Given the potential risks and financial burden associated with CS, ongoing investigation into the underlying causes and epidemiologic drivers of its high utilization is essential. This study seeks to explore maternal and neonatal sociodemographic factors influencing delivery preferences by analyzing comprehensive data from Iran’s national birth registration system spanning April 2015 to April 2016. A systematic review previously conducted in Iran reported a CS prevalence of 48%, which is consistent with the 49.9% rate observed in our study (
10). Interestingly, the analysis revealed that older maternal age was linked to reduced odds of undergoing CS, which contrasts with findings from other studies that typically associate advanced maternal age with increased CS rates. This discrepancy may reflect unique aspects of clinical practice in Iran or suggest that older mothers, having had prior vaginal deliveries, are more likely to continue with non-surgical birth methods (
11). Our data were derived from a national registry, which included all deliveries rather than a hospital-based or selected sample. Therefore, the influence of clinical decision protocols and resource availability may differ from studies conducted in tertiary centers where CS is more frequently indicated. In many regions of Iran, women with pregnancy complications are closely monitored during pregnancy and often managed through timely medical interventions, possibly reducing emergency CS indications.
Our findings indicate that higher maternal education — especially among women holding a doctoral degree was strongly associated with an increased likelihood of choosing CS, aligning with trends reported in previous research. This may reflect the fact that more educated women often have greater access to health information and may seek greater autonomy and control over their childbirth experience (
12,
13). Our study indicates that highly educated mothers were 6.57 times more likely to undergo CS compared to illiterate mothers. Additionally, residing in rural areas — as opposed to cities — was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the likelihood of CS (OR = 0.528, P = 0.01).
The worldwide increase in CS rates has been extensively reported, yet the factors driving this trend are multifaceted and vary across different cultural and healthcare contexts. The findings from our study contribute to this ongoing discourse by highlighting how sociodemographic variables — such as maternal education, age, and place of residence — may influence delivery preferences and help explain the rising prevalence of CS. The strong association between higher maternal education and increased CS preference — particularly among mothers holding a doctoral degree — suggests that education may empower women to make more autonomous decisions regarding childbirth, often favoring CS for perceived safety, convenience, or control over timing. This pattern mirrors global observations where educated women in both high- and middle-income countries exhibit higher CS rates (
14,
15). Likewise, residing in urban areas was associated with a higher likelihood of CS. This trend may be attributed to greater availability of surgical infrastructure, institutional practices that favor medicalized childbirth, and distinct dynamics between patients and healthcare providers in urban settings (
16). Although our study found that older maternal age was associated with lower odds of CS — contrary to global trends — this discrepancy may be explained by Iran-specific factors such as multiparity and clinical practices that prioritize VD in older mothers with previous successful births (
17). Taken together, these findings suggest that shifts in maternal demographics, healthcare access, and cultural attitudes toward childbirth are key contributors to the worldwide escalation in CS rates.
Our analysis did not reveal a significant association between CS preference and a history of pregnancy or prior delivery. This finding contrasts with research from Pakistan, which indicated that women delivering their first child via CS were more likely to opt for the same method in subsequent pregnancies. Such differences may reflect variations in clinical guidelines, cultural attitudes, or healthcare provider practices across settings (
18).
Notably, our study found that pregnancy complications were associated with a significantly reduced likelihood of CS, a finding that diverges from much of the existing literature. Previous research has commonly linked CS preference to medical conditions such as chronic hypertension, cardiac disease, pulmonary disorders, and other high-risk factors. This unexpected result may reflect differences in clinical decision-making, patient preferences, or healthcare resource allocation within the Iranian context (
19).
Based on our results, CS appears to be a more suitable delivery method in cases of fetal distress and the need for resuscitation, which aligns with prior research showing an increased likelihood of CS under these conditions (
20,
21). Additionally, a cross-sectional study conducted in Iran identified prior CS and fetal distress as two of the most frequently cited obstetrical-medical reasons contributing to elevated CS rates. These findings underscore the role of clinical history and emergent fetal conditions in shaping delivery decisions (
11). Supporting Yeganegi et al.’s findings, which showed a higher risk of respiratory problems in neonates were born via CS (
22), our study also identified an increased risk of RDS and air leak syndrome in CS deliveries. Osman et al. found that CS — particularly elective procedures — are linked to higher rates of pneumothorax (
23). Furthermore, the increased incidence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid and meconium aspiration syndrome in CS deliveries (
24) supports the observed rise in air leak syndrome in these cases.
While our findings highlight descriptive associations between sociodemographic factors and CS preference, it is crucial to explore the underlying mechanisms driving these patterns. The strong correlation between higher maternal education and CS preference may reflect not only greater autonomy and access to health information, but also evolving perceptions of childbirth risk and expectations. Educated women may be more receptive to medical narratives that portray CS as a safer or more controlled option — particularly in contexts where VD is viewed as unpredictable or painful. This underscores the need for targeted antenatal counseling that promotes informed decision-making through balanced, evidence-based communication.
Conversely, the lower likelihood of CS among rural residents may be influenced by limited access to surgical services, prevailing cultural norms favoring natural birth, and systemic resource constraints that prioritize VD unless medically necessary. This disparity raises important equity concerns, as rural women may encounter obstacles in accessing CS when clinically indicated. Addressing these gaps requires strengthening referral pathways and expanding surgical capacity in underserved regions to ensure that all women receive appropriate, timely, and safe obstetric care.
The unexpected inverse relationship between older maternal age and CS observed in our cohort — contrary to global trends — may be attributed to multiparity and a history of vaginal deliveries, which often reduce the clinical need for surgical intervention. However, this finding also prompts critical reflection on local obstetric practices and whether age-related risks are being appropriately evaluated. It underscores the need for clearer clinical guidelines that integrate maternal age with parity and medical history to support more individualized and evidence-based decisions regarding delivery mode. Finally, the counterintuitive observation that pregnancy complications were linked to lower rates of CS challenges conventional assumptions about clinical decision-making. This finding may be indicative of underreporting of complications, delays in their recognition, or systemic barriers that hinder timely surgical intervention. Such issues underscore the urgent need for enhanced prenatal screening protocols, standardized documentation practices, and targeted clinical training to ensure that maternal complications are accurately identified and managed using the most appropriate and safest delivery method. Taken together, these findings underscore the multifaceted nature of CS trends, shaped by an intricate interplay of maternal education, healthcare access, clinical norms, and patient expectations. Effectively addressing these drivers’ calls for coordinated public health strategies that integrate provider training, culturally sensitive and patient-centered counseling, and systemic reforms. Such efforts are essential to promote the judicious and equitable use of CS — ensuring that surgical delivery is reserved for medically necessary cases while empowering women to make informed choices about their childbirth experience.
5.1. Conclusions
The study highlights the significant influence of academic achievement on childbirth choices in Iran. Women with higher educational levels — especially mothers holding a doctoral degree — were substantially more inclined to opt for cesarean delivery, suggesting that education impacts both health awareness and access to specialized medical options.
Cesarean births were associated with improved immediate neonatal outcomes, including higher Apgar scores, yet also carried increased risks for complications such as RDS and meconium aspiration. The likelihood of undergoing a CS was notably higher among urban women, who were often more educated, compared to their rural counterparts. These findings suggest that sociodemographic factors — particularly maternal education and urban residence — exert a stronger influence on CS preference than clinical indications alone. To address the prevalence of non-medically indicated CS, targeted educational initiatives and policy reforms are essential, especially within urban and highly educated populations. Such interventions should promote informed decision-making, balanced risk communication, and equitable access to appropriate delivery options.
5.2. Limitations
This study has several limitations that warrant consideration. Notably, the data analyzed reflect a specific period and may not fully capture shifts in maternal preferences or healthcare practices that have occurred since. Conducting a more recent study would allow for the evaluation of changes in delivery method preferences in relation to evolving sociodemographic, medical, and policy-related variables. Comparative analysis with updated data would enhance the generalizability of our findings and support more robust conclusions.