ruled out the correlation between age and
H. pylori infection (
20,
21,
26-
28). It was speculated that family relationships may play roles in transmission of the infection from adults to children. It is also argued that the higher prevalence in adults may not be due to the direct effect of age but it can be due to the higher chance of exposure to the bacteria during a longer life span. It was also proposed by Jahan et al. that the dissimilar prevalence among different populations would be due to the cultural, genetic and life style differences (
25).
Despite a bit higher infections in women, our study indicated no statistically significant association between sex and the chance of developing the infection. However, as it was previously shown by Hestvik et al. (
29) and Shi et al. (
26) this relationship was significant. Some former studies such as those conducted by Shi et al. found a significant correlation between education and career, with
H. pylori infection (
26); while we have rejected any relationship between these factors in our study. In agreement with our data, this correlation was also denied by Shokrzadeh et al. (
20) and Mitipat et al (
21).